Proof of concept that melanoma nuclear count compares favourably with the benchmark histological prognostic feature, Breslow thickness.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Histopathology Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1111/his.15300
Charlotte Gurr, Mark Bamford, Nicola Oswald, Louisa Udensi, Christopher Ready, Kritika Gupta, Tiffany Buhagiar, Gerald Saldanha
{"title":"Proof of concept that melanoma nuclear count compares favourably with the benchmark histological prognostic feature, Breslow thickness.","authors":"Charlotte Gurr, Mark Bamford, Nicola Oswald, Louisa Udensi, Christopher Ready, Kritika Gupta, Tiffany Buhagiar, Gerald Saldanha","doi":"10.1111/his.15300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Breslow thickness (BT) is the most important histological prognostic feature for melanoma prognosis, but it only captures tumour size in one dimension. Adding a further measurement in a different axis has been shown to improve prognostic value. It seems reasonable that further prognostic value could be obtained by estimating the number of invasive melanoma cells using nuclear count. The aim of this study was to show proof of concept that nuclear count has prognostic value independent of BT.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Melanoma cell nuclei were labelled with SRY-related HMG-box 10 (SOX10) protein, the sections scanned and StarDist machine-learning algorithm used to count nuclei in 102 cases of primary cutaneous melanoma. Prognostic value was assessed using survival analyses. Nuclear count correlated strongly with T category, BT and calculated tumour area (each P < 0.001), suggesting that it was a valid marker of melanoma burden. Nuclear count was a predictor for overall survival in univariable analysis [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.25, confidence interval (CI) = 1.66-3.06, P < 0.001] and multivariable analysis (HR = 2.60, CI = 1.59-4.24, P < 0.001). BT and ulceration were significant in univariable analyses, but not in multivariable models with nuclear count. Models containing nuclear count showed the best fit. Similar results were seen for melanoma-specific and metastasis-free survival. Nuclear count was able to stratify melanomas within a given T stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated proof of concept that counting melanoma nuclei may be an improved measure of invasive tumour burden compared to BT. Future studies will need to refine methods of nuclear detection and also to confirm its prognostic value.</p>","PeriodicalId":13219,"journal":{"name":"Histopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/his.15300","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Breslow thickness (BT) is the most important histological prognostic feature for melanoma prognosis, but it only captures tumour size in one dimension. Adding a further measurement in a different axis has been shown to improve prognostic value. It seems reasonable that further prognostic value could be obtained by estimating the number of invasive melanoma cells using nuclear count. The aim of this study was to show proof of concept that nuclear count has prognostic value independent of BT.

Methods and results: Melanoma cell nuclei were labelled with SRY-related HMG-box 10 (SOX10) protein, the sections scanned and StarDist machine-learning algorithm used to count nuclei in 102 cases of primary cutaneous melanoma. Prognostic value was assessed using survival analyses. Nuclear count correlated strongly with T category, BT and calculated tumour area (each P < 0.001), suggesting that it was a valid marker of melanoma burden. Nuclear count was a predictor for overall survival in univariable analysis [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.25, confidence interval (CI) = 1.66-3.06, P < 0.001] and multivariable analysis (HR = 2.60, CI = 1.59-4.24, P < 0.001). BT and ulceration were significant in univariable analyses, but not in multivariable models with nuclear count. Models containing nuclear count showed the best fit. Similar results were seen for melanoma-specific and metastasis-free survival. Nuclear count was able to stratify melanomas within a given T stage.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated proof of concept that counting melanoma nuclei may be an improved measure of invasive tumour burden compared to BT. Future studies will need to refine methods of nuclear detection and also to confirm its prognostic value.

证明黑色素瘤核计数与组织学预后基准特征--布瑞斯洛厚度--相比具有优势。
目的:布瑞斯洛厚度(BT)是黑色素瘤预后最重要的组织学预后特征,但它只能从一个维度反映肿瘤的大小。事实证明,在不同的轴上增加进一步的测量可提高预后价值。通过核计数估算浸润性黑色素瘤细胞的数量,似乎可以进一步提高预后价值。本研究旨在证明核计数具有独立于 BT 的预后价值:用 SRY 相关 HMG-box 10 (SOX10) 蛋白标记黑色素瘤细胞核,扫描切片,使用 StarDist 机器学习算法对 102 例原发性皮肤黑色素瘤细胞核进行计数。通过生存分析评估了预后价值。核计数与 T 类、BT 和计算出的肿瘤面积密切相关(各 P 结论):这项研究证明了一个概念,即与 BT 相比,黑色素瘤核计数可能是衡量浸润性肿瘤负荷的更好方法。今后的研究需要改进核检测方法,并确认其预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Histopathology
Histopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
239
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Histopathology is an international journal intended to be of practical value to surgical and diagnostic histopathologists, and to investigators of human disease who employ histopathological methods. Our primary purpose is to publish advances in pathology, in particular those applicable to clinical practice and contributing to the better understanding of human disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信