Cost-Effectiveness of Addressing Retinopathy of Prematurity in Rwanda.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Connor J Alder, Francis Mutangana, Victoria Phillips, Edmund R Becker, Neil S Fleming, Sherwin J Isenberg, Scott R Lambert, Tahvi D Frank
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Addressing Retinopathy of Prematurity in Rwanda.","authors":"Connor J Alder, Francis Mutangana, Victoria Phillips, Edmund R Becker, Neil S Fleming, Sherwin J Isenberg, Scott R Lambert, Tahvi D Frank","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2024.2372803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the expansion of neonatal care in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), an increasing number of premature babies are at risk to develop retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Previous studies have quantified the cost-effectiveness of addressing ROP in middle-income countries, but few have focused on SSA. This study estimates the cost of a national program for ROP screening and anti-VEGF injection treatment in Rwanda compared to the status quo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical cost data were collected from King Faisal Hospital in Rwanda (July 2022). Societal burden of vision loss included lost productivity and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Published data on epidemiology and natural history of ROP were used to estimate burden and sequelae of ROP in Rwanda. Cost of a national program for screening and treating a one-year birth cohort was compared to the status quo using a decision analysis model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cost of ROP screening and treatment was $738 per infant. The estimated equipment cost necessary for the startup of a national program was $58,667. We projected that a national program could avert 257 cases of blindness in the cohort and increase QALYs compared to the status quo. Screening and treatment for ROP would save an estimated $270,000 for the birth cohort from reductions in lost productivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cost of screening and anti-VEGF treatment for ROP is substantially less than the indirect cost of vision loss due to ROP. Allocating additional funding towards expansion of ROP screening and treatment is cost-saving from a societal perspective compared to current practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2372803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: With the expansion of neonatal care in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), an increasing number of premature babies are at risk to develop retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Previous studies have quantified the cost-effectiveness of addressing ROP in middle-income countries, but few have focused on SSA. This study estimates the cost of a national program for ROP screening and anti-VEGF injection treatment in Rwanda compared to the status quo.

Methods: Medical cost data were collected from King Faisal Hospital in Rwanda (July 2022). Societal burden of vision loss included lost productivity and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Published data on epidemiology and natural history of ROP were used to estimate burden and sequelae of ROP in Rwanda. Cost of a national program for screening and treating a one-year birth cohort was compared to the status quo using a decision analysis model.

Results: Cost of ROP screening and treatment was $738 per infant. The estimated equipment cost necessary for the startup of a national program was $58,667. We projected that a national program could avert 257 cases of blindness in the cohort and increase QALYs compared to the status quo. Screening and treatment for ROP would save an estimated $270,000 for the birth cohort from reductions in lost productivity.

Conclusion: The cost of screening and anti-VEGF treatment for ROP is substantially less than the indirect cost of vision loss due to ROP. Allocating additional funding towards expansion of ROP screening and treatment is cost-saving from a societal perspective compared to current practice.

卢旺达早产儿视网膜病变治疗的成本效益。
目的:随着撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA)新生儿护理范围的扩大,越来越多的早产儿面临罹患早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)的风险。以往的研究对中等收入国家应对早产儿视网膜病变的成本效益进行了量化,但很少有研究关注撒哈拉以南非洲地区。本研究估算了卢旺达全国性早产儿视网膜病变筛查和抗血管内皮生长因子注射治疗项目的成本与现状的比较:医疗成本数据来自卢旺达费萨尔国王医院(2022 年 7 月)。视力丧失造成的社会负担包括生产力损失和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。已发表的关于早产儿视网膜病变流行病学和自然病史的数据用于估算卢旺达早产儿视网膜病变的负担和后遗症。利用决策分析模型对筛查和治疗一岁出生队列的全国性计划的成本与现状进行了比较:结果:每个婴儿的视网膜病变筛查和治疗成本为 738 美元。启动一项全国性计划所需的设备成本估计为 58,667 美元。我们预测,与现状相比,全国性项目可避免 257 例失明,并增加 QALY。筛查和治疗早产儿视网膜病变可减少生产力损失,估计可为出生队列节省 27 万美元:结论:筛查和抗血管内皮生长因子治疗早产儿视网膜病变的成本大大低于早产儿视网膜病变导致视力丧失的间接成本。与目前的做法相比,从社会角度来看,为扩大早产儿视网膜病变筛查和治疗的范围而划拨额外资金可节约成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmic epidemiology
Ophthalmic epidemiology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信