Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in the treatment of macular edema secondary to necrotizing retinitis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
European Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1177/11206721241275729
Sergio Copete, Jose Gregorio García-García, Enrique Júdez
{"title":"Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in the treatment of macular edema secondary to necrotizing retinitis.","authors":"Sergio Copete, Jose Gregorio García-García, Enrique Júdez","doi":"10.1177/11206721241275729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe our experience with the use of a sustained-release dexamethasone implant in three patients with recalcitrant macular edema that developed after necrotizing retinitis in the context of the previously treated virus.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>Two immunocompetent patients presented with unilateral acute retinal necrosis (ARN) due to Varicella-Zoster (VZV). The other, an immunocompromised patient, presented with unilateral cytomegalovirus (CMV) necrotizing retinitis. The diagnoses were confirmed by anterior chamber polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and all were treated with oral valganciclovir and intravitreal ganciclovir (2 mg/0.1 ml). Infection was controlled but two of them required pars plana vitrectomy. Between 2 and 4 months after the resolution of signs of infection, resistant macular edema (RME) developed, and an intravitreal dexamethasone device was implanted after anterior chamber PCR had been negative. Functional and anatomical improvement was achieved, with the resolution of the edema accompanied by improvement in visual acuity in all patients. There was no evidence of reactivation at two years. No cataract or ocular hypertension was observed. One patient required two additional dexamethasone implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexamethasone intravitreal implant could be considered as an option for the treatment of macular edema developed after ARN. Care should be taken to avoid reactivation and patients need to be properly informed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241275729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe our experience with the use of a sustained-release dexamethasone implant in three patients with recalcitrant macular edema that developed after necrotizing retinitis in the context of the previously treated virus.

Case description: Two immunocompetent patients presented with unilateral acute retinal necrosis (ARN) due to Varicella-Zoster (VZV). The other, an immunocompromised patient, presented with unilateral cytomegalovirus (CMV) necrotizing retinitis. The diagnoses were confirmed by anterior chamber polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and all were treated with oral valganciclovir and intravitreal ganciclovir (2 mg/0.1 ml). Infection was controlled but two of them required pars plana vitrectomy. Between 2 and 4 months after the resolution of signs of infection, resistant macular edema (RME) developed, and an intravitreal dexamethasone device was implanted after anterior chamber PCR had been negative. Functional and anatomical improvement was achieved, with the resolution of the edema accompanied by improvement in visual acuity in all patients. There was no evidence of reactivation at two years. No cataract or ocular hypertension was observed. One patient required two additional dexamethasone implants.

Conclusion: Dexamethasone intravitreal implant could be considered as an option for the treatment of macular edema developed after ARN. Care should be taken to avoid reactivation and patients need to be properly informed.

地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂用于治疗继发于坏死性视网膜炎的黄斑水肿。
目的:描述我们使用地塞米松缓释植入剂治疗三例顽固性黄斑水肿患者的经验:两名免疫功能正常的患者因水痘-带状疱疹(VZV)而出现单侧急性视网膜坏死(ARN)。另一名免疫功能低下的患者则表现为单侧巨细胞病毒(CMV)坏死性视网膜炎。经前房聚合酶链反应(PCR)确诊,所有患者均接受了口服缬更昔洛韦和玻璃体内更昔洛韦(2 毫克/0.1 毫升)治疗。感染得到了控制,但其中两人需要进行玻璃体旁切除术。在感染症状消失后的 2 到 4 个月之间,出现了耐药性黄斑水肿(RME),在前房 PCR 阴性后,植入了玻璃体内地塞米松装置。所有患者在水肿消退的同时,视力也得到了改善。两年后,没有证据表明该病再次复发。未发现白内障或眼压升高。一名患者需要再植入两次地塞米松:结论:地塞米松玻璃体内植入物可作为治疗 ARN 后黄斑水肿的一种选择。结论:地塞米松玻璃体内植入物可作为治疗 ARN 后黄斑水肿的一种选择,但应注意避免再次激活,并适当告知患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信