Urea fertilization for potentializing beef cattle performance in agroforestry systems in the humid tropics

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Thaís Lima Figueiredo, Valéria Xavier de Oliveira Apolinário, Janerson José Coelho, Luciano Cavalcante Muniz, Maria Karoline de Carvalho Rodrigues de Sousa, Raabe Alves Souza, Giselle Cristina da Silva Carneiro, Natannael Castro Vilhena, Joaquim Bezerra Costa, Jose Carlos Batista Dubeux Jr
{"title":"Urea fertilization for potentializing beef cattle performance in agroforestry systems in the humid tropics","authors":"Thaís Lima Figueiredo,&nbsp;Valéria Xavier de Oliveira Apolinário,&nbsp;Janerson José Coelho,&nbsp;Luciano Cavalcante Muniz,&nbsp;Maria Karoline de Carvalho Rodrigues de Sousa,&nbsp;Raabe Alves Souza,&nbsp;Giselle Cristina da Silva Carneiro,&nbsp;Natannael Castro Vilhena,&nbsp;Joaquim Bezerra Costa,&nbsp;Jose Carlos Batista Dubeux Jr","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study hypothesized that urea fertilization could optimize animal performance in an agroforestry system. This study evaluated how increasing rates of N fertilization (0, 100, 200, and 400 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) using urea (CH<sub>4</sub>N<sub>2</sub>O) affected forage mass, nutritive value, and beef cattle (<i>Bos indicus</i>) performance in an agroforestry system with Massai grass (<i>Megathyrsus maximus</i> Jacq. cv. Massai) and legume tree (<i>Mimosa caesalpiniifolia</i> Benth.), in the humid tropic region of Brazil, over 2-year period. The experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design with four treatments (N fertilizer rates) and three replications. Forage mass was positive and linearly affected by N fertilization (<i>p</i> = .0236, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.92), ranging from 1297 to 1583 kg DM ha<sup>−1</sup> under 0 and 400 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. There was greater average forage mass during the rainy period (1826 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). Crude protein in green forage mass increased linearly (<i>p</i> = .0041, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.91) in function of the N applied. Cattle average daily gain showed a positive quadratic response to the rates of N applied (<i>p</i> = .0298, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.97), ranging from 0.46 kg to 0.68 kg animal day<sup>−1</sup>; and the gain per area increased linearly from 1.84 to 2.68 kg LW ha<sup>−1</sup> day<sup>−1</sup> (<i>p</i> = .0640, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.96). The findings indicate that applying 200 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, split-applied during the rainy season, would yield acceptable outcomes in terms of forage mass, nutritive value, and animal performance for this type of agroforestry system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12683","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study hypothesized that urea fertilization could optimize animal performance in an agroforestry system. This study evaluated how increasing rates of N fertilization (0, 100, 200, and 400 kg N ha−1 year−1) using urea (CH4N2O) affected forage mass, nutritive value, and beef cattle (Bos indicus) performance in an agroforestry system with Massai grass (Megathyrsus maximus Jacq. cv. Massai) and legume tree (Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth.), in the humid tropic region of Brazil, over 2-year period. The experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design with four treatments (N fertilizer rates) and three replications. Forage mass was positive and linearly affected by N fertilization (p = .0236, R2 = 0.92), ranging from 1297 to 1583 kg DM ha−1 under 0 and 400 kg N ha−1 year−1, respectively. There was greater average forage mass during the rainy period (1826 kg ha−1) (p < .05). Crude protein in green forage mass increased linearly (p = .0041, R2 = 0.91) in function of the N applied. Cattle average daily gain showed a positive quadratic response to the rates of N applied (p = .0298, R2 = 0.97), ranging from 0.46 kg to 0.68 kg animal day−1; and the gain per area increased linearly from 1.84 to 2.68 kg LW ha−1 day−1 (p = .0640, R2 = 0.96). The findings indicate that applying 200 kg N ha−1 year−1, split-applied during the rainy season, would yield acceptable outcomes in terms of forage mass, nutritive value, and animal performance for this type of agroforestry system.

在湿热带农林系统中施用尿素肥料以提高肉牛的性能潜力
本研究假设尿素施肥可以优化农林系统中的动物生产性能。本研究评估了在巴西潮湿热带地区,使用尿素(CH4N2O)增加氮肥施用量(0、100、200 和 400 kg N ha-1 year-1)如何影响马赛草(Megathyrs maximus Jacq.实验采用随机完全区组设计,有四个处理(氮肥施用量)和三次重复。牧草质量受氮肥影响呈线性正相关(p = .0236,R2 = 0.92),在 0 和 400 千克/公顷/年氮肥条件下,牧草质量分别为 1297 至 1583 千克/公顷/年。雨季的平均牧草质量更大(1826 千克/公顷-1)(p < .05)。青饲料中的粗蛋白含量与氮的施用量呈线性增长(p = .0041,R2 = 0.91)。牛的平均日增重与氮的施用量呈正二次函数关系(p = .0298,R2 = 0.97),从 0.46 公斤到 0.68 公斤/日;单位面积增重从 1.84 到 2.68 公斤/公顷/日呈线性增长(p = .0640,R2 = 0.96)。研究结果表明,每年每公顷施用 200 千克氮,在雨季分次施用,可为这种农林系统带来可接受的饲草质量、营养价值和动物生产性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信