Regional differences in the effects of watershed glacial coverage on the performance of Pacific Blue mussel, Mytilus trossulus

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Gracelyn Ham , Scott Gabara , Preslee Chase , Brenda Konar , Schery Umanzor
{"title":"Regional differences in the effects of watershed glacial coverage on the performance of Pacific Blue mussel, Mytilus trossulus","authors":"Gracelyn Ham ,&nbsp;Scott Gabara ,&nbsp;Preslee Chase ,&nbsp;Brenda Konar ,&nbsp;Schery Umanzor","doi":"10.1016/j.jembe.2024.152043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Climate change is causing atmospheric warming, leading to increasing global temperatures. Warming is especially evident in high latitude regions, leading to losses in glacial mass and consequences downstream. Pacific Blue mussels are a vital species in such downstream coastal environments where they provide services such as stabilizing substrate, facilitating energy transfer, and supporting the mariculture industry and subsistence communities. As glaciers continue to melt, it is unknown how and to what extent the projected glacial runoff will affect intertidal mussel performance. To determine the effects of glacial melt on mussel performance, mussel morphometrics (weight, length, width), mussel adhesion force, shell breaking force, and growth rates were recorded over five months at nine sites whose watersheds span a gradient of glacial coverage (0–60%) in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). Five sites were used in Kachemak Bay (Southcentral Alaska) and four sites in Lynn Canal (Southeast Alaska). Overall, adhesion force and shell breaking force decreased with increasing glacial coverage of watersheds. However, oceanic proximity and input appear to buffer against the effects of glacial melt as mussels in the more oceanic Kachemak Bay region had higher adhesion and shell breaking forces relative to the mussels in the less oceanic Lynn Canal region. Within the more oceanic Kachemak Bay region, mussel growth rates decreased with increasing glacial coverage of watersheds. In contrast, mussel growth rates generally increased at sites with increasing glaciation of watersheds in the less oceanic Lynn Canal region. Overall, our results suggest that glacial melt is altering conditions in the nearshore marine environment and reducing mussel performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology","volume":"580 ","pages":"Article 152043"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022098124000583/pdfft?md5=043f23d7a9d6e4570477cab32da794ce&pid=1-s2.0-S0022098124000583-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022098124000583","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change is causing atmospheric warming, leading to increasing global temperatures. Warming is especially evident in high latitude regions, leading to losses in glacial mass and consequences downstream. Pacific Blue mussels are a vital species in such downstream coastal environments where they provide services such as stabilizing substrate, facilitating energy transfer, and supporting the mariculture industry and subsistence communities. As glaciers continue to melt, it is unknown how and to what extent the projected glacial runoff will affect intertidal mussel performance. To determine the effects of glacial melt on mussel performance, mussel morphometrics (weight, length, width), mussel adhesion force, shell breaking force, and growth rates were recorded over five months at nine sites whose watersheds span a gradient of glacial coverage (0–60%) in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). Five sites were used in Kachemak Bay (Southcentral Alaska) and four sites in Lynn Canal (Southeast Alaska). Overall, adhesion force and shell breaking force decreased with increasing glacial coverage of watersheds. However, oceanic proximity and input appear to buffer against the effects of glacial melt as mussels in the more oceanic Kachemak Bay region had higher adhesion and shell breaking forces relative to the mussels in the less oceanic Lynn Canal region. Within the more oceanic Kachemak Bay region, mussel growth rates decreased with increasing glacial coverage of watersheds. In contrast, mussel growth rates generally increased at sites with increasing glaciation of watersheds in the less oceanic Lynn Canal region. Overall, our results suggest that glacial melt is altering conditions in the nearshore marine environment and reducing mussel performance.

流域冰川覆盖对太平洋蓝贻贝(Mytilus trossulus)表现影响的地区差异
气候变化造成大气变暖,导致全球气温上升。气候变暖在高纬度地区尤为明显,导致冰川量减少并对下游造成影响。太平洋蓝贻贝是这种下游沿海环境中的重要物种,它们提供稳定底质、促进能量传递、支持海水养殖业和生计社区等服务。随着冰川的不断融化,预计的冰川径流将如何以及在多大程度上影响潮间带贻贝的表现尚不得而知。为了确定冰川融化对贻贝性能的影响,在阿拉斯加湾(GOA)冰川覆盖率梯度(0-60%)的九个地点,对贻贝形态计量(重量、长度、宽度)、贻贝附着力、破壳力和生长率进行了为期五个月的记录。其中五个地点位于卡切马克湾(阿拉斯加中南部),四个地点位于林恩运河(阿拉斯加东南部)。总体而言,附着力和破壳力随着流域冰川覆盖率的增加而降低。然而,海洋的邻近性和输入似乎可以缓冲冰川融化的影响,因为相对于海洋较少的林恩运河地区的贻贝,海洋较多的卡切马克湾地区的贻贝具有更高的附着力和破壳力。在海洋性较强的卡西马克湾地区,贻贝的生长率随着流域冰川覆盖率的增加而降低。与此相反,在海洋性较弱的林恩运河地区,随着流域冰川覆盖率的增加,贻贝的生长率普遍上升。总之,我们的研究结果表明,冰川融化正在改变近岸海洋环境的条件,并降低贻贝的生长率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology provides a forum for experimental ecological research on marine organisms in relation to their environment. Topic areas include studies that focus on biochemistry, physiology, behavior, genetics, and ecological theory. The main emphasis of the Journal lies in hypothesis driven experimental work, both from the laboratory and the field. Natural experiments or descriptive studies that elucidate fundamental ecological processes are welcome. Submissions should have a broad ecological framework beyond the specific study organism or geographic region. Short communications that highlight emerging issues and exciting discoveries within five printed pages will receive a rapid turnaround. Papers describing important new analytical, computational, experimental and theoretical techniques and methods are encouraged and will be highlighted as Methodological Advances. We welcome proposals for Review Papers synthesizing a specific field within marine ecology. Finally, the journal aims to publish Special Issues at regular intervals synthesizing a particular field of marine science. All printed papers undergo a peer review process before being accepted and will receive a first decision within three months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信