Perceived organizational change strengthens organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior via increased organizational nostalgia.

IF 9.4 1区 心理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Marius van Dijke, Yiran Guo, Tim Wildschut, Constantine Sedikides
{"title":"Perceived organizational change strengthens organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior via increased organizational nostalgia.","authors":"Marius van Dijke, Yiran Guo, Tim Wildschut, Constantine Sedikides","doi":"10.1037/apl0001221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Organizational change has been thought to evoke negative employee responses, yet it is ubiquitous in modern market economies. It is thus surprising that the adverse effects of organizational change are not more visible or apparently disrupting. We hypothesized that, although perceived organizational change, by inducing change apprehension, stimulates negative employee responses (i.e., lower organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior [OCB]), it also elicits organizational nostalgia, which engenders positive employee responses (higher organizational commitment and OCB). We tested our hypotheses in nine studies. First, across four experiments (two preregistered), perceived societal or organizational change elicited organizational nostalgia and, via organizational nostalgia, increased employees' organizational commitment and OCB. Subsequently, in two preregistered experiments, induced organizational nostalgia (vs. control) strengthened employees' commitment to the changed organization and galvanized their defense of organizational change. Finally, in a preregistered follow-up experiment and two preregistered surveys, we tested and validated our full model regarding the opposing mediating roles of change apprehension and organizational nostalgia. The findings help to understand why effects of organizational change are less disruptive than might be expected and clarify the role of organizational nostalgia during organizational change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001221","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizational change has been thought to evoke negative employee responses, yet it is ubiquitous in modern market economies. It is thus surprising that the adverse effects of organizational change are not more visible or apparently disrupting. We hypothesized that, although perceived organizational change, by inducing change apprehension, stimulates negative employee responses (i.e., lower organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior [OCB]), it also elicits organizational nostalgia, which engenders positive employee responses (higher organizational commitment and OCB). We tested our hypotheses in nine studies. First, across four experiments (two preregistered), perceived societal or organizational change elicited organizational nostalgia and, via organizational nostalgia, increased employees' organizational commitment and OCB. Subsequently, in two preregistered experiments, induced organizational nostalgia (vs. control) strengthened employees' commitment to the changed organization and galvanized their defense of organizational change. Finally, in a preregistered follow-up experiment and two preregistered surveys, we tested and validated our full model regarding the opposing mediating roles of change apprehension and organizational nostalgia. The findings help to understand why effects of organizational change are less disruptive than might be expected and clarify the role of organizational nostalgia during organizational change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

感知到的组织变革会通过增加组织怀旧感来加强组织承诺和组织公民行为。
组织变革一直被认为会引起员工的消极反应,但在现代市场经济中,组织变革却无处不在。因此,令人惊讶的是,组织变革的负面影响并没有更加明显或明显具有破坏性。我们假设,虽然感知到的组织变革会引起变革忧虑,从而激发员工的消极反应(即较低的组织承诺和组织公民行为[OCB]),但它也会引起组织怀旧情绪,从而激发员工的积极反应(较高的组织承诺和组织公民行为)。我们在九项研究中检验了我们的假设。首先,在四项实验(其中两项是预先登记的)中,感知到的社会或组织变革会引发组织怀旧情绪,并通过组织怀旧情绪提高员工的组织承诺和组织合作行为。随后,在两个预先登记的实验中,诱导的组织怀旧(与对照组相比)加强了员工对变革组织的承诺,并激发了他们对组织变革的捍卫。最后,在一项预先登记的后续实验和两项预先登记的调查中,我们就变革忧虑和组织怀旧的对立中介作用测试并验证了我们的完整模型。研究结果有助于理解为什么组织变革的破坏性比预期的要小,并阐明了组织怀旧在组织变革中的作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Psychology® focuses on publishing original investigations that contribute new knowledge and understanding to fields of applied psychology (excluding clinical and applied experimental or human factors, which are better suited for other APA journals). The journal primarily considers empirical and theoretical investigations that enhance understanding of cognitive, motivational, affective, and behavioral psychological phenomena in work and organizational settings. These phenomena can occur at individual, group, organizational, or cultural levels, and in various work settings such as business, education, training, health, service, government, or military institutions. The journal welcomes submissions from both public and private sector organizations, for-profit or nonprofit. It publishes several types of articles, including: 1.Rigorously conducted empirical investigations that expand conceptual understanding (original investigations or meta-analyses). 2.Theory development articles and integrative conceptual reviews that synthesize literature and generate new theories on psychological phenomena to stimulate novel research. 3.Rigorously conducted qualitative research on phenomena that are challenging to capture with quantitative methods or require inductive theory building.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信