{"title":"Enhanced Post-Movement Beta Rebound: Unraveling the Impact of Preplanned Sequential Actions.","authors":"Lingli Zhang, Kaige Bao, Yu Liao","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2024.2384886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Post-Movement Beta Rebound (PMBR) is the increase in beta-band power after voluntary movement ends, but its specific role in cognitive processing is unclear. Current theory links PMBR with updates to internal models, mental frameworks that help anticipate and react to sensory feedback. However, research has not explored how reactivating a preexisting action plan, another source for internal model updates, might affect PMBR intensity. To address this gap, we recruited 20 participants (mean age 18.55 ± 0.51; 12 females) for an experiment involving isolated (single-step) or sequential (two-step) motor tasks based on predetermined cues. We compared PMBR after single-step movements with PMBR after the first movement in two-step tasks to assess the influence of a subsequent action on the PMBR power associated with the first action. The results show a significant increase in PMBR magnitude after the first movement in sequential tasks compared to the second action and the isolated movements. Notably, this increase is more pronounced for right-hand movements, suggesting lateralized brain activity in the left hemisphere. These findings indicate that PMBR is influenced not only by external stimuli but also by internal cognitive processes such as working memory. This insight enhances our understanding of PMBR's role in motor control, emphasizing the integration of both external and internal information.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2024.2384886","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Post-Movement Beta Rebound (PMBR) is the increase in beta-band power after voluntary movement ends, but its specific role in cognitive processing is unclear. Current theory links PMBR with updates to internal models, mental frameworks that help anticipate and react to sensory feedback. However, research has not explored how reactivating a preexisting action plan, another source for internal model updates, might affect PMBR intensity. To address this gap, we recruited 20 participants (mean age 18.55 ± 0.51; 12 females) for an experiment involving isolated (single-step) or sequential (two-step) motor tasks based on predetermined cues. We compared PMBR after single-step movements with PMBR after the first movement in two-step tasks to assess the influence of a subsequent action on the PMBR power associated with the first action. The results show a significant increase in PMBR magnitude after the first movement in sequential tasks compared to the second action and the isolated movements. Notably, this increase is more pronounced for right-hand movements, suggesting lateralized brain activity in the left hemisphere. These findings indicate that PMBR is influenced not only by external stimuli but also by internal cognitive processes such as working memory. This insight enhances our understanding of PMBR's role in motor control, emphasizing the integration of both external and internal information.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.