Management and patient outcomes following admission with acute cholecystitis in Ireland: A national registry-based study

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
R.M. O'Connell , N. Hardy , L. Ward , F. Hand , D. Maguire , A. Stafford , T.K. Gallagher , E. Hoti , A.W. O'Sullivan , C.B. Ó Súilleabháin , T. Gall , G. McEntee , J. Conneely
{"title":"Management and patient outcomes following admission with acute cholecystitis in Ireland: A national registry-based study","authors":"R.M. O'Connell ,&nbsp;N. Hardy ,&nbsp;L. Ward ,&nbsp;F. Hand ,&nbsp;D. Maguire ,&nbsp;A. Stafford ,&nbsp;T.K. Gallagher ,&nbsp;E. Hoti ,&nbsp;A.W. O'Sullivan ,&nbsp;C.B. Ó Súilleabháin ,&nbsp;T. Gall ,&nbsp;G. McEntee ,&nbsp;J. Conneely","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Acute cholecystitis is a common general surgical emergency, accounting for 3–10 % of all patients attending with acute abdominal pain. International guidelines suggest that emergency cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for uncomplicated acute cholecystitis where feasible. There is a paucity of published data on the uptake of emergency cholecystectomy in Ireland.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The aim of this study was to evaluate the management of acute cholecystitis in Ireland and to establish the rate of emergency cholecystectomy performed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients with acute cholecystitis presenting to public hospitals in Ireland between January 2017 and July 2023 were identified using the National Quality Assurance and Improvement System (NQAIS). Data were collected on patient demographics, co-morbidities, length of stay, operative intervention, endoscopic intervention, critical care admissions, in-patient mortality, and readmissions. Propensity score matched analysis and logistic regression were performed to account for selection bias in comparing patients managed with cholecystectomy and those managed conservatively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>20,886 admission episodes were identified involving 17,958 patients. 3585 (20 %) patients underwent emergency cholecystectomy in total. 3436 (96 %) of these were performed laparoscopically, with 140 (4 %) requiring conversion to an open procedure, and common bile duct injuries occurring in 4 (0.1 %) of patients. In comparison to patients treated conservatively, patients who underwent cholecystectomy were younger (median 50 v 60 years, p &lt; 0.001) and more likely to be female (64 % v 55 % p &lt; 0.001). Following propensity score matched analysis, those who had an emergency cholecystectomy had reduced length of stay (LOS) (median 5 days (IQR 3–8) v 6 days (interquartile range (IQR) 3–10), p &lt; 0.001) and fewer readmissions to hospital (282 (8 %) v 492 (14 %), p &lt; 0.001). On logistic regression, age &gt;65 (OR 1.526), CCI &gt;3 (OR 2.281) and non-operative management (OR 1.136) were significant risk factors for adverse outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Uptake of emergency cholecystectomy in Ireland remains low, and is carried out on a younger, fitter cohort of patients. In those patients, however, it is associated with improved outcomes for cholecystitis compared to conservative management, including shorter LOS and reduced readmission rates for matched cohorts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":"22 6","pages":"Pages 364-368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Acute cholecystitis is a common general surgical emergency, accounting for 3–10 % of all patients attending with acute abdominal pain. International guidelines suggest that emergency cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for uncomplicated acute cholecystitis where feasible. There is a paucity of published data on the uptake of emergency cholecystectomy in Ireland.

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the management of acute cholecystitis in Ireland and to establish the rate of emergency cholecystectomy performed.

Methods

All patients with acute cholecystitis presenting to public hospitals in Ireland between January 2017 and July 2023 were identified using the National Quality Assurance and Improvement System (NQAIS). Data were collected on patient demographics, co-morbidities, length of stay, operative intervention, endoscopic intervention, critical care admissions, in-patient mortality, and readmissions. Propensity score matched analysis and logistic regression were performed to account for selection bias in comparing patients managed with cholecystectomy and those managed conservatively.

Results

20,886 admission episodes were identified involving 17,958 patients. 3585 (20 %) patients underwent emergency cholecystectomy in total. 3436 (96 %) of these were performed laparoscopically, with 140 (4 %) requiring conversion to an open procedure, and common bile duct injuries occurring in 4 (0.1 %) of patients. In comparison to patients treated conservatively, patients who underwent cholecystectomy were younger (median 50 v 60 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be female (64 % v 55 % p < 0.001). Following propensity score matched analysis, those who had an emergency cholecystectomy had reduced length of stay (LOS) (median 5 days (IQR 3–8) v 6 days (interquartile range (IQR) 3–10), p < 0.001) and fewer readmissions to hospital (282 (8 %) v 492 (14 %), p < 0.001). On logistic regression, age >65 (OR 1.526), CCI >3 (OR 2.281) and non-operative management (OR 1.136) were significant risk factors for adverse outcome.

Conclusion

Uptake of emergency cholecystectomy in Ireland remains low, and is carried out on a younger, fitter cohort of patients. In those patients, however, it is associated with improved outcomes for cholecystitis compared to conservative management, including shorter LOS and reduced readmission rates for matched cohorts.
爱尔兰急性胆囊炎患者入院后的管理和疗效:一项基于全国登记册的研究。
导言:急性胆囊炎是一种常见的普通外科急症,在所有因急性腹痛就诊的患者中占 3-10%。国际指南建议,在可行的情况下,急诊胆囊切除术是治疗无并发症急性胆囊炎的首选方法。本研究旨在评估爱尔兰急性胆囊炎的治疗情况,并确定急诊胆囊切除术的比例:通过国家质量保证和改进系统(NQAIS)确定了2017年1月至2023年7月期间在爱尔兰公立医院就诊的所有急性胆囊炎患者。收集的数据包括患者人口统计学、并发症、住院时间、手术干预、内镜干预、重症监护入院、住院死亡率和再入院率。在比较采用胆囊切除术和保守治疗的患者时,进行了倾向得分匹配分析和逻辑回归,以考虑选择偏差。共有 3585 名(20%)患者接受了急诊胆囊切除术。其中 3436 例(96%)是腹腔镜手术,140 例(4%)需要转为开腹手术,4 例(0.1%)患者的胆总管受伤。与保守治疗的患者相比,接受胆囊切除术的患者更年轻(中位数50岁对60岁,P65(OR 1.526)),CCI>3(OR 2.281)和非手术治疗(OR 1.136)是导致不良后果的重要风险因素:结论:在爱尔兰,急诊胆囊切除术的采用率仍然很低,而且是在较年轻、体格较好的患者群体中实施。然而,与保守治疗相比,对这些患者实施胆囊切除术可改善胆囊炎的治疗效果,包括缩短住院时间和降低匹配队列的再入院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信