Experiences of intensive treatment for people with eating disorders: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Hannah Webb, Maria Griffiths, Ulrike Schmidt
{"title":"Experiences of intensive treatment for people with eating disorders: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.","authors":"Hannah Webb, Maria Griffiths, Ulrike Schmidt","doi":"10.1186/s40337-024-01061-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eating disorders are complex difficulties that impact the individual, their supporters and society. Increasing numbers are being admitted to intensive treatment settings (e.g., for inpatient treatment, day-patient treatment or acute medical treatment). The lived experience perspectives of what helps and hinders eating disorder recovery during intensive treatment is an emerging area of interest. This review aims to explore patients' perspectives of what helps and hinders recovery in these contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted to identify studies using qualitative methods to explore patients' experiences of intensive treatment for an eating disorder. Article quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP) checklist and thematic synthesis was used to analyse the primary research and develop overarching analytical themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty articles met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The methodological quality was mostly good. Thematic synthesis generated six main themes; collaborative care supports recovery; a safe and terrifying environment; negotiating identity; supporting mind and body; the need for specialist support; and the value of close others. The included articles focused predominantly on specialist inpatient care and were from eight different countries. One clear limitation was that ethnicity data were not reported in 22 out of the 30 studies. When ethnicity data were reported, participants predominantly identified as white.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identifies that a person-centred, biopsychosocial approach is necessary throughout all stages of eating disorder treatment, with support from a sufficiently resourced and adequately trained multidisciplinary team. Improving physical health remains fundamental to eating disorder recovery, though psychological support is also essential to understand what causes and maintains the eating disorder and to facilitate a shift away from an eating disorder dominated identity. Carers and peers who instil hope and offer empathy and validation are valuable additional sources of support. Future research should explore what works best for whom and why, evaluating patient and carer focused psychological interventions and dietetic support during intensive treatment. Future research should also explore the long-term effects of, at times, coercive and distressing treatment practices and determine how to mitigate against potential iatrogenic harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":48605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"12 1","pages":"115"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01061-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Eating disorders are complex difficulties that impact the individual, their supporters and society. Increasing numbers are being admitted to intensive treatment settings (e.g., for inpatient treatment, day-patient treatment or acute medical treatment). The lived experience perspectives of what helps and hinders eating disorder recovery during intensive treatment is an emerging area of interest. This review aims to explore patients' perspectives of what helps and hinders recovery in these contexts.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies using qualitative methods to explore patients' experiences of intensive treatment for an eating disorder. Article quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP) checklist and thematic synthesis was used to analyse the primary research and develop overarching analytical themes.

Results: Thirty articles met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The methodological quality was mostly good. Thematic synthesis generated six main themes; collaborative care supports recovery; a safe and terrifying environment; negotiating identity; supporting mind and body; the need for specialist support; and the value of close others. The included articles focused predominantly on specialist inpatient care and were from eight different countries. One clear limitation was that ethnicity data were not reported in 22 out of the 30 studies. When ethnicity data were reported, participants predominantly identified as white.

Conclusions: This review identifies that a person-centred, biopsychosocial approach is necessary throughout all stages of eating disorder treatment, with support from a sufficiently resourced and adequately trained multidisciplinary team. Improving physical health remains fundamental to eating disorder recovery, though psychological support is also essential to understand what causes and maintains the eating disorder and to facilitate a shift away from an eating disorder dominated identity. Carers and peers who instil hope and offer empathy and validation are valuable additional sources of support. Future research should explore what works best for whom and why, evaluating patient and carer focused psychological interventions and dietetic support during intensive treatment. Future research should also explore the long-term effects of, at times, coercive and distressing treatment practices and determine how to mitigate against potential iatrogenic harm.

饮食失调症患者接受强化治疗的经历:系统综述和专题综合。
背景:进食障碍是一种复杂的疾病,对个人、其支持者和社会都有影响。越来越多的人被送进强化治疗机构(如住院治疗、日间留院治疗或急性病治疗)。从生活经验的角度来看,在强化治疗期间,哪些因素有助于和阻碍饮食失调症的康复,是一个新兴的关注领域。本综述旨在探讨患者对这些情况下哪些因素有助于和阻碍康复的看法:方法:我们进行了一项系统性综述,以确定采用定性方法探讨患者在饮食失调强化治疗中的经历的研究。采用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)核对表对文章质量进行评估,并采用主题综合法对主要研究进行分析,制定总体分析主题:结果:30 篇文章符合纳入标准并被纳入本综述。大部分文章的研究方法质量良好。专题综合产生了六个主要专题:合作护理支持康复;安全和令人恐惧的环境;协商身份;支持身心;需要专家支持;亲密他人的价值。收录的文章主要集中在专科住院护理方面,来自八个不同的国家。一个明显的局限是,30 项研究中有 22 项未报告种族数据。当报告了种族数据时,参与者主要被认定为白人:本综述指出,在资源充足、训练有素的多学科团队的支持下,以人为本的生物心理社会方法在饮食失调治疗的各个阶段都是必要的。改善身体健康仍然是饮食失调症康复的基础,但心理支持对于了解饮食失调症的起因和维持因素以及促进饮食失调症患者摆脱饮食失调症主导身份也是至关重要的。能给患者带来希望、给予同情和肯定的照顾者和同伴是宝贵的额外支持来源。未来的研究应探索哪些方法对谁最有效以及为什么有效,评估以患者和照顾者为重点的心理干预措施和强化治疗期间的饮食支持。未来的研究还应该探讨有时是强制性和令人痛苦的治疗方法的长期影响,并确定如何减轻潜在的先天性伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Eating Disorders
Journal of Eating Disorders Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
17.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Eating Disorders is the first open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing leading research in the science and clinical practice of eating disorders. It disseminates research that provides answers to the important issues and key challenges in the field of eating disorders and to facilitate translation of evidence into practice. The journal publishes research on all aspects of eating disorders namely their epidemiology, nature, determinants, neurobiology, prevention, treatment and outcomes. The scope includes, but is not limited to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other eating disorders. Related areas such as important co-morbidities, obesity, body image, appetite, food and eating are also included. Articles about research methodology and assessment are welcomed where they advance the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信