Eye Movement Differences in Contact Versus Non-Contact Olympic Athletes.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Motor Behavior Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1080/00222895.2024.2388769
Nicholas P Murray, Melissa Hunfalvay, Christopher Mesagno, Brittany Trotter, Eva V Monsma, Ethan Greenstein, Frederick Robert Carrick
{"title":"Eye Movement Differences in Contact Versus Non-Contact Olympic Athletes.","authors":"Nicholas P Murray, Melissa Hunfalvay, Christopher Mesagno, Brittany Trotter, Eva V Monsma, Ethan Greenstein, Frederick Robert Carrick","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2024.2388769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in oculomotor functioning between Olympic-level contact and non-contact sports participants. In total, 67 male and female Olympic-level contact (<i>n</i> = 27) and non-contact (<i>n</i> = 40) athletes completed oculomotor tasks, including Horizontal Saccade (HS), Circular Smooth Pursuit (CSP), Horizontal Smooth Pursuit (HSP), and Vertical Smooth Pursuit (VSP) using a remote eye tracker. No significant differences for sex or age occurred. Each variable indicated higher scores for contact compared to non-contact athletes (<i>p</i> < .05) except for VSP Pathway differences and CSP Synchronization. A logistic regression was performed to determine the degree that HS measures, CSP synchronization, and VSP pathway predicted sport type. The model was significant, <i>χ<sup>2</sup></i>(6) = 37.08, <i>p</i> < .001, explaining 57.4% of the variance and correctly classified 88.1% of cases. The sensitivity was 87.5% and specificity was 88.9%. CSP synchronization did not increase the likelihood of participating in a contact sport. This was the first study to identify oculomotor differences between Olympic athletes of contact and non-contact sports, which adds to the growing evidence that oculomotor functioning may be a reliable, quick, real-time tool to help detect mTBI in sport.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2024.2388769","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in oculomotor functioning between Olympic-level contact and non-contact sports participants. In total, 67 male and female Olympic-level contact (n = 27) and non-contact (n = 40) athletes completed oculomotor tasks, including Horizontal Saccade (HS), Circular Smooth Pursuit (CSP), Horizontal Smooth Pursuit (HSP), and Vertical Smooth Pursuit (VSP) using a remote eye tracker. No significant differences for sex or age occurred. Each variable indicated higher scores for contact compared to non-contact athletes (p < .05) except for VSP Pathway differences and CSP Synchronization. A logistic regression was performed to determine the degree that HS measures, CSP synchronization, and VSP pathway predicted sport type. The model was significant, χ2(6) = 37.08, p < .001, explaining 57.4% of the variance and correctly classified 88.1% of cases. The sensitivity was 87.5% and specificity was 88.9%. CSP synchronization did not increase the likelihood of participating in a contact sport. This was the first study to identify oculomotor differences between Olympic athletes of contact and non-contact sports, which adds to the growing evidence that oculomotor functioning may be a reliable, quick, real-time tool to help detect mTBI in sport.

接触式与非接触式奥林匹克运动员的眼球运动差异。
本研究旨在调查奥林匹克接触式和非接触式运动参与者在眼球运动功能方面的差异。共有 67 名男女奥林匹克接触级(27 人)和非接触级(40 人)运动员使用远程眼动仪完成了眼球运动任务,包括水平回旋(HS)、环形平滑追逐(CSP)、水平平滑追逐(HSP)和垂直平滑追逐(VSP)。性别和年龄无明显差异。与非接触式运动员相比,接触式运动员的每个变量得分都更高(P < .05),但 VSP 路径差异和 CSP 同步性除外。为确定HS测量、CSP同步和VSP路径对运动类型的预测程度,进行了逻辑回归。该模型具有显著性(χ2(6) = 37.08, p < .001),解释了 57.4% 的方差,正确分类了 88.1% 的病例。灵敏度为 87.5%,特异性为 88.9%。CSP同步并不会增加参加接触性运动的可能性。这是第一项发现接触性运动和非接触性运动的奥林匹克运动员之间的眼球运动差异的研究,这为越来越多的证据表明眼球运动功能可能是帮助检测运动中的 mTBI 的可靠、快速、实时工具提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信