Impacts of Forest Management-Induced Productivity Changes on Future Land Use and Land Cover Change

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Earths Future Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1029/2024EF004878
Meng Luo, Adam Daigneault, Xin Zhao, Dalei Hao, Min Chen
{"title":"Impacts of Forest Management-Induced Productivity Changes on Future Land Use and Land Cover Change","authors":"Meng Luo,&nbsp;Adam Daigneault,&nbsp;Xin Zhao,&nbsp;Dalei Hao,&nbsp;Min Chen","doi":"10.1029/2024EF004878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anthropogenic land use and land cover change (LULCC) is projected to continue in the future. However, the influence of forest management on forest productivity change and subsequent LULCC projections remains under-investigated. This study explored the impacts of forest management-induced change in forest productivity on LULCC throughout the 21st century. Specifically, we developed a framework to softly couple the Global Change Analysis Model and Global Timber Model to consider forest management-induced forest productivity change and projected future LULCC across the five Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). We found future increases in forest management intensity overall drive the increase of forest productivity. The forest management-induced forest productivity change shows diverse responses across all SSPs, with a global increase from 2015 to 2100 ranging from 3.9% (SSP3) to 8.8% (SSP1). This further leads to an overall decrease in the total area with a change of land use types, with the largest decrease under SSP1 (−7.5%) and the smallest decrease under SSP3 (−0.7%) in 2100. Among land use types, considering forest management-induced change significantly reduces the expansion of managed forest and also reduces the loss of natural land in 2100 across SSPs. This suggests that ignoring forest management-induced forest productivity change underestimates the efficiency of wood production, overestimates the managed forest expansion required to meet the future demand, and consequently, potentially introduces uncertainties into relevant analyses, for example, carbon cycle and biodiversity. Thus, we advocate to better account for the impacts of forest management in future LULCC projections.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"12 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF004878","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF004878","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthropogenic land use and land cover change (LULCC) is projected to continue in the future. However, the influence of forest management on forest productivity change and subsequent LULCC projections remains under-investigated. This study explored the impacts of forest management-induced change in forest productivity on LULCC throughout the 21st century. Specifically, we developed a framework to softly couple the Global Change Analysis Model and Global Timber Model to consider forest management-induced forest productivity change and projected future LULCC across the five Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). We found future increases in forest management intensity overall drive the increase of forest productivity. The forest management-induced forest productivity change shows diverse responses across all SSPs, with a global increase from 2015 to 2100 ranging from 3.9% (SSP3) to 8.8% (SSP1). This further leads to an overall decrease in the total area with a change of land use types, with the largest decrease under SSP1 (−7.5%) and the smallest decrease under SSP3 (−0.7%) in 2100. Among land use types, considering forest management-induced change significantly reduces the expansion of managed forest and also reduces the loss of natural land in 2100 across SSPs. This suggests that ignoring forest management-induced forest productivity change underestimates the efficiency of wood production, overestimates the managed forest expansion required to meet the future demand, and consequently, potentially introduces uncertainties into relevant analyses, for example, carbon cycle and biodiversity. Thus, we advocate to better account for the impacts of forest management in future LULCC projections.

Abstract Image

森林管理引起的生产力变化对未来土地利用和土地覆盖变化的影响
预计未来人为土地利用和土地覆被变化(LULCC)仍将持续。然而,森林管理对森林生产力变化以及随后的土地利用、土地覆被和碳储量变化预测的影响仍未得到充分研究。本研究探讨了森林管理引起的森林生产力变化对整个 21 世纪 LULCC 的影响。具体来说,我们开发了一个框架,将全球变化分析模型和全球木材模型柔和地结合起来,以考虑森林管理引起的森林生产力变化,并预测五种共享社会经济路径 (SSP) 中未来的 LULCC。我们发现,未来森林管理强度的增加总体上推动了森林生产力的提高。森林管理引起的森林生产力变化在所有 SSP 中都表现出不同的反应,从 2015 年到 2100 年的全球增幅从 3.9% (SSP3)到 8.8% (SSP1)不等。这进一步导致 2100 年土地利用类型发生变化的总面积总体减少,其中 SSP1 的减少幅度最大(-7.5%),SSP3 的减少幅度最小(-0.7%)。在土地利用类型中,考虑森林管理引起的变化可显著减少管理林的扩张,同时也可减少 2100 年各 SSP 天然土地的损失。这表明,忽略森林管理引起的森林生产力变化会低估木材生产的效率,高估为满足未来需求所需的人工林扩张,从而可能给碳循环和生物多样性等相关分析带来不确定性。因此,我们主张在未来的土地利用、土地利用的变化和碳的变化预测中更好地考虑森林管理的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信