Belief Updating in Subclinical and Clinical Delusions.

Schizophrenia bulletin open Pub Date : 2022-12-14 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac074
Sophie Fromm, Teresa Katthagen, Lorenz Deserno, Andreas Heinz, Jakob Kaminski, Florian Schlagenhauf
{"title":"Belief Updating in Subclinical and Clinical Delusions.","authors":"Sophie Fromm, Teresa Katthagen, Lorenz Deserno, Andreas Heinz, Jakob Kaminski, Florian Schlagenhauf","doi":"10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Current frameworks propose that delusions result from aberrant belief updating due to altered prediction error (PE) signaling and misestimation of environmental volatility. We aimed to investigate whether behavioral and neural signatures of belief updating are specifically related to the presence of delusions or generally associated with manifest schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our cross-sectional design includes human participants (<i>n</i>[female/male] = 66[25/41]), stratified into four groups: healthy participants with minimal (<i>n</i> = 22) or strong delusional-like ideation (<i>n</i> = 18), and participants with diagnosed schizophrenia with minimal (<i>n</i> = 13) or strong delusions (<i>n</i> = 13), resulting in a 2 × 2 design, which allows to test for the effects of delusion and diagnosis. Participants performed a reversal learning task with stable and volatile task contingencies during fMRI scanning. We formalized learning with a hierarchical Gaussian filter model and conducted model-based fMRI analysis regarding beliefs of outcome uncertainty and volatility, precision-weighted PEs of the outcome- and the volatility-belief.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with schizophrenia as compared to healthy controls showed lower accuracy and heightened choice switching, while delusional ideation did not affect these measures. Participants with delusions showed increased precision-weighted PE-related neural activation in fronto-striatal regions. People with diagnosed schizophrenia overestimated environmental volatility and showed an attenuated neural representation of volatility in the anterior insula, medial frontal and angular gyrus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Delusional beliefs are associated with altered striatal PE-signals. Juxtaposing, the potentially unsettling belief that the environment is constantly changing and weaker neural encoding of this subjective volatility seems to be associated with manifest schizophrenia, but not with the presence of delusional ideation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94380,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia bulletin open","volume":"4 1","pages":"sgac074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11207849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia bulletin open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and hypothesis: Current frameworks propose that delusions result from aberrant belief updating due to altered prediction error (PE) signaling and misestimation of environmental volatility. We aimed to investigate whether behavioral and neural signatures of belief updating are specifically related to the presence of delusions or generally associated with manifest schizophrenia.

Methods: Our cross-sectional design includes human participants (n[female/male] = 66[25/41]), stratified into four groups: healthy participants with minimal (n = 22) or strong delusional-like ideation (n = 18), and participants with diagnosed schizophrenia with minimal (n = 13) or strong delusions (n = 13), resulting in a 2 × 2 design, which allows to test for the effects of delusion and diagnosis. Participants performed a reversal learning task with stable and volatile task contingencies during fMRI scanning. We formalized learning with a hierarchical Gaussian filter model and conducted model-based fMRI analysis regarding beliefs of outcome uncertainty and volatility, precision-weighted PEs of the outcome- and the volatility-belief.

Results: Patients with schizophrenia as compared to healthy controls showed lower accuracy and heightened choice switching, while delusional ideation did not affect these measures. Participants with delusions showed increased precision-weighted PE-related neural activation in fronto-striatal regions. People with diagnosed schizophrenia overestimated environmental volatility and showed an attenuated neural representation of volatility in the anterior insula, medial frontal and angular gyrus.

Conclusions: Delusional beliefs are associated with altered striatal PE-signals. Juxtaposing, the potentially unsettling belief that the environment is constantly changing and weaker neural encoding of this subjective volatility seems to be associated with manifest schizophrenia, but not with the presence of delusional ideation.

亚临床和临床妄想中的信念更新
背景与假设:目前的研究框架认为,妄想是由于预测错误(PE)信号的改变和对环境波动性的错误估计而导致的信念更新异常。我们的目的是研究信念更新的行为和神经特征是否与妄想的出现特别相关,或者是否一般与明显的精神分裂症相关:我们的横断面设计包括人类参与者(n[女/男] = 66[25/41]),分为四组:健康参与者(n = 22)或强烈的妄想样意念(n = 18),以及确诊为精神分裂症的参与者(n = 13)或强烈的妄想(n = 13),从而形成一个 2 × 2 设计,以检验妄想和诊断的影响。在进行fMRI扫描时,受试者执行了一项具有稳定和不稳定任务或然条件的反向学习任务。我们用分层高斯滤波模型对学习进行了形式化,并对结果不确定性和波动性信念、结果信念和波动性信念的精确加权PE进行了基于模型的fMRI分析:结果发现:与健康对照组相比,精神分裂症患者的选择准确性更低,选择转换更频繁,而妄想症并不影响这些指标。妄想症患者在前额纹状体区域表现出更高的精确加权PE相关神经激活。已确诊的精神分裂症患者高估了环境的波动性,并在前脑岛、额叶内侧和角回显示出波动性神经表征的减弱:妄想与纹状体 PE 信号的改变有关。结论:妄想信念与纹状体PE信号的改变有关。同时,环境不断变化这一潜在的令人不安的信念以及这种主观波动性较弱的神经编码似乎与明显的精神分裂症有关,但与妄想意识的存在无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信