Transcatheter Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure in Premature Infants: Comparison of Echocardiogram and Angiogram Measurements.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Bassel Mohammad Nijres, Mohamed Khallaf, Adrianne Rahde Bischoff, Kaitlin Carr, Umang Gupta, Patrick J McNamara, Jimmy Windsor, Osamah Aldoss
{"title":"Transcatheter Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure in Premature Infants: Comparison of Echocardiogram and Angiogram Measurements.","authors":"Bassel Mohammad Nijres, Mohamed Khallaf, Adrianne Rahde Bischoff, Kaitlin Carr, Umang Gupta, Patrick J McNamara, Jimmy Windsor, Osamah Aldoss","doi":"10.1007/s00246-024-03620-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure (TCPC) utilizing transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) as the sole imaging guide could simplify care. This single-center study compares PDA dimensions obtained from the TTE and angiogram images of patients who underwent attempted TCPC at Stead Family Children's Hospital from 10/01/2019 to 10/31/2020. Blinded investigators measured these dimensions solely for this study and had no impact on clinical care. Also, a hypothetical Piccolo device size was chosen based on the TTE dimensions and another on the angiographic dimensions, and then the correlation was analyzed. Sixty-two patients underwent TCPC attempts. TTE tends to overestimate the PDA narrowest dimension and underestimate the PDA length and aortic end dimension. Linear regression analysis revealed a weak correlation between the length and aortic diameter (R = 0.37 and 0.21, respectively). A modest correlation was observed for the smallest dimension without color Doppler (R = 0.57) and with color Doppler, which was utilized when needed (R = 0.6). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a smaller mean difference between the TTE and angiogram measurements of the narrowest diameter without color Doppler (0.4 mm) and with color Doppler (used as needed) (0.4 mm). However, the mean difference is larger for the aortic end (- 1.64 mm) and the length (- 1.73 mm). TTE accurately predicted the Piccolo device size in 43 (72%) patients and overestimated the size in 17 (28%) patients to the next size. Our findings should be verified with further studies, and additional development of protocols is needed to use TTE to guide TCPC without fluoroscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-024-03620-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure (TCPC) utilizing transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) as the sole imaging guide could simplify care. This single-center study compares PDA dimensions obtained from the TTE and angiogram images of patients who underwent attempted TCPC at Stead Family Children's Hospital from 10/01/2019 to 10/31/2020. Blinded investigators measured these dimensions solely for this study and had no impact on clinical care. Also, a hypothetical Piccolo device size was chosen based on the TTE dimensions and another on the angiographic dimensions, and then the correlation was analyzed. Sixty-two patients underwent TCPC attempts. TTE tends to overestimate the PDA narrowest dimension and underestimate the PDA length and aortic end dimension. Linear regression analysis revealed a weak correlation between the length and aortic diameter (R = 0.37 and 0.21, respectively). A modest correlation was observed for the smallest dimension without color Doppler (R = 0.57) and with color Doppler, which was utilized when needed (R = 0.6). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a smaller mean difference between the TTE and angiogram measurements of the narrowest diameter without color Doppler (0.4 mm) and with color Doppler (used as needed) (0.4 mm). However, the mean difference is larger for the aortic end (- 1.64 mm) and the length (- 1.73 mm). TTE accurately predicted the Piccolo device size in 43 (72%) patients and overestimated the size in 17 (28%) patients to the next size. Our findings should be verified with further studies, and additional development of protocols is needed to use TTE to guide TCPC without fluoroscopy.

Abstract Image

早产儿经导管动脉导管未闭:超声心动图与血管造影测量结果的比较。
经导管动脉导管未闭(PDA)闭合术(TCPC)使用经胸超声心动图(TTE)作为唯一的成像指导,可以简化护理。这项单中心研究比较了 2019 年 1 月 10 日至 2020 年 10 月 31 日期间在施泰德家庭儿童医院接受 TCPC 尝试的患者从 TTE 和血管造影图像中获得的 PDA 尺寸。盲法研究人员仅为本研究测量了这些尺寸,对临床护理没有任何影响。此外,还根据 TTE 尺寸和血管造影尺寸分别选择了一个假定的 Piccolo 装置尺寸,然后对相关性进行了分析。62 名患者进行了 TCPC 尝试。TTE 往往会高估 PDA 最窄尺寸,低估 PDA 长度和主动脉末端尺寸。线性回归分析显示,长度和主动脉直径之间的相关性较弱(R = 0.37 和 0.21)。在不使用彩色多普勒的情况下(R = 0.57),以及在需要时使用彩色多普勒的情况下(R = 0.6),观察到最小尺寸之间存在适度的相关性。Bland-Altman 分析显示,在不使用彩色多普勒的情况下,TTE 和血管造影测量的最窄直径的平均差异较小(0.4 毫米),而在使用彩色多普勒(必要时使用)的情况下,两者的平均差异较小(0.4 毫米)。但是,主动脉末端(- 1.64 毫米)和长度(- 1.73 毫米)的平均差异较大。TTE 准确预测了 43 例(72%)患者的 Piccolo 装置尺寸,高估了 17 例(28%)患者的下一尺寸。我们的研究结果还需进一步研究验证,并且需要进一步制定方案,以便在不进行透视的情况下使用 TTE 指导 TCPC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Cardiology
Pediatric Cardiology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
258
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信