The impact of the English calorie labelling policy on the energy content of food offered and purchased in worksite cafeterias: a natural experiment.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Madison Luick, Lauren Bandy, Susan A Jebb, Rachel Pechey
{"title":"The impact of the English calorie labelling policy on the energy content of food offered and purchased in worksite cafeterias: a natural experiment.","authors":"Madison Luick, Lauren Bandy, Susan A Jebb, Rachel Pechey","doi":"10.1186/s40795-024-00914-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>On 6 April 2022, legislation came into effect in England requiring calorie labels to be applied to food items on menus of larger food businesses. This study aimed to assess the impact of calorie labelling on (a) food purchased and (b) energy content of menu options in worksite cafeterias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Product-level sales data and energy content of available items was obtained from 142 worksite cafeterias from January 2022-October 2022. Interrupted-time-series (ITS) analysis with level and slope change evaluated daily energy (kcal) purchased per item, and ITS with level change assessed mean energy per option available on menus before and after calorie labelling. Each analysis was conducted 6 weeks and 6 months from implementation. A post-hoc ITS examined weekly energy purchased per item over a longer period (March 2021-October 2022; 135 sites).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no evidence calorie labelling changed the energy content of foods purchased (6-week: + 0.60 cal/product, 95%CI:-2.54, + 3.75; 6-month: + 1.59 cal/product, 95%CI:-0.96, + 4.16). Post-hoc analyses suggested calorie labels were associated with a reduction in mean energy of items purchased over time (-0.65 kcal/week, 95%CI:-0.81,-0.49), but a significant increase (+ 3 kcal, 95%CI: + 0.43, + 5.60) at the point of implementation. There was a reduction in the mean energy content of menu options at each seasonal menu change (April 2022:-1.79 kcal, 95%CI:-3.42,-0.15; July 2022:-4.18 kcal, 95% CI:-7.65,-0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This large observational study in worksite cafeterias found no evidence to indicate the introduction of calorie labelling led to any immediate reduction in energy purchased by customers. There was some evidence of increasing impact over time, possibly associated with changes in menu offerings, but this effect was small and cannot be directly attributed to calorie labelling.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"10 1","pages":"110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00914-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: On 6 April 2022, legislation came into effect in England requiring calorie labels to be applied to food items on menus of larger food businesses. This study aimed to assess the impact of calorie labelling on (a) food purchased and (b) energy content of menu options in worksite cafeterias.

Methods: Product-level sales data and energy content of available items was obtained from 142 worksite cafeterias from January 2022-October 2022. Interrupted-time-series (ITS) analysis with level and slope change evaluated daily energy (kcal) purchased per item, and ITS with level change assessed mean energy per option available on menus before and after calorie labelling. Each analysis was conducted 6 weeks and 6 months from implementation. A post-hoc ITS examined weekly energy purchased per item over a longer period (March 2021-October 2022; 135 sites).

Results: There was no evidence calorie labelling changed the energy content of foods purchased (6-week: + 0.60 cal/product, 95%CI:-2.54, + 3.75; 6-month: + 1.59 cal/product, 95%CI:-0.96, + 4.16). Post-hoc analyses suggested calorie labels were associated with a reduction in mean energy of items purchased over time (-0.65 kcal/week, 95%CI:-0.81,-0.49), but a significant increase (+ 3 kcal, 95%CI: + 0.43, + 5.60) at the point of implementation. There was a reduction in the mean energy content of menu options at each seasonal menu change (April 2022:-1.79 kcal, 95%CI:-3.42,-0.15; July 2022:-4.18 kcal, 95% CI:-7.65,-0.73).

Conclusion: This large observational study in worksite cafeterias found no evidence to indicate the introduction of calorie labelling led to any immediate reduction in energy purchased by customers. There was some evidence of increasing impact over time, possibly associated with changes in menu offerings, but this effect was small and cannot be directly attributed to calorie labelling.

英国卡路里标签政策对工作场所自助餐厅提供和购买的食物能量含量的影响:自然实验。
背景:2022 年 4 月 6 日,英格兰立法生效,要求大型食品企业菜单上的食品必须标注卡路里。本研究旨在评估卡路里标签对(a)工作场所自助餐厅所购食品和(b)菜单选项的能量含量的影响:方法:从 2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月期间的 142 家工地食堂获取了产品层面的销售数据和可选项目的能量含量。采用水平和斜率变化的间断时间序列(ITS)分析评估了每种食品的日购买能量(千卡),采用水平变化的间断时间序列(ITS)分析评估了热量标识前后菜单上每种食品的平均能量。每项分析分别在实施 6 周和 6 个月后进行。一项事后 ITS 检查了更长时期内(2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 10 月;135 个地点)每周每项购买的能量:结果:没有证据表明卡路里标签改变了购买食品的能量含量(6 周:+ 0.60 卡路里/产品):+0.60卡路里/产品,95%CI:-2.54,+3.75;6个月:+1.59卡路里/产品,95%CI:-0.96,+4.16)。事后分析表明,随着时间的推移,卡路里标签与所购食品的平均能量减少有关(-0.65 千卡/周,95%CI:-0.81,-0.49),但在实施时则显著增加(+ 3 千卡,95%CI:+ 0.43,+ 5.60)。每次季节性菜单变化时,菜单选项的平均能量含量都会降低(2022 年 4 月:-1.79 千卡,95%CI:-3.42,-0.15;2022 年 7 月:-4.18 千卡,95%CI:-7.65,-0.73):这项针对工作场所自助餐厅的大型观察研究没有发现任何证据表明,引入卡路里标签会立即减少顾客购买的能量。有证据表明,随着时间的推移,影响会越来越大,这可能与菜单产品的变化有关,但这种影响很小,不能直接归因于卡路里标签。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信