Automatic deep learning segmentation of the hippocampus on high-resolution diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and its application to the healthy lifespan.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
NMR in Biomedicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1002/nbm.5227
Dylan Miller, Cory Efird, Kevin Grant Solar, Christian Beaulieu, Dana Cobzas
{"title":"Automatic deep learning segmentation of the hippocampus on high-resolution diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and its application to the healthy lifespan.","authors":"Dylan Miller, Cory Efird, Kevin Grant Solar, Christian Beaulieu, Dana Cobzas","doi":"10.1002/nbm.5227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can provide unique contrast and insight into microstructural changes with age or disease of the hippocampus, although it is difficult to measure the hippocampus because of its comparatively small size, location, and shape. This has been markedly improved by the advent of a clinically feasible 1-mm isotropic resolution 6-min DTI protocol at 3 T of the hippocampus with limited brain coverage of 20 axial-oblique slices aligned along its long axis. However, manual segmentation is too laborious for large population studies, and it cannot be automatically segmented directly on the diffusion images using traditional T<sub>1</sub> or T<sub>2</sub> image-based methods because of the limited brain coverage and different contrast. An automatic method is proposed here that segments the hippocampus directly on high-resolution diffusion images based on an extension of well-known deep learning architectures like UNet and UNet++ by including additional dense residual connections. The method was trained on 100 healthy participants with previously performed manual segmentation on the 1-mm DTI, then evaluated on typical healthy participants (n = 53), yielding an excellent voxel overlap with a Dice score of ~ 0.90 with manual segmentation; notably, this was comparable with the inter-rater reliability of manually delineating the hippocampus on diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Dice score of 0.86). This method also generalized to a different DTI protocol with 36% fewer acquisitions. It was further validated by showing similar age trajectories of volumes, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity from manual segmentations in one cohort (n = 153, age 5-74 years) with automatic segmentations from a second cohort without manual segmentations (n = 354, age 5-90 years). Automated high-resolution diffusion MRI segmentation of the hippocampus will facilitate large cohort analyses and, in future research, needs to be evaluated on patient groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":19309,"journal":{"name":"NMR in Biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":"e5227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMR in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.5227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can provide unique contrast and insight into microstructural changes with age or disease of the hippocampus, although it is difficult to measure the hippocampus because of its comparatively small size, location, and shape. This has been markedly improved by the advent of a clinically feasible 1-mm isotropic resolution 6-min DTI protocol at 3 T of the hippocampus with limited brain coverage of 20 axial-oblique slices aligned along its long axis. However, manual segmentation is too laborious for large population studies, and it cannot be automatically segmented directly on the diffusion images using traditional T1 or T2 image-based methods because of the limited brain coverage and different contrast. An automatic method is proposed here that segments the hippocampus directly on high-resolution diffusion images based on an extension of well-known deep learning architectures like UNet and UNet++ by including additional dense residual connections. The method was trained on 100 healthy participants with previously performed manual segmentation on the 1-mm DTI, then evaluated on typical healthy participants (n = 53), yielding an excellent voxel overlap with a Dice score of ~ 0.90 with manual segmentation; notably, this was comparable with the inter-rater reliability of manually delineating the hippocampus on diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Dice score of 0.86). This method also generalized to a different DTI protocol with 36% fewer acquisitions. It was further validated by showing similar age trajectories of volumes, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity from manual segmentations in one cohort (n = 153, age 5-74 years) with automatic segmentations from a second cohort without manual segmentations (n = 354, age 5-90 years). Automated high-resolution diffusion MRI segmentation of the hippocampus will facilitate large cohort analyses and, in future research, needs to be evaluated on patient groups.

高分辨率弥散磁共振成像上的海马区自动深度学习分割及其在健康寿命中的应用。
弥散张量成像(DTI)可以提供独特的对比度,让人深入了解海马随年龄或疾病发生的微观结构变化,但由于海马的体积、位置和形状相对较小,因此很难对其进行测量。临床上可行的海马 1 毫米各向同性分辨率 6 分钟 DTI 方案的出现明显改善了这一问题,该方案在 3 T 下对海马进行了有限的脑覆盖,包括 20 张沿海马长轴排列的轴向-斜向切片。然而,对于大规模人群研究来说,手动分割过于费力,而且由于大脑覆盖范围有限且对比度不同,无法使用传统的基于 T1 或 T2 图像的方法直接在弥散图像上进行自动分割。本文提出了一种自动方法,基于对 UNet 和 UNet++ 等著名深度学习架构的扩展,加入额外的密集残余连接,直接在高分辨率扩散图像上分割海马体。该方法在 100 名健康参与者身上进行了训练,他们之前在 1 毫米 DTI 上进行了手动分割,然后在典型的健康参与者(n = 53)身上进行了评估,结果显示,手动分割的体素重叠度非常好,Dice 得分为约 0.90;值得注意的是,这与在弥散磁共振成像(MRI)上手动划分海马的评分者间可靠性(Dice 得分为 0.86)相当。这种方法还适用于采集次数减少 36% 的不同 DTI 方案。在一个队列(n = 153,年龄 5-74 岁)中,手动分割的体积、分数各向异性和平均弥散度的年龄轨迹与在第二个队列(n = 354,年龄 5-90 岁)中未进行手动分割的自动分割的体积、分数各向异性和平均弥散度的年龄轨迹相似,从而进一步验证了该方法。海马体的自动高分辨率弥散核磁共振成像分割有助于进行大规模队列分析,在未来的研究中,需要对患者群体进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NMR in Biomedicine
NMR in Biomedicine 医学-光谱学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
209
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: NMR in Biomedicine is a journal devoted to the publication of original full-length papers, rapid communications and review articles describing the development of magnetic resonance spectroscopy or imaging methods or their use to investigate physiological, biochemical, biophysical or medical problems. Topics for submitted papers should be in one of the following general categories: (a) development of methods and instrumentation for MR of biological systems; (b) studies of normal or diseased organs, tissues or cells; (c) diagnosis or treatment of disease. Reports may cover work on patients or healthy human subjects, in vivo animal experiments, studies of isolated organs or cultured cells, analysis of tissue extracts, NMR theory, experimental techniques, or instrumentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信