Chemical respiratory sensitization-Current status of mechanistic understanding, knowledge gaps and possible identification methods of sensitizers.

IF 3.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Frontiers in toxicology Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ftox.2024.1331803
Rita Hargitai, Lucia Parráková, Tünde Szatmári, Pablo Monfort-Lanzas, Valentina Galbiati, Karine Audouze, Florence Jornod, Yvonne C M Staal, Sabina Burla, Aline Chary, Arno C Gutleb, Katalin Lumniczky, Rob J Vandebriel, Johanna M Gostner
{"title":"Chemical respiratory sensitization-Current status of mechanistic understanding, knowledge gaps and possible identification methods of sensitizers.","authors":"Rita Hargitai, Lucia Parráková, Tünde Szatmári, Pablo Monfort-Lanzas, Valentina Galbiati, Karine Audouze, Florence Jornod, Yvonne C M Staal, Sabina Burla, Aline Chary, Arno C Gutleb, Katalin Lumniczky, Rob J Vandebriel, Johanna M Gostner","doi":"10.3389/ftox.2024.1331803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Respiratory sensitization is a complex immunological process eventually leading to hypersensitivity following re-exposure to the chemical. A frequent consequence is occupational asthma, which may occur after long latency periods. Although chemical-induced respiratory hypersensitivity has been known for decades, there are currently no comprehensive and validated approaches available for the prospective identification of chemicals that induce respiratory sensitization, while the expectations of new approach methodologies (NAMs) are high. A great hope is that due to a better understanding of the molecular key events, new methods can be developed now. However, this is a big challenge due to the different chemical classes to which respiratory sensitizers belong, as well as because of the complexity of the response and the late manifestation of symptoms. In this review article, the current information on respiratory sensitization related processes is summarized by introducing it in the available adverse outcome pathway (AOP) concept. Potentially useful models for prediction are discussed. Knowledge gaps and gaps of regulatory concern are identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":73111,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11317441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2024.1331803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Respiratory sensitization is a complex immunological process eventually leading to hypersensitivity following re-exposure to the chemical. A frequent consequence is occupational asthma, which may occur after long latency periods. Although chemical-induced respiratory hypersensitivity has been known for decades, there are currently no comprehensive and validated approaches available for the prospective identification of chemicals that induce respiratory sensitization, while the expectations of new approach methodologies (NAMs) are high. A great hope is that due to a better understanding of the molecular key events, new methods can be developed now. However, this is a big challenge due to the different chemical classes to which respiratory sensitizers belong, as well as because of the complexity of the response and the late manifestation of symptoms. In this review article, the current information on respiratory sensitization related processes is summarized by introducing it in the available adverse outcome pathway (AOP) concept. Potentially useful models for prediction are discussed. Knowledge gaps and gaps of regulatory concern are identified.

化学呼吸道致敏--对致敏剂的机理认识现状、知识差距和可能的识别方法。
呼吸道过敏是一个复杂的免疫过程,最终会在再次接触化学品后导致超敏反应。一个常见的后果是职业性哮喘,它可能在长期潜伏后发生。尽管人们对化学物质诱发的呼吸道过敏症已有几十年的了解,但目前还没有全面、有效的方法来前瞻性地识别诱发呼吸道过敏症的化学物质,而人们对新方法(NAM)寄予厚望。人们对新方法寄予厚望,希望通过更好地了解分子关键事件,现在就能开发出新的方法。然而,由于呼吸道致敏物质属于不同的化学类别,以及反应的复杂性和症状的晚期表现,这是一个巨大的挑战。在这篇综述文章中,通过引入现有的不良后果途径(AOP)概念,总结了呼吸道致敏相关过程的现有信息。文章还讨论了可能有用的预测模型。文章还指出了知识差距和监管方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信