Tina I Bui, Christopher W Farnsworth, Neil W Anderson
{"title":"Evaluation of a point-of-care rapid HIV antibody test with insights into acute HIV symptomatology in a population with low prevalence.","authors":"Tina I Bui, Christopher W Farnsworth, Neil W Anderson","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00620-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many emergency departments (ED) use rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody tests as screening tools, despite limited sensitivity for detecting acute HIV infections. In a 4-year retrospective analysis of 1,192 patients, we evaluated the performance of a third-generation rapid HIV antibody assay tested at point-of-care (POC, Chembio Sure Check HIV 1/2) against in-lab fourth-generation screening (Abbott Architect Ag/Ab Combo). Compared to complete algorithmic testing, the POC test demonstrated a 92.5% sensitivity (95% CI = 84.6-96.5), 98.1% specificity (95% CI = 97.1-98.8), 99.5% negative predictive value (NPV; 95% CI = 98.8-99.8), and a 77.9% positive predictive value (PPV; 95% CI = 68.6-85.1). Notably, the POC test failed to detect 100% (3/3) of acute HIV infections (defined as Fiebig stage 2) and 3.8% (2/52) established HIV infections, where viral loads were 5.9, 6.7, and >7 log<sub>10</sub> copies/mL. Symptoms such as fever, nausea/vomiting, malaise, headache, and photophobia were significantly associated with acute HIV infections diagnosed in the ED. The rapid HIV antibody test demonstrated high sensitivity, specificity, and NPV in our study population, reaffirming its effectiveness as a valuable screening tool. However, the low PPV and 100% failure to detect acute HIV infections underscore the importance of prioritizing in-lab fourth-generation HIV antigen/antibody combination immunoassays in cases of suspected acute HIV infection to ensure a timely and accurate diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0062024"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11389137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00620-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many emergency departments (ED) use rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody tests as screening tools, despite limited sensitivity for detecting acute HIV infections. In a 4-year retrospective analysis of 1,192 patients, we evaluated the performance of a third-generation rapid HIV antibody assay tested at point-of-care (POC, Chembio Sure Check HIV 1/2) against in-lab fourth-generation screening (Abbott Architect Ag/Ab Combo). Compared to complete algorithmic testing, the POC test demonstrated a 92.5% sensitivity (95% CI = 84.6-96.5), 98.1% specificity (95% CI = 97.1-98.8), 99.5% negative predictive value (NPV; 95% CI = 98.8-99.8), and a 77.9% positive predictive value (PPV; 95% CI = 68.6-85.1). Notably, the POC test failed to detect 100% (3/3) of acute HIV infections (defined as Fiebig stage 2) and 3.8% (2/52) established HIV infections, where viral loads were 5.9, 6.7, and >7 log10 copies/mL. Symptoms such as fever, nausea/vomiting, malaise, headache, and photophobia were significantly associated with acute HIV infections diagnosed in the ED. The rapid HIV antibody test demonstrated high sensitivity, specificity, and NPV in our study population, reaffirming its effectiveness as a valuable screening tool. However, the low PPV and 100% failure to detect acute HIV infections underscore the importance of prioritizing in-lab fourth-generation HIV antigen/antibody combination immunoassays in cases of suspected acute HIV infection to ensure a timely and accurate diagnosis.
尽管检测急性 HIV 感染的灵敏度有限,但许多急诊科(ED)仍使用快速人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)抗体检测作为筛查工具。在对 1,192 名患者进行的一项为期 4 年的回顾性分析中,我们评估了在医疗点(POC,Chembio Sure Check HIV 1/2)检测的第三代快速 HIV 抗体检测与实验室第四代筛查(雅培 Architect Ag/Ab Combo)的性能对比。与完整的算法测试相比,POC 测试的灵敏度为 92.5%(95% CI = 84.6-96.5),特异性为 98.1%(95% CI = 97.1-98.8),阴性预测值为 99.5%(NPV;95% CI = 98.8-99.8),阳性预测值为 77.9%(PPV;95% CI = 68.6-85.1)。值得注意的是,在病毒载量为 5.9、6.7 和 >7 log10 copies/mL 的情况下,POC 检测未能 100%(3/3)检测出急性 HIV 感染(定义为 Fiebig 2 期)和 3.8%(2/52)检测出确诊 HIV 感染。发热、恶心/呕吐、乏力、头痛和畏光等症状与急诊室确诊的急性艾滋病病毒感染密切相关。在我们的研究人群中,HIV 抗体快速检测具有较高的灵敏度、特异性和 NPV,再次证明了它作为一种有价值的筛查工具的有效性。然而,PPV 较低和 100% 检测不到急性 HIV 感染的结果突出表明,在怀疑急性 HIV 感染的病例中,优先使用实验室第四代 HIV 抗原/抗体组合免疫测定以确保及时准确诊断的重要性。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.