Todd Brenner MD , Albert Kuo BS , Christina J. Sperna Weiland MD, PhD , Ayesha Kamal MD , B. Joseph Elmunzer MD, MPH , Hui Luo MD , James Buxbaum MD , Timothy B. Gardner MD, MS , Shaffer S. Mok MD , Evan S. Fogel MD , Veit Phillip MD , Jun-Ho Choi MD , Guan W. Lua MD , Ching-Chung Lin MD , D. Nageshwar Reddy MD , Sundeep Lakhtakia MD , Mahesh K. Goenka MD , Rakesh Kochhar MD , Mouen A. Khashab MD , Erwin J.M. van Geenen MD, PhD , Venkata S. Akshintala MD
{"title":"Development and validation of a machine learning–based, point-of-care risk calculator for post-ERCP pancreatitis and prophylaxis selection","authors":"Todd Brenner MD , Albert Kuo BS , Christina J. Sperna Weiland MD, PhD , Ayesha Kamal MD , B. Joseph Elmunzer MD, MPH , Hui Luo MD , James Buxbaum MD , Timothy B. Gardner MD, MS , Shaffer S. Mok MD , Evan S. Fogel MD , Veit Phillip MD , Jun-Ho Choi MD , Guan W. Lua MD , Ching-Chung Lin MD , D. Nageshwar Reddy MD , Sundeep Lakhtakia MD , Mahesh K. Goenka MD , Rakesh Kochhar MD , Mouen A. Khashab MD , Erwin J.M. van Geenen MD, PhD , Venkata S. Akshintala MD","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>A robust model of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) risk is not currently available. We aimed to develop a machine learning–based tool for PEP risk prediction to aid in clinical decision making related to periprocedural prophylaxis selection and postprocedural monitoring.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Feature selection, model training, and validation were performed using patient-level data from 12 randomized controlled trials. A gradient-boosted machine (GBM) model was trained to estimate PEP risk, and the performance of the resulting model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) with 5-fold cross-validation. A web-based clinical decision-making tool was created, and a prospective pilot study was performed using data from ERCPs performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital over a 1-month period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 7389 patients were included in the GBM with an 8.6% rate of PEP. The model was trained on 20 PEP risk factors and 5 prophylactic interventions (rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], aggressive hydration, combined rectal NSAIDs and aggressive hydration, pancreatic duct stenting, and combined rectal NSAIDs and pancreatic duct stenting). The resulting GBM model had an AUC of 0.70 (65% specificity, 65% sensitivity, 95% negative predictive value, and 15% positive predictive value). A total of 135 patients were included in the prospective pilot study, resulting in an AUC of 0.74.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of a novel machine learning–based PEP risk estimation tool with high negative predictive value to aid in prophylaxis selection and identify patients at low risk who may not require extended postprocedure monitoring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"101 1","pages":"Pages 129-138.e0"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510724034175","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Aims
A robust model of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) risk is not currently available. We aimed to develop a machine learning–based tool for PEP risk prediction to aid in clinical decision making related to periprocedural prophylaxis selection and postprocedural monitoring.
Methods
Feature selection, model training, and validation were performed using patient-level data from 12 randomized controlled trials. A gradient-boosted machine (GBM) model was trained to estimate PEP risk, and the performance of the resulting model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) with 5-fold cross-validation. A web-based clinical decision-making tool was created, and a prospective pilot study was performed using data from ERCPs performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital over a 1-month period.
Results
A total of 7389 patients were included in the GBM with an 8.6% rate of PEP. The model was trained on 20 PEP risk factors and 5 prophylactic interventions (rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], aggressive hydration, combined rectal NSAIDs and aggressive hydration, pancreatic duct stenting, and combined rectal NSAIDs and pancreatic duct stenting). The resulting GBM model had an AUC of 0.70 (65% specificity, 65% sensitivity, 95% negative predictive value, and 15% positive predictive value). A total of 135 patients were included in the prospective pilot study, resulting in an AUC of 0.74.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of a novel machine learning–based PEP risk estimation tool with high negative predictive value to aid in prophylaxis selection and identify patients at low risk who may not require extended postprocedure monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.