Plateletcrit and absolute immature platelet count are not impacted by platelet transfusions: a single-centre prospective study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Usman Ali
{"title":"Plateletcrit and absolute immature platelet count are not impacted by platelet transfusions: a single-centre prospective study.","authors":"Usman Ali","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2024.2392127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This is the first study in which the impact of platelet transfusions on seven platelet indices was evaluated in platelet transfusion-dependent patients admitted in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Among a cohort of 21 ICU patients prospectively studied over eleven months, a total of 19 ICU patients were enrolled. Seven platelet indices were measured before and then, within 18-24 h, after platelet transfusions using the Sysmex XN-10 analyser and statistically investigated as follows: i) apheresis vs. pooled platelet transfusions; ii) pre- vs. post-platelet transfusions; and iii) platelet count (PC) increment vs. PC decrement group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 79.2% of platelet transfusion episodes in ICU patients showed an increase in PC increment within 18-24 h, of which 73.7% had a peak percentage immature platelet fraction (%-IPF) above 10.0% during their stay. No difference was observed in the measurements of platelet indices between the apheresis and pooled platelet transfusion doses (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). Of the seven platelet indices investigated, plateletcrit (PCT) and absolute immature platelet count (A-IPF) were not influenced by platelet transfusions and thus proven to be stable (0.06 vs. 0.07%, <i>p</i> = 0.0901 and 4.6 vs. 4.9 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, <i>p</i> = 0.4559, respectively), despite their close proximity to platelet transfusion. But the overall effectiveness of these indices in detecting changes over time was not hindered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A-IPF and PCT are stable after platelet transfusions, regardless of whether patient's respond to or do not respond to platelet transfusion doses. PCT and A-IPF may thus prove useful in monitoring patient transfusion support and guiding management in thrombocytopenic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"317-325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2024.2392127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This is the first study in which the impact of platelet transfusions on seven platelet indices was evaluated in platelet transfusion-dependent patients admitted in the ICU.

Study design and methods: Among a cohort of 21 ICU patients prospectively studied over eleven months, a total of 19 ICU patients were enrolled. Seven platelet indices were measured before and then, within 18-24 h, after platelet transfusions using the Sysmex XN-10 analyser and statistically investigated as follows: i) apheresis vs. pooled platelet transfusions; ii) pre- vs. post-platelet transfusions; and iii) platelet count (PC) increment vs. PC decrement group.

Results: A 79.2% of platelet transfusion episodes in ICU patients showed an increase in PC increment within 18-24 h, of which 73.7% had a peak percentage immature platelet fraction (%-IPF) above 10.0% during their stay. No difference was observed in the measurements of platelet indices between the apheresis and pooled platelet transfusion doses (all p > 0.05). Of the seven platelet indices investigated, plateletcrit (PCT) and absolute immature platelet count (A-IPF) were not influenced by platelet transfusions and thus proven to be stable (0.06 vs. 0.07%, p = 0.0901 and 4.6 vs. 4.9 × 109/L, p = 0.4559, respectively), despite their close proximity to platelet transfusion. But the overall effectiveness of these indices in detecting changes over time was not hindered.

Conclusion: A-IPF and PCT are stable after platelet transfusions, regardless of whether patient's respond to or do not respond to platelet transfusion doses. PCT and A-IPF may thus prove useful in monitoring patient transfusion support and guiding management in thrombocytopenic patients.

血小板crit和绝对未成熟血小板计数不受血小板输注的影响:一项单中心前瞻性研究。
研究背景这是第一项评估血小板输注对重症监护病房血小板输注依赖患者七项血小板指标影响的研究:研究设计:在对 21 名重症监护室患者进行的为期 11 个月的前瞻性研究中,共纳入了 19 名重症监护室患者。使用 Sysmex XN-10 分析仪测量了输注血小板前和输注血小板后 18-24 小时内的七项血小板指数,并对以下几项指数进行了统计调查:i) 无细胞输注与集中输注血小板;ii) 输注血小板前与输注血小板后;iii) 血小板计数(PC)增加组与 PC 减少组:79.2%的 ICU 患者在输注血小板后的 18-24 小时内 PC 增量有所增加,其中 73.7% 的患者在住院期间血小板未成熟百分比(%-IPF)的峰值超过 10.0%。血小板指数的测量结果显示,无细胞疗法和集中血小板输注疗法的血小板指数没有差异(均 p > 0.05)。在所调查的七项血小板指数中,plateletcrit(PCT)和绝对未成熟血小板计数(A-IPF)不受血小板输注的影响,因此被证明是稳定的(分别为 0.06 vs. 0.07%,p = 0.0901 和 4.6 vs. 4.9 × 109/L,p = 0.4559),尽管它们与血小板输注非常接近。结论:A-IPF 和 PCT 是检测血压变化的有效指标:结论:无论患者对血小板输注剂量有无反应,A-IPF 和 PCT 在血小板输注后都是稳定的。因此,PCT 和 A-IPF 可用于监测患者的输血支持情况,并指导血小板减少患者的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信