Patient perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer diagnosis on MRI.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-11012-y
Stefan J Fransen, T C Kwee, D Rouw, C Roest, Q Y van Lohuizen, F F J Simonis, P J van Leeuwen, S Heijmink, Y P Ongena, M Haan, D Yakar
{"title":"Patient perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer diagnosis on MRI.","authors":"Stefan J Fransen, T C Kwee, D Rouw, C Roest, Q Y van Lohuizen, F F J Simonis, P J van Leeuwen, S Heijmink, Y P Ongena, M Haan, D Yakar","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11012-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated patients' acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa) on MRI scans and the factors influencing their trust in AI diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective, multicenter study was conducted between January and November 2023. Patients undergoing prostate MRI were surveyed about their opinions on hypothetical AI assessment of their MRI scans. The questionnaire included nine items: four on hypothetical scenarios of combinations between AI and the radiologist, two on trust in the diagnosis, and three on accountability for misdiagnosis. Relationships between the items and independent variables were assessed using multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 212 PCa suspicious patients undergoing prostate MRI were included. The majority preferred AI involvement in their PCa diagnosis alongside a radiologist, with 91% agreeing with AI as the primary reader and 79% as the secondary reader. If AI has a high certainty diagnosis, 15% of the respondents would accept it as the sole decision-maker. Autonomous AI outperforming radiologists would be accepted by 52%. Higher educated persons tended to accept AI when it would outperform radiologists (p < 0.05). The respondents indicated that the hospital (76%), radiologist (70%), and program developer (55%) should be held accountable for misdiagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients favor AI involvement alongside radiologists in PCa diagnosis. Trust in AI diagnosis depends on the patient's education level and the AI performance, with autonomous AI acceptance by a small majority on the condition that AI outperforms a radiologist. Respondents held the hospital, radiologist, and program developers accountable for misdiagnosis in descending order of accountability.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>Patients show a high level of acceptance for AI-assisted prostate cancer diagnosis on MRI, either alongside radiologists or fully autonomous, particularly if it demonstrates superior performance to radiologists alone.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Prostate cancer suspicious patients may accept autonomous AI based on performance. Patients prefer AI involvement alongside a radiologist in diagnosing prostate cancer. Patients indicate accountability for AI should be shared among multiple stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"769-775"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11012-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated patients' acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa) on MRI scans and the factors influencing their trust in AI diagnoses.

Materials and methods: A prospective, multicenter study was conducted between January and November 2023. Patients undergoing prostate MRI were surveyed about their opinions on hypothetical AI assessment of their MRI scans. The questionnaire included nine items: four on hypothetical scenarios of combinations between AI and the radiologist, two on trust in the diagnosis, and three on accountability for misdiagnosis. Relationships between the items and independent variables were assessed using multivariate analysis.

Results: A total of 212 PCa suspicious patients undergoing prostate MRI were included. The majority preferred AI involvement in their PCa diagnosis alongside a radiologist, with 91% agreeing with AI as the primary reader and 79% as the secondary reader. If AI has a high certainty diagnosis, 15% of the respondents would accept it as the sole decision-maker. Autonomous AI outperforming radiologists would be accepted by 52%. Higher educated persons tended to accept AI when it would outperform radiologists (p < 0.05). The respondents indicated that the hospital (76%), radiologist (70%), and program developer (55%) should be held accountable for misdiagnosis.

Conclusions: Patients favor AI involvement alongside radiologists in PCa diagnosis. Trust in AI diagnosis depends on the patient's education level and the AI performance, with autonomous AI acceptance by a small majority on the condition that AI outperforms a radiologist. Respondents held the hospital, radiologist, and program developers accountable for misdiagnosis in descending order of accountability.

Clinical relevance statement: Patients show a high level of acceptance for AI-assisted prostate cancer diagnosis on MRI, either alongside radiologists or fully autonomous, particularly if it demonstrates superior performance to radiologists alone.

Key points: Prostate cancer suspicious patients may accept autonomous AI based on performance. Patients prefer AI involvement alongside a radiologist in diagnosing prostate cancer. Patients indicate accountability for AI should be shared among multiple stakeholders.

Abstract Image

患者对在核磁共振成像上使用人工智能诊断前列腺癌的看法。
研究目的本研究调查了患者对通过核磁共振扫描诊断前列腺癌(PCa)的人工智能(AI)的接受程度,以及影响他们信任人工智能诊断的因素:一项前瞻性多中心研究于 2023 年 1 月至 11 月间进行。对接受前列腺磁共振成像检查的患者进行了调查,了解他们对磁共振成像扫描的假定人工智能评估的意见。问卷包括九个项目:四个关于人工智能和放射科医生之间组合的假设情景,两个关于对诊断的信任,三个关于对误诊的责任。通过多变量分析评估了这些项目与自变量之间的关系:共纳入了 212 名接受前列腺 MRI 检查的 PCa 可疑患者。大多数患者希望人工智能与放射科医生一起参与 PCa 诊断,91% 的患者同意人工智能作为主要阅读者,79% 的患者同意人工智能作为辅助阅读者。如果人工智能的诊断确定性很高,15% 的受访者会接受人工智能作为唯一的决策者。52%的受访者会接受比放射科医生更优秀的自主人工智能。受教育程度较高的受访者倾向于接受人工智能的诊断结果优于放射科医生的诊断结果(p 结论):患者赞成人工智能与放射科医生一起参与 PCa 诊断。对人工智能诊断的信任取决于患者的教育水平和人工智能的表现,只有当人工智能的表现优于放射科医生时,才会有少数人自主接受人工智能。受访者认为医院、放射科医生和程序开发人员对误诊负有责任的程度依次递减:患者对人工智能辅助核磁共振诊断前列腺癌的接受度很高,无论是与放射科医生一起诊断还是完全自主诊断,尤其是当其表现出优于放射科医生单独诊断时:要点:前列腺癌疑似患者可根据表现接受自主人工智能。患者倾向于人工智能与放射科医生一起参与前列腺癌的诊断。患者表示人工智能的责任应由多个利益相关者共同承担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信