Curriculum reform and stereotype threat in medical education: Implications for student well-being.

Abstract

Purpose: Altering the curriculum of a program can have negative repercussions for the student experience, including peer mentorships and interclass relationships. This study investigated the effect of curriculum reform on students' emotional and social well-being in a predoctoral dental program. We explored if any of these consequences could be related to stereotype threat.

Methods: We utilized a quasi-experimental design with two different treatments, New Curriculum Treatment (New-CT, n = 44) and Past Curriculum Treatment (Past-CT, n = 43). Quantitative data were collected through surveys to assess students' perceptions of curriculum changes and their impacts on anxiety, confidence, and clinical performance. Qualitative data were gathered via semi-structured interviews to explore personal experiences of stereotype threat and its implications on peer relationships and mentorship dynamics.

Results: The findings suggest significant effects of curriculum changes on interpersonal relationships. Past-CT viewed New-CT as overconfident, while New-CT felt heightened performance pressure. Thematic and interview analyses revealed deep-rooted tensions, with New-CT feeling mistrusted and Past-CT resenting New-CT's perceived accelerated competence. Stereotype threat was identified as a key factor worsening these inter-group tensions and affecting clinical performance and relationships.

Conclusions: Curriculum changes in dental education can significantly affect students' well-being, with stereotype threat playing a critical role in these dynamics. When making changes to the structure, sequencing, or content of a program, administrators need to be aware of the potential ramifications these changes could have on students' relationships with their peers.