[Utility of abdominal ultrasonography in the management of ulcerative colitis:proposal of a new scoring system].

Q4 Medicine
Shinsuke Sato, Kentaro Ikeya, Ryosuke Takano, Ai Matsuura, Yuji Ota, Hiroyuki Hanai
{"title":"[Utility of abdominal ultrasonography in the management of ulcerative colitis:proposal of a new scoring system].","authors":"Shinsuke Sato, Kentaro Ikeya, Ryosuke Takano, Ai Matsuura, Yuji Ota, Hiroyuki Hanai","doi":"10.11405/nisshoshi.121.675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the management of ulcerative colitis (UC), colonoscopy (CS) is considered essential for diagnosis;however, its invasiveness poses a challenge. Conversely, recent advancements in ultrasound diagnostic devices have improved imaging quality for the digestive tract, rendering them valuable in UC management. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate the correlation between abdominal ultrasonography (AUS) and CS in assessing UC activity. The indices adopted for UC evaluation using AUS were as follows:1) bowel wall stratification, 2) bowel wall thickness, 3) bowel wall flow at power Doppler, 4) presence of increased brightness of inflammatory fat, and 5) presence of mesenteric lymph node swelling greater than 5mm. Subsequently, we developed a new AUS index for UC, termed the UCUS score, which comprises the aforementioned five indices. Finally, we compared the UCUS score with representative endoscopic indices, the Mayo endoscopic sub-score, and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity. The results demonstrated that our proposed UCUS score better reflected disease activity than individual items assessed separately. ROC curve analysis revealed a UCUS score cutoff of 3 points. Therefore, a UCUS score of ≥3 points indicates the need for further examination with CS. Conversely, a score below 3 points suggests low disease activity, and in situations when evaluating treatment effectiveness, AUS could potentially substitute for CS. We believe that the UCUS score is an important source of information to understand the patient's condition and to motivate the patient to undergo endoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":35808,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11405/nisshoshi.121.675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the management of ulcerative colitis (UC), colonoscopy (CS) is considered essential for diagnosis;however, its invasiveness poses a challenge. Conversely, recent advancements in ultrasound diagnostic devices have improved imaging quality for the digestive tract, rendering them valuable in UC management. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate the correlation between abdominal ultrasonography (AUS) and CS in assessing UC activity. The indices adopted for UC evaluation using AUS were as follows:1) bowel wall stratification, 2) bowel wall thickness, 3) bowel wall flow at power Doppler, 4) presence of increased brightness of inflammatory fat, and 5) presence of mesenteric lymph node swelling greater than 5mm. Subsequently, we developed a new AUS index for UC, termed the UCUS score, which comprises the aforementioned five indices. Finally, we compared the UCUS score with representative endoscopic indices, the Mayo endoscopic sub-score, and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity. The results demonstrated that our proposed UCUS score better reflected disease activity than individual items assessed separately. ROC curve analysis revealed a UCUS score cutoff of 3 points. Therefore, a UCUS score of ≥3 points indicates the need for further examination with CS. Conversely, a score below 3 points suggests low disease activity, and in situations when evaluating treatment effectiveness, AUS could potentially substitute for CS. We believe that the UCUS score is an important source of information to understand the patient's condition and to motivate the patient to undergo endoscopy.

[腹部超声波检查在溃疡性结肠炎治疗中的作用:新评分系统的建议]。
在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的治疗中,结肠镜检查(CS)被认为是必不可少的诊断方法;然而,结肠镜检查的侵入性带来了挑战。相反,超声诊断设备的最新进展提高了消化道的成像质量,使其在溃疡性结肠炎的治疗中具有重要价值。因此,本研究旨在阐明腹部超声成像(AUS)与 CS 在评估 UC 活动性方面的相关性。采用 AUS 评估 UC 的指标如下:1)肠壁分层;2)肠壁厚度;3)功率多普勒显示的肠壁血流;4)炎性脂肪亮度是否增加;5)肠系膜淋巴结是否肿大超过 5mm。随后,我们为 UC 制定了一个新的 AUS 指标,称为 UCUS 评分,其中包括上述五个指标。最后,我们将 UCUS 评分与具有代表性的内镜指标、梅奥内镜子评分和溃疡性结肠炎内镜严重程度指数进行了比较。结果表明,与单独评估各个项目相比,我们提出的 UCUS 评分能更好地反映疾病活动性。ROC 曲线分析显示,UCUS 评分的临界值为 3 分。因此,UCUS 评分≥3 分表明需要进一步进行 CS 检查。相反,低于 3 分则表明疾病活动度低,在评估治疗效果时,AUS 有可能替代 CS。我们认为,UCUS 评分是了解患者病情和促使患者接受内镜检查的重要信息来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Gastroenterology
Japanese Journal of Gastroenterology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastroenterology, which is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, publishes Original Articles (Alimentary Tract/Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract), Review Articles, Letters to the Editors and other articles on all aspects of the field of gastroenterology. Significant contributions relating to basic research, theory, and practice are welcomed. These publications are designed to disseminate knowledge in this field to a worldwide audience, and accordingly, its editorial board has an international membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信