Hemodynamic characteristics in ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective cohort study utilizing the AneurysmFlow™ tool.

Dang Luu Vu, Van Hoang Nguyen, Huu An Nguyen, Quang Anh Nguyen, Anh Tuan Tran, Hoang Kien Le, Tat Thien Nguyen, Thu Trang Nguyen, Cuong Tran, Xuan Bach Tran, Chi Cong Le, Laurent Pierot
{"title":"Hemodynamic characteristics in ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective cohort study utilizing the AneurysmFlow™ tool.","authors":"Dang Luu Vu, Van Hoang Nguyen, Huu An Nguyen, Quang Anh Nguyen, Anh Tuan Tran, Hoang Kien Le, Tat Thien Nguyen, Thu Trang Nguyen, Cuong Tran, Xuan Bach Tran, Chi Cong Le, Laurent Pierot","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Hemodynamic factors significantly influence the onset, progression, and rupture of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Current rupture risk prediction scores focus primarily on the clinical, anatomical and morphological aspects. This study aimed to investigate the hemodynamic characteristics differences between ruptured and unruptured IAs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Conducted from July 2021 to July 2022, this prospective cohort study involved patients with ruptured and unruptured IAs undergoing digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Hemodynamic characteristics were assessed using the AneurysmFlow™ tool. Hemodynamic, clinical, anatomical and morphological parameters were compared between ruptured and unruptured IA groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 127 patients with 135 aneurysms (67 ruptured, 68 unruptured). Complex flow patterns (type 3 and 4) were observed more frequently in ruptured aneurysms compared to unruptured aneurysms (odds ratio [OR], 5.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.49-12.45; P < 0.001) in univariate analysis, and were also more common in unruptured aneurysms associated with daughter sacs features (P = 0.015). The mean aneurysm flow amplitude (MAFA) was lower in ruptured aneurysms, and associated with lower flow velocity in the parent artery related to vasospasm. MAFA in the aneurysmal dome or any additional daughter sacs was lowest compared to other regions inside the aneurysms. The technical failure rate of AneurysmFlow™ measurements was 8.5% (12 out of 139 patients). Additionally, hypertension (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.30-0.54; P < 0.001), bifurcation location (AcomA/ACA/MCA/PcomA/posterior circulation) (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05-0.29; P = 0.005), and irregular shape (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.35; P = 0.012) were identified as independently associated with rupture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complex flow patterns identified on the AneurysmFlow™ tool are significantly more common in ruptured and unruptured aneurysms associated with daughter sac features. The lowest MAFA in the aneurysmal dome and daughter sacs likely indicates specific pathophysiological changes within the aneurysm wall associated with rupture incidence. Hypertension, bifurcation location, and an irregular shape are independently associated with the risk of rupture. Further multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>ACA = anterior cerebral artery; AcomA = anterior communicating artery; IAs = intracranial aneurysms; ICA = internal carotid artery; MAFA = mean aneurysm flow amplitude; MCA = middle cerebral artery; PcomA = posterior communicating artery; RIAs = ruptured intracranial aneurysms; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; UIAs = unruptured intracranial aneurysms.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Hemodynamic factors significantly influence the onset, progression, and rupture of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Current rupture risk prediction scores focus primarily on the clinical, anatomical and morphological aspects. This study aimed to investigate the hemodynamic characteristics differences between ruptured and unruptured IAs.

Materials and methods: Conducted from July 2021 to July 2022, this prospective cohort study involved patients with ruptured and unruptured IAs undergoing digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Hemodynamic characteristics were assessed using the AneurysmFlow™ tool. Hemodynamic, clinical, anatomical and morphological parameters were compared between ruptured and unruptured IA groups.

Results: The study included 127 patients with 135 aneurysms (67 ruptured, 68 unruptured). Complex flow patterns (type 3 and 4) were observed more frequently in ruptured aneurysms compared to unruptured aneurysms (odds ratio [OR], 5.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.49-12.45; P < 0.001) in univariate analysis, and were also more common in unruptured aneurysms associated with daughter sacs features (P = 0.015). The mean aneurysm flow amplitude (MAFA) was lower in ruptured aneurysms, and associated with lower flow velocity in the parent artery related to vasospasm. MAFA in the aneurysmal dome or any additional daughter sacs was lowest compared to other regions inside the aneurysms. The technical failure rate of AneurysmFlow™ measurements was 8.5% (12 out of 139 patients). Additionally, hypertension (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.30-0.54; P < 0.001), bifurcation location (AcomA/ACA/MCA/PcomA/posterior circulation) (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05-0.29; P = 0.005), and irregular shape (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.35; P = 0.012) were identified as independently associated with rupture.

Conclusions: Complex flow patterns identified on the AneurysmFlow™ tool are significantly more common in ruptured and unruptured aneurysms associated with daughter sac features. The lowest MAFA in the aneurysmal dome and daughter sacs likely indicates specific pathophysiological changes within the aneurysm wall associated with rupture incidence. Hypertension, bifurcation location, and an irregular shape are independently associated with the risk of rupture. Further multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings.

Abbreviations: ACA = anterior cerebral artery; AcomA = anterior communicating artery; IAs = intracranial aneurysms; ICA = internal carotid artery; MAFA = mean aneurysm flow amplitude; MCA = middle cerebral artery; PcomA = posterior communicating artery; RIAs = ruptured intracranial aneurysms; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; UIAs = unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

破裂和未破裂颅内动脉瘤的血液动力学特征:利用 AneurysmFlow™ 工具进行的前瞻性队列研究。
背景和目的:血流动力学因素对颅内动脉瘤(IAs)的发生、发展和破裂有重大影响。目前的破裂风险预测评分主要侧重于临床、解剖和形态学方面。本研究旨在探讨已破裂和未破裂颅内动脉瘤的血液动力学特征差异:这项前瞻性队列研究于2021年7月至2022年7月进行,涉及接受数字减影血管造影术(DSA)的破裂和未破裂IA患者。使用 AneurysmFlow™ 工具评估血液动力学特征。对破裂组和未破裂组的血流动力学、临床、解剖和形态学参数进行比较:研究包括 127 名患者,135 个动脉瘤(67 个破裂,68 个未破裂)。在单变量分析中,复杂血流模式(3 型和 4 型)在破裂动脉瘤中比在未破裂动脉瘤中更常见(几率比 [OR],5.57;95% 置信区间 [CI],2.49-12.45;P <0.001),在与子囊特征相关的未破裂动脉瘤中也更常见(P = 0.015)。破裂动脉瘤的平均动脉血流振幅(MAFA)较低,与血管痉挛相关的母动脉血流速度较低有关。与动脉瘤内的其他区域相比,动脉瘤穹顶或任何额外子囊的平均动脉瘤流量振幅最低。AneurysmFlow™ 测量的技术失败率为 8.5%(139 例患者中有 12 例)。此外,高血压(OR,0.42;95% CI,0.30-0.54;P <0.001)、分叉位置(AcomA/ACA/MCA/PcomA/后循环)(OR,0.17;95% CI,0.05-0.29;P = 0.005)和不规则形状(OR,0.19;95% CI,0.05-0.35;P = 0.012)被认为与破裂独立相关:结论:动脉瘤血流(AneurysmFlow™)工具识别出的复杂血流模式在与子囊特征相关的破裂动脉瘤和未破裂动脉瘤中更为常见。动脉瘤穹隆和子囊中最低的 MAFA 可能表明动脉瘤壁内与破裂发生率相关的特定病理生理变化。高血压、分叉位置和不规则形状与破裂风险独立相关。要验证这些发现,需要进一步开展样本量更大的多中心研究:缩写:ACA = 大脑前动脉;AcomA = 前交通动脉;IAs = 颅内动脉瘤;ICA = 颈内动脉;MAFA = 平均动脉瘤血流振幅;MCA = 大脑中动脉;PcomA = 后交通动脉;RIAs = 破裂的颅内动脉瘤;SAH = 蛛网膜下腔出血;UIAs = 未破裂的颅内动脉瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信