Dose dense versus 3 weekly AC during neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for triple negative breast cancer.

IF 6.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Renata Colombo Bonadio, Isadora Martins de Sousa, Flávia Cavalcanti Balint, Ana Carolina Marin Comini, Monique Celeste Tavares, Fernanda Madasi, Jose Bines, Rafael Dal Ponte Ferreira, Daniela Dornelles Rosa, Candice Lima Santos, Zenaide Silva de Souza, Daniele Assad-Suzuki, Júlio Antônio Pereira de Araújo, Débora de Melo Gagliato, Carlos Henrique Dos Anjos, Bruna M Zucchetti, Anezka Ferrari, Mayana Lopes de Brito, Renata Cangussu, Maria Marcela Fernandes Monteiro, Paulo M Hoff, Laura Testa, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa
{"title":"Dose dense versus 3 weekly AC during neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for triple negative breast cancer.","authors":"Renata Colombo Bonadio, Isadora Martins de Sousa, Flávia Cavalcanti Balint, Ana Carolina Marin Comini, Monique Celeste Tavares, Fernanda Madasi, Jose Bines, Rafael Dal Ponte Ferreira, Daniela Dornelles Rosa, Candice Lima Santos, Zenaide Silva de Souza, Daniele Assad-Suzuki, Júlio Antônio Pereira de Araújo, Débora de Melo Gagliato, Carlos Henrique Dos Anjos, Bruna M Zucchetti, Anezka Ferrari, Mayana Lopes de Brito, Renata Cangussu, Maria Marcela Fernandes Monteiro, Paulo M Hoff, Laura Testa, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa","doi":"10.1038/s41523-024-00676-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (P + CT) has emerged as a standard of care for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the best anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) schedule remains to be determined. While the KEYNOTE-522 regimen employs AC every 3 weeks (q3w AC), previous studies have shown overall survival benefits of dose-dense regimens for early-stage breast cancer. The Neo-Real study (GBECAM-0123) is a real-world data effort evaluating patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant P + CT in ten cancer centers since July 2020. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dose-dense AC (ddAC) versus q3w AC. Among 333 patients included until November 2023, 311 completed neoadjuvant therapy and 279 underwent surgery with pathology reports available; ddAC was used in 58.2% and q3w AC in 41.8% of the cases. Most patients (69.1%) had stage II TNBC. A pCR was observed in 65.4% with ddAC and 58.7% with q3w AC (P = 0.260), while RCB 0-1 occurred in 82.4% and 73.5%, respectively (P = 0.115). Patients with stage III disease had a numerically higher pCR with ddAC (59% vs 40%, P = 0.155), while pCR rates were similar regardless of AC regimen in stage II disease (66.6% vs 64.5%; P = 0.760). While no significant disparities in drug discontinuation was noted, ddAC showed a trend towards higher rates of grade ≥3 AE (40.5% vs. 30.7%, P = 0.092). The Neo-Real study could not rule out a difference between ddAC and q3w AC during neoadjuvant P + CT. The observation of a potentially higher pCR with ddAC in stage III disease warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19247,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Breast Cancer","volume":"10 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-024-00676-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (P + CT) has emerged as a standard of care for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the best anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) schedule remains to be determined. While the KEYNOTE-522 regimen employs AC every 3 weeks (q3w AC), previous studies have shown overall survival benefits of dose-dense regimens for early-stage breast cancer. The Neo-Real study (GBECAM-0123) is a real-world data effort evaluating patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant P + CT in ten cancer centers since July 2020. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dose-dense AC (ddAC) versus q3w AC. Among 333 patients included until November 2023, 311 completed neoadjuvant therapy and 279 underwent surgery with pathology reports available; ddAC was used in 58.2% and q3w AC in 41.8% of the cases. Most patients (69.1%) had stage II TNBC. A pCR was observed in 65.4% with ddAC and 58.7% with q3w AC (P = 0.260), while RCB 0-1 occurred in 82.4% and 73.5%, respectively (P = 0.115). Patients with stage III disease had a numerically higher pCR with ddAC (59% vs 40%, P = 0.155), while pCR rates were similar regardless of AC regimen in stage II disease (66.6% vs 64.5%; P = 0.760). While no significant disparities in drug discontinuation was noted, ddAC showed a trend towards higher rates of grade ≥3 AE (40.5% vs. 30.7%, P = 0.092). The Neo-Real study could not rule out a difference between ddAC and q3w AC during neoadjuvant P + CT. The observation of a potentially higher pCR with ddAC in stage III disease warrants further investigation.

Abstract Image

在三阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗免疫疗法期间,剂量密集与每周三次 AC 的对比。
新辅助pembrolizumab+化疗(P+CT)已成为II-III期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的标准治疗方法。然而,最佳的蒽环类-环磷酰胺(AC)方案仍有待确定。虽然 KEYNOTE-522 方案采用每 3 周一次的 AC(q3w AC),但之前的研究显示,剂量密集型方案对早期乳腺癌患者的总体生存有好处。Neo-Real研究(GBECAM-0123)是一项真实世界数据工作,评估了自2020年7月以来在10个癌症中心接受新辅助P+CT治疗的TNBC患者。这项分析的目的是评估剂量密集 AC(ddAC)与 q3w AC 的有效性和安全性。在截至2023年11月纳入的333例患者中,311例完成了新辅助治疗,279例接受了手术,并提供了病理报告;58.2%的病例使用了ddAC,41.8%的病例使用了q3w AC。大多数患者(69.1%)为 TNBC II 期。65.4%的患者采用ddAC,58.7%的患者采用q3w AC,观察到pCR(P = 0.260),而RCB 0-1的患者分别占82.4%和73.5%(P = 0.115)。III 期患者使用 ddAC 的 pCR 率更高一些(59% vs 40%,P = 0.155),而 II 期患者无论使用哪种 AC 方案,pCR 率都相似(66.6% vs 64.5%;P = 0.760)。虽然在停药方面没有发现明显差异,但ddAC显示出≥3级AE发生率较高的趋势(40.5% vs. 30.7%,P = 0.092)。Neo-Real研究不能排除新辅助P+CT期间ddAC与q3w AC之间的差异。在 III 期疾病中,观察到 ddAC 的 pCR 可能更高,这值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Breast Cancer
NPJ Breast Cancer Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Breast Cancer publishes original research articles, reviews, brief correspondence, meeting reports, editorial summaries and hypothesis generating observations which could be unexplained or preliminary findings from experiments, novel ideas, or the framing of new questions that need to be solved. Featured topics of the journal include imaging, immunotherapy, molecular classification of disease, mechanism-based therapies largely targeting signal transduction pathways, carcinogenesis including hereditary susceptibility and molecular epidemiology, survivorship issues including long-term toxicities of treatment and secondary neoplasm occurrence, the biophysics of cancer, mechanisms of metastasis and their perturbation, and studies of the tumor microenvironment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信