AI-KODA score application for cleanliness assessment in video capsule endoscopy frames.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Palak Handa, Nidhi Goel, Sreedevi Indu, Deepak Gunjan
{"title":"AI-KODA score application for cleanliness assessment in video capsule endoscopy frames.","authors":"Palak Handa, Nidhi Goel, Sreedevi Indu, Deepak Gunjan","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2390879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, there is no automated method for assessing cleanliness in video capsule endoscopy (VCE). Our objectives were to automate the process of evaluating and collecting medical scores of VCE frames according to the existing KOrea-CanaDA (KODA) scoring system by developing an easy-to-use mobile application called artificial intelligence-KODA (AI-KODA) score, as well as to determine the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the KODA score among three readers for prospective AI applications, and check the efficacy of the application.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>From the 28 patient capsule videos considered, 1539 sequential frames were selected at five-minute intervals, and 634 random frames were selected at random intervals during small bowel transit. The frames were processed and shifted to AI-KODA. Three readers (gastroenterology fellows), who had been trained in reading VCE, rated 2173 frames in duplicate four weeks apart after completing the training module on AI-KODA. The scores were saved automatically in real time. Reliability was assessed for each video using estimate of intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). Then, the AI dataset was developed using the frames and their respective scores, and it was subjected to automatic classification of the scores <i>via</i> the random forest and the k-nearest neighbors classifiers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For sequential frames, ICCs for inter-rater variability were 'excellent' to 'good' among the three readers, while ICCs for intra-rater variability were 'good' to 'moderate'. For random frames, ICCs for inter-rater and intra-rater variability were 'excellent' among the three readers. The overall accuracy achieved was up to 61% for the random forest classifier and 62.38% for the k-nearest neighbors classifier.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI-KODA automates the process of scoring VCE frames based on the existing KODA score. It saves time in cleanliness assessment and is user-friendly for research and clinical use. Comprehensive benchmarking of the AI dataset is in process.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"311-320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2024.2390879","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, there is no automated method for assessing cleanliness in video capsule endoscopy (VCE). Our objectives were to automate the process of evaluating and collecting medical scores of VCE frames according to the existing KOrea-CanaDA (KODA) scoring system by developing an easy-to-use mobile application called artificial intelligence-KODA (AI-KODA) score, as well as to determine the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the KODA score among three readers for prospective AI applications, and check the efficacy of the application.

Method: From the 28 patient capsule videos considered, 1539 sequential frames were selected at five-minute intervals, and 634 random frames were selected at random intervals during small bowel transit. The frames were processed and shifted to AI-KODA. Three readers (gastroenterology fellows), who had been trained in reading VCE, rated 2173 frames in duplicate four weeks apart after completing the training module on AI-KODA. The scores were saved automatically in real time. Reliability was assessed for each video using estimate of intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). Then, the AI dataset was developed using the frames and their respective scores, and it was subjected to automatic classification of the scores via the random forest and the k-nearest neighbors classifiers.

Results: For sequential frames, ICCs for inter-rater variability were 'excellent' to 'good' among the three readers, while ICCs for intra-rater variability were 'good' to 'moderate'. For random frames, ICCs for inter-rater and intra-rater variability were 'excellent' among the three readers. The overall accuracy achieved was up to 61% for the random forest classifier and 62.38% for the k-nearest neighbors classifier.

Conclusions: AI-KODA automates the process of scoring VCE frames based on the existing KODA score. It saves time in cleanliness assessment and is user-friendly for research and clinical use. Comprehensive benchmarking of the AI dataset is in process.

AI-KODA 评分应用于视频胶囊内窥镜检查框架的清洁度评估。
背景:目前,还没有自动评估视频胶囊内窥镜(VCE)清洁度的方法。我们的目标是根据现有的KOrea-CanaDA(KODA)评分系统,通过开发一种名为人工智能-KODA(AI-KODA)评分的简单易用的移动应用程序,将评估和收集VCE帧医疗评分的过程自动化,同时确定KODA评分在三位阅读者之间的评分者间和评分者内部的可靠性,以用于未来的人工智能应用,并检查应用程序的有效性:方法:从 28 个患者胶囊视频中,以 5 分钟为间隔选取 1539 个连续帧,并在小肠转运过程中以随机间隔选取 634 个随机帧。这些帧经过处理后转入 AI-KODA。在完成 AI-KODA 的培训模块后,三名接受过 VCE 阅读培训的读者(胃肠病学研究员)对 2173 个帧进行了一式两份的评分,时间间隔为四周。评分结果实时自动保存。使用类内相关系数 (ICC) 估计值评估了每段视频的可靠性。然后,使用这些帧和它们各自的分数开发了人工智能数据集,并通过随机森林和 k-nearest neighbors 分类器对分数进行自动分类:对于顺序框架,三位阅读者的评分者间变异性 ICC 为 "优 "到 "良",评分者内部变异性 ICC 为 "良 "到 "中"。在随机帧中,三位阅卷人的评分者之间和评分者内部变异性的 ICC 均为 "优秀"。随机森林分类器的总体准确率高达 61%,k-近邻分类器的准确率为 62.38%:AI-KODA基于现有的KODA评分,实现了VCE帧评分过程的自动化。结论:AI-KODA 基于现有的 KODA 分数,实现了 VCE 帧评分过程的自动化,节省了清洁度评估的时间,对研究和临床使用非常友好。人工智能数据集的全面基准测试正在进行中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies (MITAT) is an international forum for endoscopic surgeons, interventional radiologists and industrial instrument manufacturers. It is the official journal of the Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT) whose membership includes representatives from a broad spectrum of medical specialities, instrument manufacturing and research. The journal brings the latest developments and innovations in minimally invasive therapy to its readers. What makes Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies unique is that we publish one or two special issues each year, which are devoted to a specific theme. Key topics covered by the journal include: interventional radiology, endoscopic surgery, imaging technology, manipulators and robotics for surgery and education and training for MIS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信