Can the Briganti 2019 nomogram be modified to predict lymph node metastasis risk in patients with prostate cancer detected with in-bore biopsy?

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Serdar Madendere, Mert Kılıç, Bengi Gürses, Metin Vural, Ayşe Armutlu, İbrahim Kulaç, Kayhan Tarım, Barış Esen, İbrahim Can Aykanat, Mert Veznikli, Abdullah Erdem Canda, Derya Balbay, Dilek Ertoy Baydar, Yakup Kordan, Tarık Esen
{"title":"Can the Briganti 2019 nomogram be modified to predict lymph node metastasis risk in patients with prostate cancer detected with in-bore biopsy?","authors":"Serdar Madendere,&nbsp;Mert Kılıç,&nbsp;Bengi Gürses,&nbsp;Metin Vural,&nbsp;Ayşe Armutlu,&nbsp;İbrahim Kulaç,&nbsp;Kayhan Tarım,&nbsp;Barış Esen,&nbsp;İbrahim Can Aykanat,&nbsp;Mert Veznikli,&nbsp;Abdullah Erdem Canda,&nbsp;Derya Balbay,&nbsp;Dilek Ertoy Baydar,&nbsp;Yakup Kordan,&nbsp;Tarık Esen","doi":"10.1111/iju.15553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to modify the Briganti 2019 nomogram and to test whether it is valid for patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer through in-bore prostate biopsies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data for 204 patients with positive multiparametric prostate MRI and prostate cancer identified either by mpMRI-cognitive/software fusion or in-bore biopsy and who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection between 2012 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The Briganti 2019 nomogram was applied to the mpMRI-cognitive/software fusion biopsy group (142 patients) in the original form, and then, two modifications were tested for the targeted component. Original and modified scores were compared. These modifications were adapted for the in-bore biopsy group (62 patients). The final histopathologic stage was regarded as the gold standard.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Nodal metastases were identified in 18/142 (12.6%) of mpMRI-cognitive/software fusion biopsy patients and 8/62 (12.9%) of the in-bore biopsy patients. In the mpMRI-cognitive/software fusion biopsy group, tumor size/core size (%) of targeted biopsy cores and positive core percentage on systematic biopsy were significant parameters for lymph node metastasis based on univariate logistic regression analyses (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). With the modifications of these parameters for the in-bore biopsy group, V1 modification of the Briganti 2019 nomogram provided 100% sensitivity and 31.5% specificity (AUC:0.627), while V2 modification provided 75% sensitivity and 46.3% specificity (AUC:0.645).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Briganti 2019 nomogram may be modified by utilizing tumor size/core size (%) for targeted biopsy cores instead of positive core percentage on systematic biopsy or by not taking both parameters into consideration to detect node metastasis risk of patients diagnosed with in-bore biopsies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":"31 11","pages":"1269-1277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iju.15553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to modify the Briganti 2019 nomogram and to test whether it is valid for patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer through in-bore prostate biopsies.

Methods

Data for 204 patients with positive multiparametric prostate MRI and prostate cancer identified either by mpMRI-cognitive/software fusion or in-bore biopsy and who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection between 2012 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The Briganti 2019 nomogram was applied to the mpMRI-cognitive/software fusion biopsy group (142 patients) in the original form, and then, two modifications were tested for the targeted component. Original and modified scores were compared. These modifications were adapted for the in-bore biopsy group (62 patients). The final histopathologic stage was regarded as the gold standard.

Results

Nodal metastases were identified in 18/142 (12.6%) of mpMRI-cognitive/software fusion biopsy patients and 8/62 (12.9%) of the in-bore biopsy patients. In the mpMRI-cognitive/software fusion biopsy group, tumor size/core size (%) of targeted biopsy cores and positive core percentage on systematic biopsy were significant parameters for lymph node metastasis based on univariate logistic regression analyses (p < 0.05). With the modifications of these parameters for the in-bore biopsy group, V1 modification of the Briganti 2019 nomogram provided 100% sensitivity and 31.5% specificity (AUC:0.627), while V2 modification provided 75% sensitivity and 46.3% specificity (AUC:0.645).

Conclusions

Briganti 2019 nomogram may be modified by utilizing tumor size/core size (%) for targeted biopsy cores instead of positive core percentage on systematic biopsy or by not taking both parameters into consideration to detect node metastasis risk of patients diagnosed with in-bore biopsies.

能否修改布里甘蒂 2019 提名图,以预测通过腔内活检发现的前列腺癌患者的淋巴结转移风险?
目的我们旨在修改 Briganti 2019 提名图,并检验该提名图是否适用于通过前列腺腔内活检确诊为前列腺癌的患者:回顾性分析了204名多参数前列腺MRI阳性患者的数据,这些患者通过mpMRI-认知/软件融合或腔内活检确定了前列腺癌,并在2012年至2023年期间接受了机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结扩大清扫术。对 mpMRI-认知/软件融合活检组(142 名患者)应用了原始形式的 Briganti 2019 提名图,然后对目标部分进行了两次修改测试。对原始得分和修改后得分进行了比较。孔内活检组(62 名患者)也采用了这些修改。最终的组织病理学分期被视为金标准:结果:在mpMRI-认知/软件融合活检患者中,有18/142(12.6%)人发现了结节转移;在钻孔活检患者中,有8/62(12.9%)人发现了结节转移。在 mpMRI-认知/软件融合活检组中,根据单变量逻辑回归分析,肿瘤大小/靶向活检核大小(%)和系统活检的阳性核百分比是淋巴结转移的重要参数(p 结论:在 mpMRI-认知/软件融合活检组中,肿瘤大小/靶向活检核大小(%)和系统活检的阳性核百分比是淋巴结转移的重要参数:Briganti 2019提名图可以通过利用靶向活检核心的肿瘤大小/核心大小(%)而非系统活检的阳性核心百分比,或者不考虑这两个参数来检测孔内活检患者的淋巴结转移风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Urology
International Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
340
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信