The association between long working hours, shift work, and suicidal ideation: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
ACS Applied Energy Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.5271/sjweh.4182
Joungsue Kim, Ria Kwon, Hyunok Yun, Ga-Young Lim, Kyung-Sook Woo, Inah Kim
{"title":"The association between long working hours, shift work, and suicidal ideation: A systematic review and meta-analyses.","authors":"Joungsue Kim, Ria Kwon, Hyunok Yun, Ga-Young Lim, Kyung-Sook Woo, Inah Kim","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The association between occupational psychosocial factors and mental health has been studied in several systematic reviews. However, few systematic reviews exist that specifically address suicidal ideation. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the associations between long working hours, shift work, and suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically screened and collected studies published between January 1970 and September 2022 from three electronic databases and Google Scholar. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model and assessed the risk of bias using a navigation guide. Additionally, the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to consider five items, including the risk of bias and publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight articles were included in this meta-analysis. After adjusting for covariates, the overall odds ratio (OR) for long working hours and shift work were 1.44 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.63] and 1.34 (95% CI 1.22-1.47), respectively. Compared with those who worked <40 hours per week, those who worked >55 hours per week had a 1.65 (95% CI 1.37-1.98) higher risk of suicidal ideation, and fixed night shift workers had 1.37 (95% CI 1.03-1.83) higher risk than non-shift workers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence has shown associations between long working hours, shift work, and suicidal ideation. Implementing evidence-based interventions to address these risk factors may help prevent the progression of suicidal ideation. However, further studies are critically needed, especially those using standardized exposure definitions and longitudinal data.</p>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The association between occupational psychosocial factors and mental health has been studied in several systematic reviews. However, few systematic reviews exist that specifically address suicidal ideation. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the associations between long working hours, shift work, and suicidal ideation.

Methods: We systematically screened and collected studies published between January 1970 and September 2022 from three electronic databases and Google Scholar. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model and assessed the risk of bias using a navigation guide. Additionally, the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to consider five items, including the risk of bias and publication bias.

Results: Twenty-eight articles were included in this meta-analysis. After adjusting for covariates, the overall odds ratio (OR) for long working hours and shift work were 1.44 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.63] and 1.34 (95% CI 1.22-1.47), respectively. Compared with those who worked <40 hours per week, those who worked >55 hours per week had a 1.65 (95% CI 1.37-1.98) higher risk of suicidal ideation, and fixed night shift workers had 1.37 (95% CI 1.03-1.83) higher risk than non-shift workers.

Conclusions: Evidence has shown associations between long working hours, shift work, and suicidal ideation. Implementing evidence-based interventions to address these risk factors may help prevent the progression of suicidal ideation. However, further studies are critically needed, especially those using standardized exposure definitions and longitudinal data.

长时间工作、轮班工作与自杀倾向之间的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
研究目的多篇系统性综述对职业心理社会因素与心理健康之间的关系进行了研究。然而,很少有系统综述专门针对自杀意念。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究长时间工作、轮班工作与自杀意念之间的关联:我们从三个电子数据库和谷歌学术中系统地筛选并收集了 1970 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月间发表的研究。我们使用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析,并使用导航指南评估了偏倚风险。此外,我们还采用了建议评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)来考虑五个项目,包括偏倚风险和发表偏倚:本次荟萃分析共纳入了 28 篇文章。在对协变量进行调整后,长时间工作和轮班工作的总体几率比(OR)分别为 1.44 [95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.26-1.63] 和 1.34 (95% CI 1.22-1.47)。与每周工作55小时的人相比,有自杀倾向的风险高出1.65(95% CI 1.37-1.98),固定夜班工人比非轮班工人的风险高出1.37(95% CI 1.03-1.83):有证据表明,长时间工作、轮班工作与自杀倾向之间存在关联。针对这些风险因素实施循证干预措施可能有助于预防自杀倾向的发展。然而,我们亟需开展进一步的研究,尤其是那些使用标准化暴露定义和纵向数据的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信