Baseline Symptoms and Neurocognitive Performance across Collision, Contact, and Noncontact Female High School Athletes.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Jessie R Oldham, David R Howell, Corey J Lanois, Paul D Berkner, Grant L Iverson, Rebekah C Mannix, William P Meehan
{"title":"Baseline Symptoms and Neurocognitive Performance across Collision, Contact, and Noncontact Female High School Athletes.","authors":"Jessie R Oldham, David R Howell, Corey J Lanois, Paul D Berkner, Grant L Iverson, Rebekah C Mannix, William P Meehan","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our purpose was to represent a rare cohort of female collision sport athletes and investigate the association between sport type (collision, contact, and noncontact), symptoms, and performance on baseline neurocognitive assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study using baseline computerized neurocognitive scores (Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing [ImPACT]) of 75,128 female high school student-athletes (age, 15.27 ± 1.05 yr) playing multiple sports. The dependent variables were verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor speed, reaction time, and total symptom score. The independent variable was sport type, categorized as collision, contact, noncontact, adjusted for the effect of the following covariables: age, concussion history, and comorbidities (learning disability, ADHD, psychiatric condition, headaches, migraines, speech therapy, special education, and repeating one of more years of school) using multivariable regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Female collision sport athletes reported significantly higher symptoms (9.81 ± 12.63) at baseline compared with contact (5.78 ± 9.25) or noncontact (6.39 ± 9.74) sport athletes ( P < 0.001). Using noncontact sports as a reference, there was no significant association between collision sport participation and cognitive composite scores (verbal memory: β = -0.57, 95% confidence interval = -1.80 to 0.66, P = 0.38; visual memory: β = -0.83, 95% confidence interval = -2.46 to 0.79, P = 0.31; visual motor speed: β = -0.21, 95% confidence interval = -1.01, 0.59, P = 0.61; reaction time: β = 0.01, 95% confidence interval = -0.01 to 0.02, P = 0.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participation in collision sports appears to be associated with baseline symptoms but not neurocognitive functioning among female adolescent athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"54-59"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to represent a rare cohort of female collision sport athletes and investigate the association between sport type (collision, contact, and noncontact), symptoms, and performance on baseline neurocognitive assessments.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using baseline computerized neurocognitive scores (Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing [ImPACT]) of 75,128 female high school student-athletes (age, 15.27 ± 1.05 yr) playing multiple sports. The dependent variables were verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor speed, reaction time, and total symptom score. The independent variable was sport type, categorized as collision, contact, noncontact, adjusted for the effect of the following covariables: age, concussion history, and comorbidities (learning disability, ADHD, psychiatric condition, headaches, migraines, speech therapy, special education, and repeating one of more years of school) using multivariable regression models.

Results: Female collision sport athletes reported significantly higher symptoms (9.81 ± 12.63) at baseline compared with contact (5.78 ± 9.25) or noncontact (6.39 ± 9.74) sport athletes ( P < 0.001). Using noncontact sports as a reference, there was no significant association between collision sport participation and cognitive composite scores (verbal memory: β = -0.57, 95% confidence interval = -1.80 to 0.66, P = 0.38; visual memory: β = -0.83, 95% confidence interval = -2.46 to 0.79, P = 0.31; visual motor speed: β = -0.21, 95% confidence interval = -1.01, 0.59, P = 0.61; reaction time: β = 0.01, 95% confidence interval = -0.01 to 0.02, P = 0.29).

Conclusions: Participation in collision sports appears to be associated with baseline symptoms but not neurocognitive functioning among female adolescent athletes.

碰撞型、接触型和非接触型女高中运动员的基线症状和神经认知表现。
目的:我们的目的是代表一个罕见的女性碰撞运动运动员队列,调查运动类型(碰撞、接触、非接触)、症状和基线神经认知评估表现之间的关联:我们对 75 128 名从事多种运动的女高中生运动员(年龄:15.27 ± 1.05 岁)进行了一项横断面研究,采用基线计算机化神经认知评分(ImPACT)。因变量为言语记忆、视觉记忆、视觉运动速度、反应时间和症状总分。自变量为运动类型,分为碰撞型、接触型和非接触型,使用多变量回归模型对以下共变因素的影响进行调整:年龄、脑震荡史和合并症(学习障碍、多动症、精神疾病、头痛、偏头痛、语言治疗、特殊教育和留级一年以上):与接触性(5.78±9.25)或非接触性(6.39±9.74)运动项目运动员相比,碰撞运动项目女运动员的基线症状(9.81±12.63)明显更高(p < 0.001)。以非接触式运动作为参照,碰撞运动的参与与认知综合得分之间没有明显关联(言语记忆:β = -0.57,95% 置信区间:-1.80,0.66,p = 0.38;视觉记忆:β=-0.83,95% 置信区间:-2.46,0.79,P=0.31;视觉运动速度:β=-0.21,95% 置信区间:-1.01,0.59,P=0.61;反应时间:β=0.01,95% 置信区间:-0.01,0.02,P=0.29):参与碰撞运动似乎与女性青少年运动员的基线症状有关,但与神经认知功能无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信