Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Fibrotic Lung Disease: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial.

Steven D Nathan, Natasa Rajicic, Rosemarie Dudenhofer, Rahat Hussain, Rahul Argula, Debabrata Bandyopadhyay, Tracy Luckhardt, Natalia Muehlemann, Kevin R Flaherty, Marilyn K Glassberg, Lisa Lancaster, Ganesh Raghu, Peter Fernandes
{"title":"Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Fibrotic Lung Disease: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial.","authors":"Steven D Nathan, Natasa Rajicic, Rosemarie Dudenhofer, Rahat Hussain, Rahul Argula, Debabrata Bandyopadhyay, Tracy Luckhardt, Natalia Muehlemann, Kevin R Flaherty, Marilyn K Glassberg, Lisa Lancaster, Ganesh Raghu, Peter Fernandes","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202406-662OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been shown to result in benefits in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (f-ILD) receiving supplemental oxygen in two independent trials. <b>Objective:</b> This phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study sought to validate the benefit of ambulatory iNO in patients with f-ILD requiring supplemental oxygen. <b>Methods:</b> Patients with f-ILD receiving supplemental long-term oxygen were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to iNO at 45 μg/kg ideal body weight per hour or placebo for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to Week 16 in MVPA assessed by accelerometry. Secondary outcomes included overall activity, 6-minute-walk distance and patient-reported outcomes. <b>Results:</b> 145 patients were enrolled; 75 were assigned to receive iNO and 70 placebo. The changes from baseline in MVPA at 16 weeks were -9.2 min/d (standard error, 3.51) in the iNO45 group and -3.7 min/d (3.76) in the placebo group (difference, 5.5; <i>P</i> = 0.265). No statistically significant differences between the two treatment arms were found for any of the secondary outcomes. A subgroup analysis of patients with an intermediate or high probability of pulmonary hypertension on echocardiography did not demonstrate any benefit. The most common adverse events reported were respiratory tract infections, but the therapy was generally very well tolerated. <b>Conclusions:</b> There was no demonstrable benefit to iNO in patients with f-ILD receiving supplemental oxygen in daily physical activity assessed by actigraphy, a potential novel clinical trial endpoint. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03267108).</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1661-1669"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202406-662OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been shown to result in benefits in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (f-ILD) receiving supplemental oxygen in two independent trials. Objective: This phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study sought to validate the benefit of ambulatory iNO in patients with f-ILD requiring supplemental oxygen. Methods: Patients with f-ILD receiving supplemental long-term oxygen were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to iNO at 45 μg/kg ideal body weight per hour or placebo for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to Week 16 in MVPA assessed by accelerometry. Secondary outcomes included overall activity, 6-minute-walk distance and patient-reported outcomes. Results: 145 patients were enrolled; 75 were assigned to receive iNO and 70 placebo. The changes from baseline in MVPA at 16 weeks were -9.2 min/d (standard error, 3.51) in the iNO45 group and -3.7 min/d (3.76) in the placebo group (difference, 5.5; P = 0.265). No statistically significant differences between the two treatment arms were found for any of the secondary outcomes. A subgroup analysis of patients with an intermediate or high probability of pulmonary hypertension on echocardiography did not demonstrate any benefit. The most common adverse events reported were respiratory tract infections, but the therapy was generally very well tolerated. Conclusions: There was no demonstrable benefit to iNO in patients with f-ILD receiving supplemental oxygen in daily physical activity assessed by actigraphy, a potential novel clinical trial endpoint. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03267108).

吸入一氧化氮治疗纤维化肺病:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
理由:在两项独立试验中,吸入一氧化氮(iNO)对需要补充氧气的纤维化间质性肺病(if-ILD)患者进行中度到剧烈运动(MVPA)有益处:这项三期随机双盲安慰剂对照研究旨在验证非卧床 iNO 对需要补充氧气的 f-ILD 患者的益处:需要长期补充氧气的 f-ILD 患者按 1:1 的比例随机接受每小时 45 µg/kg 理想体重的吸入一氧化氮或安慰剂治疗,为期 16 周。主要结果是通过加速度计评估从基线到第16周的MVPA变化。次要结果包括总体活动量、六分钟步行距离和患者报告结果:共招募了 145 名患者,其中 75 人被分配接受 iNO 治疗,70 人被分配接受安慰剂治疗。16周时,iNO45组的MVPA与基线相比变化为-9.2分钟/天(SE 3.51),而安慰剂组为-3.7 (3.76)分钟/天(差异为5.5;P=0.265)。在任何次要结果中,两个治疗组之间均未发现有统计学意义的差异。对超声心动图显示有中度或高度肺动脉高压可能性的患者进行的亚组分析未显示出任何益处。最常见的不良反应是呼吸道感染,但治疗的耐受性普遍很好:结论:在使用补氧的 f-ILD 患者中,iNO 对其日常体力活动无明显益处,而体力活动是一项潜在的新型临床试验终点。临床试验注册请访问 www.Clinicaltrials: gov,ID:NCT03267108。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信