Feasibility of Telerehabilitation-Monitored Functional Electrical Stimulation on Walking and Quality of Life in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Case Series.

Q1 Nursing
International journal of MS care Pub Date : 2024-08-12 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.7224/1537-2073.2023-081
Elliot J Gann, Mark M Mañago, Diane D Allen, Elie Celnikier, Valerie J Block
{"title":"Feasibility of Telerehabilitation-Monitored Functional Electrical Stimulation on Walking and Quality of Life in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Case Series.","authors":"Elliot J Gann, Mark M Mañago, Diane D Allen, Elie Celnikier, Valerie J Block","doi":"10.7224/1537-2073.2023-081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Foot drop in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) commonly leads to decreased mobility and quality of life (QOL). Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the peroneal nerve can improve the gait of people with foot drop, yet various barriers restrict widespread use. The purpose of this case series was to examine the feasibility of a telerehabilitation-monitored FES device and report changes in functional mobility and QOL in people with moderate MS-related disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FES use was progressed over 8 weeks via 3 telerehabilitation sessions. Feasibility of telerehabilitation was assessed by percentage of telerehabilitation visits completed and participant-reported satisfaction. At baseline and study completion, functional mobility with and without FES were assessed by the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), and the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12). Fatigue was assessed via the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) before and after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven participants (mean age = 50.4 years [SD 10.8]; 2 males) completed the study. All (33/33) telerehabilitation visits were completed and participants attained high levels of satisfaction with no adverse events. At 8 weeks, compared to baseline, there were clinically meaningful improvements on the T25FW, 2MWT, and TUG for 45%, 55%, and 82% of participants, respectively. Clinically meaningful improvements on the MSIS-29 and MSWS-12 were also recorded for 64% and 36% of participants, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telerehabilitation was safe and feasible for FES intervention, and improvements in functional mobility and QOL were observed. Telerehabilitation to monitor FES may improve access and reduce patient burden; therefore, studying its efficacy is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14150,"journal":{"name":"International journal of MS care","volume":"26 Q3","pages":"214-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11317766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of MS care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2023-081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Foot drop in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) commonly leads to decreased mobility and quality of life (QOL). Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the peroneal nerve can improve the gait of people with foot drop, yet various barriers restrict widespread use. The purpose of this case series was to examine the feasibility of a telerehabilitation-monitored FES device and report changes in functional mobility and QOL in people with moderate MS-related disability.

Methods: FES use was progressed over 8 weeks via 3 telerehabilitation sessions. Feasibility of telerehabilitation was assessed by percentage of telerehabilitation visits completed and participant-reported satisfaction. At baseline and study completion, functional mobility with and without FES were assessed by the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), and the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12). Fatigue was assessed via the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) before and after the intervention.

Results: Eleven participants (mean age = 50.4 years [SD 10.8]; 2 males) completed the study. All (33/33) telerehabilitation visits were completed and participants attained high levels of satisfaction with no adverse events. At 8 weeks, compared to baseline, there were clinically meaningful improvements on the T25FW, 2MWT, and TUG for 45%, 55%, and 82% of participants, respectively. Clinically meaningful improvements on the MSIS-29 and MSWS-12 were also recorded for 64% and 36% of participants, respectively.

Conclusions: Telerehabilitation was safe and feasible for FES intervention, and improvements in functional mobility and QOL were observed. Telerehabilitation to monitor FES may improve access and reduce patient burden; therefore, studying its efficacy is warranted.

远程康复监测功能性电刺激对多发性硬化症患者行走和生活质量的可行性:病例系列。
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)患者足下垂通常会导致活动能力和生活质量(QOL)下降。腓总神经的功能性电刺激(FES)可以改善足下垂患者的步态,但各种障碍限制了它的广泛应用。本系列病例旨在研究远程康复监测 FES 设备的可行性,并报告中度多发性硬化症相关残疾患者在功能活动能力和 QOL 方面的变化:方法:通过3次远程康复治疗,在8周内逐步使用FES。远程康复的可行性通过完成远程康复访问的百分比和参与者报告的满意度进行评估。在基线和研究完成时,通过定时 25 英尺步行 (T25FW)、定时起立行走 (TUG) 和 2 分钟步行测试 (2MWT)、多发性硬化影响量表 (MSIS-29) 以及 12 项多发性硬化步行量表 (MSWS-12) 对使用和未使用 FES 的功能活动能力进行评估。通过改良疲劳影响量表(MFIS)对干预前后的疲劳情况进行评估:11 名参与者(平均年龄 = 50.4 岁 [SD 10.8];2 名男性)完成了研究。所有(33/33)远程康复访问均已完成,参与者的满意度很高,且无不良反应。与基线相比,8 周时分别有 45%、55% 和 82% 的参与者在 T25FW、2MWT 和 TUG 方面取得了有临床意义的改善。64%和36%的参与者在MSIS-29和MSWS-12上也分别取得了有临床意义的改善:结论:远程康复对 FES 干预是安全和可行的,并观察到了功能活动性和 QOL 的改善。通过远程康复技术监测 FES 可改善患者的就医情况并减轻患者负担;因此,有必要对其疗效进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of MS care
International journal of MS care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信