Intrapartum and postpartum antibiotic use in seven low- and middle-income countries: Findings from the A-PLUS trial.

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Sarah Saleem, Haleema Yasmin, Janet L Moore, Anum Rahim, Iram Shakeel, Adrien Lokangaka, Antoinette Tshefu, Melissa Bauserman, Musaku Mwenechanya, Elwyn Chomba, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Avinash Kavi, Richard J Derman, Nancy F Krebs, Lester Figueroa, Manolo Mazariegos, Paul Nyongesa, Sherri Bucher, Fabian Esamai, Archana Patel, Manjushree Waikar, Poonam Shivkumar, Patricia L Hibberd, William A Petri, Sk Masum Billah, Rashidul Haque, Waldemar A Carlo, Alan Tita, Marion Koso-Thomas, Jennifer Hemingway-Foday, Elizabeth M McClure, Robert L Goldenberg
{"title":"Intrapartum and postpartum antibiotic use in seven low- and middle-income countries: Findings from the A-PLUS trial.","authors":"Sarah Saleem, Haleema Yasmin, Janet L Moore, Anum Rahim, Iram Shakeel, Adrien Lokangaka, Antoinette Tshefu, Melissa Bauserman, Musaku Mwenechanya, Elwyn Chomba, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Avinash Kavi, Richard J Derman, Nancy F Krebs, Lester Figueroa, Manolo Mazariegos, Paul Nyongesa, Sherri Bucher, Fabian Esamai, Archana Patel, Manjushree Waikar, Poonam Shivkumar, Patricia L Hibberd, William A Petri, Sk Masum Billah, Rashidul Haque, Waldemar A Carlo, Alan Tita, Marion Koso-Thomas, Jennifer Hemingway-Foday, Elizabeth M McClure, Robert L Goldenberg","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the intrapartum and postpartum use of non-study antibiotics in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) during the double-blinded NICHD Global Network Azithromycin in Labor (A-PLUS) trial.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The antibiotic use sub-study was a planned prospective, observational sub-study of the A-PLUS trial.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>The study was carried out in hospitals or health centres affiliated with eight sites of the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research (Global Network) in seven countries: Bangladesh, Pakistan, India (two sites), Kenya, Zambia, The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Guatemala.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Totally, 29 278 pregnant women enrolled in the A-PLUS trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data on 29 278 pregnant women admitted to a facility for delivery related to non-study antibiotic use overall and during three time periods: (1) in the facility prior to delivery, (2) after delivery until facility discharge and (3) after discharge to 42 days post-partum.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Non-study antibiotic use overall and for treatment or prophylaxis by the site during the three time periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 29 278 women in the study, 5020 (17.1%; 95% CI 16.7%-17.6%) received non-study antibiotics in the facility prior to delivery, 11 956 (40.8%; 95% CI 40.3%-41.4%) received non-study antibiotics in the facility after delivery, and 13 390 (47.6%; 95% CI 47.0%-48.2%) women received non-study antibiotics after delivery and after facility discharge. Antibiotics were prescribed more often among women in the Asian and Guatemalan sites than in the African sites. In the three time-periods, among those receiving antibiotics, prophylaxis was the indication in 82.3%, 97.7% and 90.7% of the cases, respectively. The type of antibiotics used varied substantially by time-period and site, but generally, penicillin-type drugs, cephalosporin-type drugs and metronidazole were used more frequently than other types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across the eight sites of the Global Network, in the facility before delivery, and in the post-partum periods before and after facility discharge, antibiotics were used frequently, but use was highly variable by site and time-period.</p>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17930","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the intrapartum and postpartum use of non-study antibiotics in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) during the double-blinded NICHD Global Network Azithromycin in Labor (A-PLUS) trial.

Design: The antibiotic use sub-study was a planned prospective, observational sub-study of the A-PLUS trial.

Settings: The study was carried out in hospitals or health centres affiliated with eight sites of the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research (Global Network) in seven countries: Bangladesh, Pakistan, India (two sites), Kenya, Zambia, The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Guatemala.

Population: Totally, 29 278 pregnant women enrolled in the A-PLUS trial.

Methods: We collected data on 29 278 pregnant women admitted to a facility for delivery related to non-study antibiotic use overall and during three time periods: (1) in the facility prior to delivery, (2) after delivery until facility discharge and (3) after discharge to 42 days post-partum.

Main outcome measures: Non-study antibiotic use overall and for treatment or prophylaxis by the site during the three time periods.

Results: Of the 29 278 women in the study, 5020 (17.1%; 95% CI 16.7%-17.6%) received non-study antibiotics in the facility prior to delivery, 11 956 (40.8%; 95% CI 40.3%-41.4%) received non-study antibiotics in the facility after delivery, and 13 390 (47.6%; 95% CI 47.0%-48.2%) women received non-study antibiotics after delivery and after facility discharge. Antibiotics were prescribed more often among women in the Asian and Guatemalan sites than in the African sites. In the three time-periods, among those receiving antibiotics, prophylaxis was the indication in 82.3%, 97.7% and 90.7% of the cases, respectively. The type of antibiotics used varied substantially by time-period and site, but generally, penicillin-type drugs, cephalosporin-type drugs and metronidazole were used more frequently than other types.

Conclusions: Across the eight sites of the Global Network, in the facility before delivery, and in the post-partum periods before and after facility discharge, antibiotics were used frequently, but use was highly variable by site and time-period.

七个中低收入国家的产前和产后抗生素使用情况:A-PLUS试验结果。
目的描述中低收入国家(LMICs)在国家儿童疾病防治中心(NICHD)全球网络产程中阿奇霉素双盲试验(A-PLUS)期间产前和产后使用非试验抗生素的情况:抗生素使用子研究是 A-PLUS 试验的一项计划性前瞻性观察子研究:研究在七个国家的八个全球妇幼健康研究网络(全球网络)下属医院或保健中心进行:孟加拉国、巴基斯坦、印度(两个地点)、肯尼亚、赞比亚、刚果民主共和国和危地马拉:方法:我们收集了 29 278 名参加 A-PLUS 试验的孕妇的数据:我们收集了 29 278 名在医疗机构分娩的孕妇的数据,这些数据涉及非研究抗生素使用的总体情况和三个时间段:(1) 分娩前在医疗机构,(2) 分娩后至出院,(3) 出院后至产后 42 天:主要结果测量指标:非研究抗生素的总体使用情况,以及三个时间段内各医疗机构治疗或预防抗生素的使用情况:在参与研究的 29 278 名产妇中,有 5020 人(17.1%;95% CI 16.7%-17.6%)在分娩前在医疗机构接受了非研究抗生素治疗,有 11 956 人(40.8%;95% CI 40.3%-41.4%)在分娩后在医疗机构接受了非研究抗生素治疗,有 13 390 人(47.6%;95% CI 47.0%-48.2%)在分娩后和出院后接受了非研究抗生素治疗。亚洲和危地马拉地区的产妇比非洲地区的产妇更常使用抗生素。在这三个时间段内,接受抗生素治疗的病例中,分别有 82.3%、97.7% 和 90.7% 的病例以预防为主。不同时期和不同地点使用的抗生素种类差别很大,但一般来说,青霉素类药物、头孢菌素类药物和甲硝唑的使用频率高于其他类型的抗生素:在全球网络的八个地点中,在分娩前、分娩后出院前和出院后,抗生素的使用频率很高,但不同地点和不同时间段的使用情况差异很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信