Patterns of Chemsex Substance Use and Its Association with HIV Transmission Risk Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Thailand: A Latent Class Analysis

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Doug H. Cheung, Nattharat Samoh, Kai J. Jonas, Sin How Lim, Yamol Kongjareon, Thomas E. Guadamuz
{"title":"Patterns of Chemsex Substance Use and Its Association with HIV Transmission Risk Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Thailand: A Latent Class Analysis","authors":"Doug H. Cheung,&nbsp;Nattharat Samoh,&nbsp;Kai J. Jonas,&nbsp;Sin How Lim,&nbsp;Yamol Kongjareon,&nbsp;Thomas E. Guadamuz","doi":"10.1007/s10508-024-02868-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sexualized substance use or “chemsex” may contribute to the HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Thailand. Specific patterns of chemsex use may be associated with different HIV/STI transmission risks. We examined typologies and correlates of sexualized substance use among a sample of high-risk MSM (<i>n</i> = 532) who had attended a private sex party or circuit party in the past three years using latent class analysis. Multinomial regression was used to adjust for variables associated with the 3-class latent class model. We identified a 3-class model as the best fitting model, which included: (1) “negligible sexualized substance users” (36.7%), who had never engaged in chemsex in the past six months; (2) “sexualized substance users” (13.9%), who had a high level of sexualized alcohol use and a wide range of other substances before or during sex in the past six months; and (3) “exclusive chemsex users” (49.4%), who predominantly used crystal methamphetamine, amyl nitrite, and erectile dysfunctional drugs before or during sex in the past six months. Compared to negligible sexualized substance users, exclusive chemsex users were more likely to be HIV-positive, more likely to have six or more sexual partners in the past six months, less likely to have condom use at last anal intercourse, and more likely to have provided sex work. Relative to negligible sexualized substance users, sexualized substance users reported more frequent online sex-seeking behaviors. These subgroups of Thai MSM have unique substance use patterns and HIV-related risk profiles, underscoring the importance of targeted HIV prevention strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8327,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","volume":"53 9","pages":"3527 - 3536"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-024-02868-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexualized substance use or “chemsex” may contribute to the HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Thailand. Specific patterns of chemsex use may be associated with different HIV/STI transmission risks. We examined typologies and correlates of sexualized substance use among a sample of high-risk MSM (n = 532) who had attended a private sex party or circuit party in the past three years using latent class analysis. Multinomial regression was used to adjust for variables associated with the 3-class latent class model. We identified a 3-class model as the best fitting model, which included: (1) “negligible sexualized substance users” (36.7%), who had never engaged in chemsex in the past six months; (2) “sexualized substance users” (13.9%), who had a high level of sexualized alcohol use and a wide range of other substances before or during sex in the past six months; and (3) “exclusive chemsex users” (49.4%), who predominantly used crystal methamphetamine, amyl nitrite, and erectile dysfunctional drugs before or during sex in the past six months. Compared to negligible sexualized substance users, exclusive chemsex users were more likely to be HIV-positive, more likely to have six or more sexual partners in the past six months, less likely to have condom use at last anal intercourse, and more likely to have provided sex work. Relative to negligible sexualized substance users, sexualized substance users reported more frequent online sex-seeking behaviors. These subgroups of Thai MSM have unique substance use patterns and HIV-related risk profiles, underscoring the importance of targeted HIV prevention strategies.

泰国男男性行为者使用化学性药物的模式及其与 HIV 传播风险的关系:潜类分析
在泰国,性化药物使用或 "化学性交 "可能会导致艾滋病在男男性行为者(MSM)中流行。使用化学性性行为的特定模式可能与不同的 HIV/STI 传播风险有关。我们使用潜类分析法研究了过去三年中参加过私人性派对或巡回派对的高风险 MSM(n = 532)样本中性物质使用的类型和相关性。多项式回归用于调整与三类潜类模型相关的变量。我们确定 3 类模型为最佳拟合模型,其中包括(1) "可忽略的性化物质使用者"(36.7%),他们在过去 6 个月中从未进行过化学性交;(2) "性化物质使用者"(13.9%),他们在过去 6 个月中在性爱前或性爱过程中大量使用性化酒精和多种其他物质;(3) "化学性交完全使用者"(49.4%),他们在过去 6 个月中在性爱前或性爱过程中主要使用冰毒、亚硝酸戊酯和勃起功能障碍药物。与可忽略不计的性药物使用者相比,专门的化学性使用者更有可能是艾滋病毒呈阳性者,更有可能在过去六个月中有六个或六个以上的性伴侣,在最后一次肛交时使用安全套的可能性较低,并且更有可能提供性工作。与可忽略不计的性药物使用者相比,性药物使用者报告了更频繁的在线寻求性行为。泰国男男性行为者中的这些亚群具有独特的药物使用模式和艾滋病相关风险特征,这凸显了有针对性的艾滋病预防策略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: The official publication of the International Academy of Sex Research, the journal is dedicated to the dissemination of information in the field of sexual science, broadly defined. Contributions consist of empirical research (both quantitative and qualitative), theoretical reviews and essays, clinical case reports, letters to the editor, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信