British and Irish orchids in a changing world – an update

Michael F. Fay, Jacopo Calevo
{"title":"British and Irish orchids in a changing world – an update","authors":"Michael F. Fay,&nbsp;Jacopo Calevo","doi":"10.1111/curt.12576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With just over 50 native orchid species in Britain, of which approximately 30 occur in Ireland, the orchid floras of Britain and Ireland are not as rich as those of most other countries in Western Europe (Italy, for example, has &gt;200 native orchid species), although they include representatives of all three subfamilies found in Europe: Cypripedioideae (just in Britain), Orchidoideae and Epidendroideae. Exact numbers of species vary depending on the taxonomic system followed, but Bateman (<span>2022</span>), for example, stated that 53 native species occur in Britain and Ireland. The numbers are also in flux as long-term natives go extinct or new species arrive from the Continent; for example, <i>Spiranthes aestivalis</i> (Poir.) Rich. (<span>summer ladies' tresses</span>) was last seen in England in the 1950s, and <i>Epipogium aphyllum</i> Sw. (<span>ghost orchid</span>) may also be regionally extinct, whereas species of <i>Serapias</i> L. (<span>tongue orchids</span>) are among recent newly recorded orchids in Britain (see discussion in Bateman, <span>2022</span>).</p><p>Despite (or maybe because of) the relatively low number of species, British and Irish orchids are well studied, and the data available from these studies provide useful information relating to the effects of habitat loss and climate change. This is important, because due to their complex life histories (including their pollination syndromes and their dependence on mycorrhizal fungi for nutrition for at least a part of their life cycle), orchids have been suggested to be at particular risk to environmental change by authors including Dixon &amp; Swarts (<span>2009</span>), who wrote that “it is likely that orchids, more than any other plant family, will be in the front-line of species to suffer large-scale extinction events as a result of climate change”. More recently, Fay (<span>2022</span>, p. 9) wrote that “orchids are a fascinating group of plants, but they can also be seen as the plant equivalent of the ‘canary in the coalmine’ – due to their complex interactions with fungi and pollinators, many may be among the first casualties of declines in ecosystem health.</p><p>An important long-term study studying the effect of climate change on orchids was published by Hutchings et al. (<span>2018</span>). The authors used data on flowering time for an amazing 356 years in <i>Ophrys sphegodes</i> Mill. (<span>early spider orchid</span>) in England and equivalent data on bee emergence time to demonstrate that the pollination mechanism in this species is vulnerable to climate change, with the phenology of the partners (the orchid and the pollinator) changing in different ways in response to warmer springs; the results of this study led the authors to conclude that “continuing warming will increase the frequency of years in which this rare orchid suffers complete reproductive failure”.</p><p>Climate change could also have a severe impact on the capacity of orchids to form the mycorrhizal associations on which their continued existence depends. The fungi that form mycorrhizal associations with orchids are (mostly) capable of surviving as free-living organisms, but if climate change leads to the environment no longer being suitable for the orchids in question or that the appropriate fungus no longer co-occurs with the orchids, then there is a potential for collapse of populations of the orchids or even extinction. In addition to affecting plants, climate change can lead to shifts in the geographical range of fungi, affecting their diversity and abundance and influencing their interactions with plants, and we know little, if anything, about the effect of climate change on the mycorrhizal fungi with which orchids associate. In one of our current projects (‘FORECAST - Quantifying the impact of climate change on orchid mycorrhizal symbiosis in Mediterranean biodiversity hotspots’), we are examining the potential effect of climate change on orchids and their mycorrhizal fungi under a range of climate change models, and the data from this project could be used to direct assisted migration or appropriate <i>ex situ</i> conservation activities for the orchids.</p><p>In 2015, Fay (<span>2015</span>) summarised information about the status of British and Irish orchid species, in a themed issue of <i>Curtis's Botanical Magazine</i> (Vol. 32, Part 1, with eight species accounts), identifying (potential) ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ in response to climate change and other threats. Here we publish accounts for a further ten native species, including six and four representatives of subfamilies Orchidoideae and Epidendroideae, respectively; the sole member of Cypripedioideae (<i>Cypripedium calceolus</i> L., <span>lady's slipper orchid</span>) was one of the species featured in the 2015 issue (Fay &amp; Taylor, <span>2015</span>).</p><p>Eight of the ten species are illustrated with plates based on plants growing on the island of Lindisfarne by the artist Reinhild Raistrick, and these paintings are part of set illustrating all the orchids native to the island. <i>Spiranthes spiralis</i> (L.) Chevall. (<span>autumn lady's tresses</span>) is painted by Joanna Langhorne, based on material from Devon, and <i>Platanthera chlorantha</i> (Custer) Rchb. (<span>greater butterfly orchid</span>) is illustrated with an historical plate from <i>Flora Danica</i>.</p><p>Pollination mechanisms in the illustrated species vary, with some being food deceptive (e.g. <i>Dactylorhiza incarnata</i> (L.) Soó, <span>early marsh orchid</span>, and <i>D. purpurella</i> (T.Stephenson &amp; T.A.Stephenson) Soó, <span>northern marsh orchid</span>) and some being rewarding (e.g. <i>Platanthera chlorantha</i> and <i>Neottia ovata</i> (L.) Hartm., <span>twayblade</span>). <i>Ophrys apifera</i> Huds. (<span>bee orchid</span>) is unusual in being (at least predominantly) self-pollinating, in contrast to other species of <i>Ophrys</i> L. which are sexually deceptive.</p><p>Ease of cultivation also varies, and most should be regarded as subjects for specialist collections. Some like <i>D. purpurella</i> and <i>O. apifera</i> can make good garden subjects, whereas others, notably <i>Corallorhiza trifida</i> Châtel., are (almost) impossible to cultivate; in the case of <i>C. trifida</i>, this is a result of its obligate mycoheterotrophy (it is dependent on a fungal associate for much of its nutrition). For most readers, the species included here should be considered as species to be enjoyed in nature.</p><p>Biodiversity in general is currently subject to an unprecedented range of threats, and orchids are a group of plants on which these threats are likely to have a great impact. Current red listing activity shows that a higher proportion of orchids are under threat of extinction than plants in general (e.g. Fay, <span>2022</span>), and we hope that by bringing attention to these charismatic plants and the threats to which they are exposed, we will contribute to their conservation, safeguarding them for future generations to enjoy.</p><p>Jacopo Calevo was funded by a European Commission Marie Skłodowska-Curie Global Fellowship (grant agreement No. 101031324 “FORECAST”). We thank the artists Reinhild Raistrick and Joanna Langhorne for the new artwork, and Julia Buckley (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew) for her assistance in sourcing illustrations including the black-and-white drawings of Stella Ross-Craig. Our co-authors made contributions to the texts that have improved the quality of the accounts. We thank Maarten Christenhusz for granting permission to use some of his photographs We also thank our collaborators Kingsley Dixon, Karl Duffy, Maarten Christenhusz and Mark Chase for useful discussions. Finally, we acknowledge the major contribution that Martyn Rix has made as Chief Editor of <i>Curtis's Botanical Magazine</i> over so many years.</p>","PeriodicalId":100348,"journal":{"name":"Curtis's Botanical Magazine","volume":"41 2","pages":"177-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/curt.12576","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curtis's Botanical Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/curt.12576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With just over 50 native orchid species in Britain, of which approximately 30 occur in Ireland, the orchid floras of Britain and Ireland are not as rich as those of most other countries in Western Europe (Italy, for example, has >200 native orchid species), although they include representatives of all three subfamilies found in Europe: Cypripedioideae (just in Britain), Orchidoideae and Epidendroideae. Exact numbers of species vary depending on the taxonomic system followed, but Bateman (2022), for example, stated that 53 native species occur in Britain and Ireland. The numbers are also in flux as long-term natives go extinct or new species arrive from the Continent; for example, Spiranthes aestivalis (Poir.) Rich. (summer ladies' tresses) was last seen in England in the 1950s, and Epipogium aphyllum Sw. (ghost orchid) may also be regionally extinct, whereas species of Serapias L. (tongue orchids) are among recent newly recorded orchids in Britain (see discussion in Bateman, 2022).

Despite (or maybe because of) the relatively low number of species, British and Irish orchids are well studied, and the data available from these studies provide useful information relating to the effects of habitat loss and climate change. This is important, because due to their complex life histories (including their pollination syndromes and their dependence on mycorrhizal fungi for nutrition for at least a part of their life cycle), orchids have been suggested to be at particular risk to environmental change by authors including Dixon & Swarts (2009), who wrote that “it is likely that orchids, more than any other plant family, will be in the front-line of species to suffer large-scale extinction events as a result of climate change”. More recently, Fay (2022, p. 9) wrote that “orchids are a fascinating group of plants, but they can also be seen as the plant equivalent of the ‘canary in the coalmine’ – due to their complex interactions with fungi and pollinators, many may be among the first casualties of declines in ecosystem health.

An important long-term study studying the effect of climate change on orchids was published by Hutchings et al. (2018). The authors used data on flowering time for an amazing 356 years in Ophrys sphegodes Mill. (early spider orchid) in England and equivalent data on bee emergence time to demonstrate that the pollination mechanism in this species is vulnerable to climate change, with the phenology of the partners (the orchid and the pollinator) changing in different ways in response to warmer springs; the results of this study led the authors to conclude that “continuing warming will increase the frequency of years in which this rare orchid suffers complete reproductive failure”.

Climate change could also have a severe impact on the capacity of orchids to form the mycorrhizal associations on which their continued existence depends. The fungi that form mycorrhizal associations with orchids are (mostly) capable of surviving as free-living organisms, but if climate change leads to the environment no longer being suitable for the orchids in question or that the appropriate fungus no longer co-occurs with the orchids, then there is a potential for collapse of populations of the orchids or even extinction. In addition to affecting plants, climate change can lead to shifts in the geographical range of fungi, affecting their diversity and abundance and influencing their interactions with plants, and we know little, if anything, about the effect of climate change on the mycorrhizal fungi with which orchids associate. In one of our current projects (‘FORECAST - Quantifying the impact of climate change on orchid mycorrhizal symbiosis in Mediterranean biodiversity hotspots’), we are examining the potential effect of climate change on orchids and their mycorrhizal fungi under a range of climate change models, and the data from this project could be used to direct assisted migration or appropriate ex situ conservation activities for the orchids.

In 2015, Fay (2015) summarised information about the status of British and Irish orchid species, in a themed issue of Curtis's Botanical Magazine (Vol. 32, Part 1, with eight species accounts), identifying (potential) ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ in response to climate change and other threats. Here we publish accounts for a further ten native species, including six and four representatives of subfamilies Orchidoideae and Epidendroideae, respectively; the sole member of Cypripedioideae (Cypripedium calceolus L., lady's slipper orchid) was one of the species featured in the 2015 issue (Fay & Taylor, 2015).

Eight of the ten species are illustrated with plates based on plants growing on the island of Lindisfarne by the artist Reinhild Raistrick, and these paintings are part of set illustrating all the orchids native to the island. Spiranthes spiralis (L.) Chevall. (autumn lady's tresses) is painted by Joanna Langhorne, based on material from Devon, and Platanthera chlorantha (Custer) Rchb. (greater butterfly orchid) is illustrated with an historical plate from Flora Danica.

Pollination mechanisms in the illustrated species vary, with some being food deceptive (e.g. Dactylorhiza incarnata (L.) Soó, early marsh orchid, and D. purpurella (T.Stephenson & T.A.Stephenson) Soó, northern marsh orchid) and some being rewarding (e.g. Platanthera chlorantha and Neottia ovata (L.) Hartm., twayblade). Ophrys apifera Huds. (bee orchid) is unusual in being (at least predominantly) self-pollinating, in contrast to other species of Ophrys L. which are sexually deceptive.

Ease of cultivation also varies, and most should be regarded as subjects for specialist collections. Some like D. purpurella and O. apifera can make good garden subjects, whereas others, notably Corallorhiza trifida Châtel., are (almost) impossible to cultivate; in the case of C. trifida, this is a result of its obligate mycoheterotrophy (it is dependent on a fungal associate for much of its nutrition). For most readers, the species included here should be considered as species to be enjoyed in nature.

Biodiversity in general is currently subject to an unprecedented range of threats, and orchids are a group of plants on which these threats are likely to have a great impact. Current red listing activity shows that a higher proportion of orchids are under threat of extinction than plants in general (e.g. Fay, 2022), and we hope that by bringing attention to these charismatic plants and the threats to which they are exposed, we will contribute to their conservation, safeguarding them for future generations to enjoy.

Jacopo Calevo was funded by a European Commission Marie Skłodowska-Curie Global Fellowship (grant agreement No. 101031324 “FORECAST”). We thank the artists Reinhild Raistrick and Joanna Langhorne for the new artwork, and Julia Buckley (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew) for her assistance in sourcing illustrations including the black-and-white drawings of Stella Ross-Craig. Our co-authors made contributions to the texts that have improved the quality of the accounts. We thank Maarten Christenhusz for granting permission to use some of his photographs We also thank our collaborators Kingsley Dixon, Karl Duffy, Maarten Christenhusz and Mark Chase for useful discussions. Finally, we acknowledge the major contribution that Martyn Rix has made as Chief Editor of Curtis's Botanical Magazine over so many years.

变化世界中的英国和爱尔兰兰花--最新情况
英国仅有 50 多个原生兰花物种,其中约 30 个出现在爱尔兰,英国和爱尔兰的兰花植物区系不如西欧大多数其他国家丰富(例如意大利就有 200 个原生兰花物种),不过它们包括了欧洲发现的所有三个亚科的代表:兰花亚科(Cypripedioideae)(仅在英国)、兰科(Orchidoideae)和表皮兰科(Epidendroideae)。物种的确切数量因所采用的分类系统而异,但贝特曼(2022 年)指出,英国和爱尔兰有 53 个本地物种。随着长期原生物种的灭绝或来自欧洲大陆的新物种的到来,这些物种的数量也在不断变化;例如,Spiranthes aestivalis (Poir.) Rich.例如,Spiranthes aestivalis (Poir.) Rich.(尽管物种数量相对较少,但英国和爱尔兰的兰花却得到了很好的研究,从这些研究中获得的数据提供了有关栖息地丧失和气候变化影响的有用信息。这一点非常重要,因为由于兰花的生命史非常复杂(包括它们的授粉综合征以及至少在其生命周期的一部分时间里依赖菌根真菌提供营养),包括 Dixon &amp; Swarts(2009 年)在内的作者都认为兰花特别容易受到环境变化的影响。最近,费伊(2022 年,第 9 页)写道:"兰花是一类迷人的植物,但它们也可以被视为相当于'煤矿中的金丝雀'的植物--由于它们与真菌和传粉者之间复杂的相互作用,许多兰花可能是生态系统健康状况下降的首批牺牲品。作者使用了英国早蜘蛛兰(Ophrys sphegodes Mill.(该研究结果使作者得出结论:"持续变暖将增加这种罕见兰花完全繁殖失败的年份频率"。气候变化还可能严重影响兰花形成其赖以生存的菌根联盟的能力。与兰花形成菌根关系的真菌(大部分)能够作为自由生物生存,但如果气候变化导致环境不再适合相关兰花生长,或者适当的真菌不再与兰花共生,那么兰花种群就有可能崩溃,甚至灭绝。除了影响植物之外,气候变化还会导致真菌的地理分布发生变化,影响真菌的多样性和丰度,并影响它们与植物之间的相互作用,而我们对气候变化对与兰花共生的菌根真菌的影响知之甚少。在我们目前的一个项目("FORECAST--量化气候变化对地中海生物多样性热点地区兰花菌根共生的影响")中,我们正在一系列气候变化模型下研究气候变化对兰花及其菌根真菌的潜在影响,该项目的数据可用于指导兰花的辅助迁移或适当的异地保护活动。2015 年,费伊(Fay,2015 年)在《柯蒂斯植物杂志》(第 32 卷,第 1 部分,含 8 个物种介绍)的一期主题中总结了有关英国和爱尔兰兰花物种现状的信息,确定了应对气候变化和其他威胁的(潜在)"赢家 "和 "输家"。在此,我们将发表另外 10 个本地物种的介绍,其中包括兰亚科和表皮亚科的 6 个和 4 个代表物种;蝶形花科的唯一成员(Cypripedium calceolus L.、这 10 个物种中有 8 个物种的插图是根据艺术家莱因希尔德-雷斯特里克(Reinhild Raistrick)在林迪斯芳岛上生长的植物绘制的,这些画作是该岛所有原生兰花插图集的一部分。Spiranthes spiralis (L.) Chevall.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信