Darius Chapman, Campbell Strong, Prabhpreet Kaur, Anand N Ganesan
{"title":"Evaluation of a point-of-use kiosk for improving the fit of N95/P2 respirators in health care settings: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Darius Chapman, Campbell Strong, Prabhpreet Kaur, Anand N Ganesan","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fit of N95/P2 half-face respirators is critical. No objective ways exist to evaluate their implementation at use. Previously, we showed 26% of health care workers achieve appropriate fit at point of use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>657 quantitative fits were conducted on 166 subjects, using 4 different respirator styles. Randomization was performed; controls employing standard \"fit-check\" and intervention using a infrared video kiosk. Primary outcome was passing rates of quantitative fit, with secondary outcomes of respirator type, gender, race, and previous experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intervention demonstrated significantly higher pass rate (50.6%) compared with controls (30.8%). Odds of passing with kiosk was 2.3 (odds ratios [OR] 2.3, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.8-2.9, P < .001). Duckbill style improved the greatest (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.1-7.9, P < .001), and Tri-fold also showing substantial benefit (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.4-5.2, P < .001). Gender and race did not influence outcomes when using the kiosk, nor did previous experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A custom point-of-use kiosk improved odds of achieving a satisfactory fit of common respirator styles, independent of participant demographics. These findings open the door to addressing a gap in respiratory protection programs by providing individual assessment and interventions that improve worker safety at the time of highest risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.08.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Fit of N95/P2 half-face respirators is critical. No objective ways exist to evaluate their implementation at use. Previously, we showed 26% of health care workers achieve appropriate fit at point of use.
Methods: 657 quantitative fits were conducted on 166 subjects, using 4 different respirator styles. Randomization was performed; controls employing standard "fit-check" and intervention using a infrared video kiosk. Primary outcome was passing rates of quantitative fit, with secondary outcomes of respirator type, gender, race, and previous experience.
Results: Intervention demonstrated significantly higher pass rate (50.6%) compared with controls (30.8%). Odds of passing with kiosk was 2.3 (odds ratios [OR] 2.3, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.8-2.9, P < .001). Duckbill style improved the greatest (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.1-7.9, P < .001), and Tri-fold also showing substantial benefit (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.4-5.2, P < .001). Gender and race did not influence outcomes when using the kiosk, nor did previous experience.
Conclusions: A custom point-of-use kiosk improved odds of achieving a satisfactory fit of common respirator styles, independent of participant demographics. These findings open the door to addressing a gap in respiratory protection programs by providing individual assessment and interventions that improve worker safety at the time of highest risk.
期刊介绍:
AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)