[Distribution and antibiotic resistance analysis of Gram positive cocci in bloodstream infections in a hospital in Inner Mongolia].

Q3 Medicine
L L Tian, B B Xing, Y M Zhang, J P Zhao
{"title":"[Distribution and antibiotic resistance analysis of Gram positive cocci in bloodstream infections in a hospital in Inner Mongolia].","authors":"L L Tian, B B Xing, Y M Zhang, J P Zhao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20231120-00354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the strain composition and drug resistance characteristics of G<sup>+</sup>(Gram positive cocci) cocci causing bloodstream infections in the People's Hospital of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in recent years and provide a basis for the empirical and rational use of drugs for the prevention and treatment of bloodstream infections caused by G<sup>+</sup>cocci. The strain composition and drug-resistant characteristics of G<sup>+</sup>cocci isolated from positive blood culture specimens sent to various departments of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital from January 2015 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, and the higher detection rates of Staphylococcus hominis and Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) were examined. MRSA and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) were comparatively analyzed for resistance. The resistance data were analyzed by Whonet 5.6 statistical software, the significance of difference was analyzed by SPSS 22.0 software, and the resistance rate was compared by <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> test. The results showed that 1 209 strains of G<sup>+</sup>cocci, in terms of the composition ratio, from high to low, were mainly human staphylococci (32.5%,393/1 209), Staphylococcus epidermidis (27.8%, 336/1 209), Staphylococcus aureus (14.9%,180/1 209) and Enterococcus faecalis (10.6%, 128/1 209). Among them, the detection rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (42.8%, 77/180) was lower than that of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcus (MRCNS) (71.5%, 608/850); and among enterococci, the detection rate of Enterococcus faecalis (71.5%, 128/179) was much higher than that of Enterococcus faecalis (28.5%, 51/179). For drug resistance, the resistance rate to five commonly used antimicrobial drugs, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, clindamycin and tetracycline, was higher in Staphylococcus hominis than in Staphylococcus epidermidis (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=7.152-64.080, <i>P</i><0.05); however, for the aminoglycoside antimicrobial drug gentamicin, the rate of resistance in Staphylococcus humanus was lower than in Staphylococcus epidermidis, and the difference was statistically significant (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=11.895, <i>P<</i>0.05); no strains resistant to linezolid and vancomycin were found in both. Comparison of the resistance rates to seven antimicrobial drugs, gentamicin, rifampicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, clindamycin and tetracycline, was significantly higher in MRSA than in MSSA (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=6.169-56.941, <i>P</i><0.05); however, the resistance rate to cotrimoxazole, MRSA (15.6%, 12/77) was significantly lower than that of MSSA (35.3%, 36/102), and the difference was statistically significant (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=5.155, <i>P<</i>0.05); MRSA and MSSA resistant to linezolid and vancomycin were not found. The resistance rate of Enterococcus faecalis to penicillin G and ampicillin was much higher than that of Enterococcus faecalis, and the difference was statistically significant (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=22.965, <i>P</i><0.05), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were not found. In conclusion, for staphylococci, except for individual antibiotics, S.hominis and MRSA were more resistant to most antimicrobial drugs than S. epidermidis and MSSA, showing a multidrug-resistant pattern. For enterococci, except for penicillin G and ampicillin resistance rate, Enterococcus faecalis is much higher than Enterococcus faecalis, the rest of the antimicrobial drugs did not see a significant difference, in addition to vancomycin-resistant enterococci were not detected. Clinicians should pay great attention to the monitoring data of multidrug-resistant G<sup>+</sup>cocci isolated from blood cultures to provide a basis for empirical and rational use of drugs in the clinic, to effectively prevent and reduce the incidence of bloodstream infections caused by G<sup>+</sup>cocci.</p>","PeriodicalId":24033,"journal":{"name":"中华预防医学杂志","volume":"58 8","pages":"1242-1246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华预防医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20231120-00354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the strain composition and drug resistance characteristics of G+(Gram positive cocci) cocci causing bloodstream infections in the People's Hospital of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in recent years and provide a basis for the empirical and rational use of drugs for the prevention and treatment of bloodstream infections caused by G+cocci. The strain composition and drug-resistant characteristics of G+cocci isolated from positive blood culture specimens sent to various departments of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital from January 2015 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, and the higher detection rates of Staphylococcus hominis and Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) were examined. MRSA and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) were comparatively analyzed for resistance. The resistance data were analyzed by Whonet 5.6 statistical software, the significance of difference was analyzed by SPSS 22.0 software, and the resistance rate was compared by χ2 test. The results showed that 1 209 strains of G+cocci, in terms of the composition ratio, from high to low, were mainly human staphylococci (32.5%,393/1 209), Staphylococcus epidermidis (27.8%, 336/1 209), Staphylococcus aureus (14.9%,180/1 209) and Enterococcus faecalis (10.6%, 128/1 209). Among them, the detection rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (42.8%, 77/180) was lower than that of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcus (MRCNS) (71.5%, 608/850); and among enterococci, the detection rate of Enterococcus faecalis (71.5%, 128/179) was much higher than that of Enterococcus faecalis (28.5%, 51/179). For drug resistance, the resistance rate to five commonly used antimicrobial drugs, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, clindamycin and tetracycline, was higher in Staphylococcus hominis than in Staphylococcus epidermidis (χ2=7.152-64.080, P<0.05); however, for the aminoglycoside antimicrobial drug gentamicin, the rate of resistance in Staphylococcus humanus was lower than in Staphylococcus epidermidis, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=11.895, P<0.05); no strains resistant to linezolid and vancomycin were found in both. Comparison of the resistance rates to seven antimicrobial drugs, gentamicin, rifampicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, clindamycin and tetracycline, was significantly higher in MRSA than in MSSA (χ2=6.169-56.941, P<0.05); however, the resistance rate to cotrimoxazole, MRSA (15.6%, 12/77) was significantly lower than that of MSSA (35.3%, 36/102), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.155, P<0.05); MRSA and MSSA resistant to linezolid and vancomycin were not found. The resistance rate of Enterococcus faecalis to penicillin G and ampicillin was much higher than that of Enterococcus faecalis, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=22.965, P<0.05), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were not found. In conclusion, for staphylococci, except for individual antibiotics, S.hominis and MRSA were more resistant to most antimicrobial drugs than S. epidermidis and MSSA, showing a multidrug-resistant pattern. For enterococci, except for penicillin G and ampicillin resistance rate, Enterococcus faecalis is much higher than Enterococcus faecalis, the rest of the antimicrobial drugs did not see a significant difference, in addition to vancomycin-resistant enterococci were not detected. Clinicians should pay great attention to the monitoring data of multidrug-resistant G+cocci isolated from blood cultures to provide a basis for empirical and rational use of drugs in the clinic, to effectively prevent and reduce the incidence of bloodstream infections caused by G+cocci.

[内蒙古某医院血流感染中革兰氏阳性球菌的分布及抗生素耐药性分析]。
摘要】 目的 探讨近年来内蒙古自治区人民医院引起血流感染的G+(革兰阳性球菌)球菌的菌株组成及耐药特点,为防治G+球菌引起的血流感染的经验性合理用药提供依据。回顾性分析了2015年1月至2022年12月送往内蒙古自治区人民医院各科室血液培养阳性标本中分离出的G+球菌的菌株组成和耐药特征、并考察了人葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌、粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)的较高检出率。对 MRSA 和对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)的耐药性进行了比较分析。耐药性数据采用 Whonet 5.6 统计软件进行分析,差异显著性采用 SPSS 22.0 软件进行分析,耐药率比较采用 χ2 检验。结果表明,1 209 株 G+occi 菌株中,从构成比来看,由高到低主要为人葡萄球菌(32.5%,393/1 209)、表皮葡萄球菌(27.8%,336/1 209)、金黄色葡萄球菌(14.9%,180/1 209)和粪肠球菌(10.6%,128/1 209)。其中,耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的检出率(42.8%,77/180)低于耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(MRCNS)的检出率(71.5%,608/850);在肠球菌中,粪肠球菌的检出率(71.5%,128/179)远高于粪肠球菌(28.5%,51/179)。耐药性方面,同种葡萄球菌对环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星、莫西沙星、克林霉素和四环素五种常用抗菌药物的耐药率高于表皮葡萄球菌(χ2=7.152-64.080,Pχ2=11.895,P0.05);两者均未发现对利奈唑胺和万古霉素耐药的菌株。比较对庆大霉素、利福平、环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星、莫西沙星、克林霉素和四环素7种抗菌药物的耐药率,MRSA明显高于MSSA(χ2=6.169-56.941,Pχ2=5.155,P0.05);未发现对利奈唑胺和万古霉素耐药的MRSA和MSSA。粪肠球菌对青霉素G和氨苄西林的耐药率远高于粪肠球菌,差异有统计学意义(χ2=22.965,从血培养物中分离出的P+球菌为临床经验性合理用药提供依据,有效预防和降低G+球菌引起的血流感染发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华预防医学杂志
中华预防医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12678
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine (CJPM), the successor to Chinese Health Journal , was initiated on October 1, 1953. In 1960, it was amalgamated with the Chinese Medical Journal and the Journal of Medical History and Health Care , and thereafter, was renamed as People’s Care . On November 25, 1978, the publication was denominated as Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine . The contents of CJPM deal with a wide range of disciplines and technologies including epidemiology, environmental health, nutrition and food hygiene, occupational health, hygiene for children and adolescents, radiological health, toxicology, biostatistics, social medicine, pathogenic and epidemiological research in malignant tumor, surveillance and immunization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信