Antibiotic use and risk of Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Alexis Bejcek, Anupama Ancha, Megan Lewis, Ryan Beaver, Kristen Tecson, Jaccallene Bomar, Christopher Johnson
{"title":"Antibiotic use and risk of Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.","authors":"Alexis Bejcek, Anupama Ancha, Megan Lewis, Ryan Beaver, Kristen Tecson, Jaccallene Bomar, Christopher Johnson","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) compared with those without IBD, which is worsened with antibiotic usage. While prior studies have shown a correlation between CDI development and certain classes of antibiotics, the IBD population has not been well represented. This study evaluates the rates of CDI with outpatient antibiotic use in patients with IBD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study composed of patients with IBD and compared the incidence of CDI in patients who received an outpatient prescription for antibiotics (6694 patients) against those without prescriptions (6025 patients) from 2014 to 2020 at our institution. We compared CDI rates based on nine antibiotic classes: penicillins, cephalosporins, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, macrolides, quinolones, clindamycin, metronidazole, and nitrofurantoin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk of CDI was low (0.7%) but significantly higher for those with antibiotic exposure (0.9% vs 0.5%, P = 0.005) and had a positive correlation with a smoking history. The increased risk of CDI in the IBD population was attributable to the clindamycin and metronidazole classes (odds ratio = 4.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-11.9, P = 0.001; odds ratio = 3.6, 95% confidence interval: 2.1-6.2, P < 0.0001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of clindamycin or metronidazole prescribed in an outpatient setting was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of CDI in patients with IBD. Although the association between clindamycin and CDI is a well-established and common finding, the association between metronidazole and CDI is unique in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16720","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) compared with those without IBD, which is worsened with antibiotic usage. While prior studies have shown a correlation between CDI development and certain classes of antibiotics, the IBD population has not been well represented. This study evaluates the rates of CDI with outpatient antibiotic use in patients with IBD.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study composed of patients with IBD and compared the incidence of CDI in patients who received an outpatient prescription for antibiotics (6694 patients) against those without prescriptions (6025 patients) from 2014 to 2020 at our institution. We compared CDI rates based on nine antibiotic classes: penicillins, cephalosporins, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, macrolides, quinolones, clindamycin, metronidazole, and nitrofurantoin.

Results: The risk of CDI was low (0.7%) but significantly higher for those with antibiotic exposure (0.9% vs 0.5%, P = 0.005) and had a positive correlation with a smoking history. The increased risk of CDI in the IBD population was attributable to the clindamycin and metronidazole classes (odds ratio = 4.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-11.9, P = 0.001; odds ratio = 3.6, 95% confidence interval: 2.1-6.2, P < 0.0001, respectively).

Conclusions: The use of clindamycin or metronidazole prescribed in an outpatient setting was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of CDI in patients with IBD. Although the association between clindamycin and CDI is a well-established and common finding, the association between metronidazole and CDI is unique in this study.

抗生素的使用与炎症性肠病患者感染艰难梭菌的风险。
背景和目的:与非 IBD 患者相比,炎症性肠病 (IBD) 患者罹患艰难梭菌感染 (CDI) 的风险更高,而使用抗生素会使病情恶化。虽然之前的研究显示 CDI 的发生与某些类别的抗生素有关,但 IBD 患者的情况并不乐观。本研究评估了 IBD 患者在门诊使用抗生素时的 CDI 感染率:我们开展了一项由 IBD 患者组成的回顾性队列研究,并比较了本院 2014 年至 2020 年期间获得抗生素门诊处方的患者(6694 人)与未获处方的患者(6025 人)的 CDI 发生率。我们根据青霉素类、头孢菌素类、磺胺类、四环素类、大环内酯类、喹诺酮类、克林霉素类、甲硝唑类和硝基呋喃妥因类这九类抗生素的CDI发生率进行了比较:感染 CDI 的风险较低(0.7%),但接触过抗生素的患者感染 CDI 的风险明显较高(0.9% vs 0.5%,P = 0.005),且与吸烟史呈正相关。克林霉素和甲硝唑类药物增加了IBD人群的CDI风险(几率比=4.7,95%置信区间:1.9-11.9,P=0.001;几率比=3.6,95%置信区间:2.1-6.2,P 结论:克林霉素和甲硝唑类药物增加了IBD人群的CDI风险(几率比=4.7,95%置信区间:1.9-11.9,P=0.001):门诊处方中使用克林霉素或甲硝唑与 IBD 患者 CDI 风险的显著增加有统计学关联。虽然克林霉素与 CDI 之间的关联是一个公认的常见发现,但在本研究中,甲硝唑与 CDI 之间的关联却是独一无二的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信