Regions of Homozygocity size patterns among diverse ethnic groups in Israel: Toward tailored diagnostic reporting thresholds.

IF 1.7 4区 生物学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Idit Maya, Michal Levy, Reut Matar, Sarit Kahana, Ifaat Agmon-Fishman, Cochava Klein, Merav Gurevitch, Lina Basel-Salmon, Lena Sagi-Dain
{"title":"Regions of Homozygocity size patterns among diverse ethnic groups in Israel: Toward tailored diagnostic reporting thresholds.","authors":"Idit Maya, Michal Levy, Reut Matar, Sarit Kahana, Ifaat Agmon-Fishman, Cochava Klein, Merav Gurevitch, Lina Basel-Salmon, Lena Sagi-Dain","doi":"10.1002/ajmg.a.63839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long contiguous stretches of homozygosity or regions of homozygosity (ROH) are frequently detected via microarray and sequencing technologies. However, consensus on the establishment of specific size cutoffs for reporting ROH remains elusive. This study aims to assess the Total ROH Percentages (TRPS) and size of ROH segments across different ethnic origins, exploring potential disparities and proposing tailored diagnostic thresholds. This retrospective study included 13,035 microarray analyses conducted between 2017 to 2023. ROH segments on autosomal chromosomes were retrieved, and samples lacking ROH segments were excluded. The cohort was categorized based on reported ethnic origins, and TRPS and ROH segment size were analyzed for each origin. Distinct TRPS values were noted among different ethnic groups, ranging from median 0.36% in Ethiopian Jewish cohort and up to 6.42% in the Bedouin population. Wide range of 99th percentiles of ROH segment size for various origins was noted, ranging from 10.6 to 51.5 Mb. A significant correlation between ROH segment sizes and TRPS was noted in each origin. Statistically significant differences in ROH segment sizes were noted between the Jewish and the Israeli Arab/Druze origins in TRPS from 1% to 9.99%, whereas extremities of low (0.11%-0.99%) and high (over 10%) TRPS yielded no significant differences. In conclusion, as fixed absolute size thresholds may overlook pathogenic segments in certain populations while generating excessive reports in others, tailored approaches to define ROH reporting thresholds can be considered to facilitate the accuracy and clinical relevance of genomic analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":7507,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.63839","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long contiguous stretches of homozygosity or regions of homozygosity (ROH) are frequently detected via microarray and sequencing technologies. However, consensus on the establishment of specific size cutoffs for reporting ROH remains elusive. This study aims to assess the Total ROH Percentages (TRPS) and size of ROH segments across different ethnic origins, exploring potential disparities and proposing tailored diagnostic thresholds. This retrospective study included 13,035 microarray analyses conducted between 2017 to 2023. ROH segments on autosomal chromosomes were retrieved, and samples lacking ROH segments were excluded. The cohort was categorized based on reported ethnic origins, and TRPS and ROH segment size were analyzed for each origin. Distinct TRPS values were noted among different ethnic groups, ranging from median 0.36% in Ethiopian Jewish cohort and up to 6.42% in the Bedouin population. Wide range of 99th percentiles of ROH segment size for various origins was noted, ranging from 10.6 to 51.5 Mb. A significant correlation between ROH segment sizes and TRPS was noted in each origin. Statistically significant differences in ROH segment sizes were noted between the Jewish and the Israeli Arab/Druze origins in TRPS from 1% to 9.99%, whereas extremities of low (0.11%-0.99%) and high (over 10%) TRPS yielded no significant differences. In conclusion, as fixed absolute size thresholds may overlook pathogenic segments in certain populations while generating excessive reports in others, tailored approaches to define ROH reporting thresholds can be considered to facilitate the accuracy and clinical relevance of genomic analyses.

以色列不同种族群体中的同基因大小模式:实现量身定制的诊断报告阈值。
通过微阵列和测序技术,经常可以检测到长的连续的同源性片段或同源性区域(ROH)。然而,在确定报告 ROH 的特定大小临界值方面仍未达成共识。本研究旨在评估不同种族的总ROH百分比(TRPS)和ROH片段的大小,探索潜在的差异,并提出有针对性的诊断阈值。这项回顾性研究纳入了2017年至2023年间进行的13035项微阵列分析。研究人员检索了常染色体上的ROH片段,并排除了缺乏ROH片段的样本。根据报告的种族来源对队列进行分类,并分析每个来源的TRPS和ROH片段大小。不同种族群体的 TRPS 值各不相同,埃塞俄比亚犹太人群的中位数为 0.36%,贝都因人群则高达 6.42%。不同种族的 ROH 区段大小的第 99 百分位数范围很广,从 10.6 到 51.5 Mb 不等。在每个血统中,ROH区段大小与TRPS之间都存在明显的相关性。犹太血统和以色列阿拉伯/德鲁兹血统的 ROH 区段大小在 TRPS 方面存在明显的统计学差异,从 1%到 9.99%不等,而低 TRPS(0.11%-0.99%)和高 TRPS(超过 10%)的两端则没有明显差异。总之,由于固定的绝对大小阈值可能会忽略某些人群中的致病片段,而在其他人群中产生过多的报告,因此可以考虑采用定制方法来定义 ROH 报告阈值,以提高基因组分析的准确性和临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
432
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medical Genetics - Part A (AJMG) gives you continuous coverage of all biological and medical aspects of genetic disorders and birth defects, as well as in-depth documentation of phenotype analysis within the current context of genotype/phenotype correlations. In addition to Part A , AJMG also publishes two other parts: Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics , covering experimental and clinical investigations of the genetic mechanisms underlying neurologic and psychiatric disorders. Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics , guest-edited collections of thematic reviews of topical interest to the readership of AJMG .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信