Multivariable linear model for predicting graft weight based on 3-dimensional volumetry in regards to body weight change of living liver donor: an observational cohort study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Seungwook Han, Jinsoo Rhu, Soyoung Lim, Gyu-Seong Choi, Jong Man Kim, Jae-Won Joh
{"title":"Multivariable linear model for predicting graft weight based on 3-dimensional volumetry in regards to body weight change of living liver donor: an observational cohort study.","authors":"Seungwook Han, Jinsoo Rhu, Soyoung Lim, Gyu-Seong Choi, Jong Man Kim, Jae-Won Joh","doi":"10.4174/astr.2024.107.2.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to build a prediction model for estimating graft weight about different graft volumetry methods combined with other variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Donors who underwent living-donor right hepatectomy from March 2021 to March 2023 were included. Estimated graft volume measured by conventional method and 3-dimensional (3D) software were collected as well as the actual graft weight. Linear regression was used to build a prediction model. Donor groups were divided according to the 3D volumetry of <700 cm<sup>3</sup>, 700-899 cm<sup>3</sup>, and ≥900 cm<sup>3</sup> to compare the performance of different models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 119 donors were included. Conventional volumetry showed R<sup>2</sup> of 0.656 (P < 0.001) while 3D software showed R<sup>2</sup> of 0.776 (P < 0.001). The R<sup>2</sup> of the multivariable model was 0.842 (P < 0.001) including for 3D volume (β = 0.623, P < 0.001), body mass index (β = 7.648, P < 0.001), and amount of weight loss (β = -7.252, P < 0.001). The median errors between different models and actual graft weight did not differ in donor groups (<700 and 700-899 cm<sup>3</sup>), while the median error of univariable linear model using 3D software (122.5; interquartile range [IQR], 61.5-179.8) was significantly higher than multivariable-adjusted linear model (41.5; IQR, 24.8-69.8; P = 0.003) in donors with estimated graft weight ≥900 cm<sup>3</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The univariable 3D volumetry model showed an acceptable outcome for donors with an estimated graft volume <900 cm<sup>3</sup>. For donors with an estimated graft volume ≥900 cm<sup>3</sup>, the multivariable-adjusted linear model showed higher accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11317358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.107.2.91","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to build a prediction model for estimating graft weight about different graft volumetry methods combined with other variables.

Methods: Donors who underwent living-donor right hepatectomy from March 2021 to March 2023 were included. Estimated graft volume measured by conventional method and 3-dimensional (3D) software were collected as well as the actual graft weight. Linear regression was used to build a prediction model. Donor groups were divided according to the 3D volumetry of <700 cm3, 700-899 cm3, and ≥900 cm3 to compare the performance of different models.

Results: A total of 119 donors were included. Conventional volumetry showed R2 of 0.656 (P < 0.001) while 3D software showed R2 of 0.776 (P < 0.001). The R2 of the multivariable model was 0.842 (P < 0.001) including for 3D volume (β = 0.623, P < 0.001), body mass index (β = 7.648, P < 0.001), and amount of weight loss (β = -7.252, P < 0.001). The median errors between different models and actual graft weight did not differ in donor groups (<700 and 700-899 cm3), while the median error of univariable linear model using 3D software (122.5; interquartile range [IQR], 61.5-179.8) was significantly higher than multivariable-adjusted linear model (41.5; IQR, 24.8-69.8; P = 0.003) in donors with estimated graft weight ≥900 cm3.

Conclusion: The univariable 3D volumetry model showed an acceptable outcome for donors with an estimated graft volume <900 cm3. For donors with an estimated graft volume ≥900 cm3, the multivariable-adjusted linear model showed higher accuracy.

基于三维容积测量预测活体肝脏捐献者体重变化的多变量线性模型:一项观察性队列研究。
目的:本研究的目的是建立一个预测模型,用于估算不同移植物体积测量方法与其他变量相结合的移植物重量:方法:纳入 2021 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月期间接受活体右肝切除术的捐献者。收集通过传统方法和三维(3D)软件测量的估计移植物体积以及实际移植物重量。线性回归用于建立预测模型。根据三维体积测量结果将供体分为3、700-899立方厘米和≥900立方厘米三组,以比较不同模型的性能:结果:共纳入 119 名捐献者。传统容积测量法的 R2 为 0.656(P < 0.001),而三维软件的 R2 为 0.776(P < 0.001)。多变量模型的 R2 为 0.842(P < 0.001),包括三维体积(β = 0.623,P < 0.001)、体重指数(β = 7.648,P < 0.001)和体重减轻量(β = -7.252,P < 0.001)。不同模型与实际移植物重量的中位误差在供体组中没有差异(3),而在估计移植物重量≥900 cm3的供体中,使用三维软件的单变量线性模型的中位误差(122.5;四分位间差[IQR],61.5-179.8)明显高于多变量调整线性模型(41.5;IQR,24.8-69.8;P = 0.003):单变量三维容积测量模型显示,估计移植物容积为 3 的供体结果可以接受。对于估计移植物体积≥900 立方厘米的供体,多变量调整线性模型显示出更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信