Longitudinal Assessment of Communication With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Lung Cancer Screening.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3817
Christopher G Slatore, Sara E Golden, Liana Schweiger, Ian Ilea, Donald R Sullivan, Sean P M Rice, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Santanu Datta, James M Davis, Anne C Melzer
{"title":"Longitudinal Assessment of Communication With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Lung Cancer Screening.","authors":"Christopher G Slatore, Sara E Golden, Liana Schweiger, Ian Ilea, Donald R Sullivan, Sean P M Rice, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Santanu Datta, James M Davis, Anne C Melzer","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many organizations recommend clinicians use structured communication processes, referred to as shared decision-making, to improve patient-reported outcomes for patients considering lung cancer screening (LCS).</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Which components of high-quality patient-centered communication are associated with decision regret and distress?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, longitudinal, repeated measures cohort study among patients undergoing LCS in three different health care systems. We surveyed participants using validated measures of decision regret, decision satisfaction, distress, and patient-clinician communication domains up to 1 year after the low-dose CT (LDCT) imaging for LCS. For longitudinal analyses, we applied a series of generalized estimating equations to measure the association of the patient as person communication domain, screening knowledge, and decision concordance with decision regret and distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When assessed 2 to 4 weeks after the LDCT imaging, 202 respondents (58.9%) and eight respondents (2.3%) of 343 total respondents reported mild and moderate or severe decision regret, respectively, whereas 29 respondents (9.2%) of 315 total respondents reported mild distress and 19 respondents (6.0%) reported moderate or greater distress. The mean ± SD decision satisfaction scores (scale, 0-10) were 9.82 ± 0.89, 9.08 ± 1.54, and 6.13 ± 3.40 among those with no, mild, and moderate or severe regret, respectively. Distress scores remained low after the LDCT imaging, even among those with nodules. Patient-centered communication domains were not associated with decision regret or distress.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings show that patients undergoing LCS rarely experience moderate or greater decision regret and distress. Although many participants reported mild decision regret, most were very satisfied over the 1 year after LDCT imaging for LCS. Communication processes were not associated with regret and distress, suggesting that it may be challenging for communication interventions to reduce the harms of LCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"876-891"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3817","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many organizations recommend clinicians use structured communication processes, referred to as shared decision-making, to improve patient-reported outcomes for patients considering lung cancer screening (LCS).

Research question: Which components of high-quality patient-centered communication are associated with decision regret and distress?

Study design and methods: We conducted a prospective, longitudinal, repeated measures cohort study among patients undergoing LCS in three different health care systems. We surveyed participants using validated measures of decision regret, decision satisfaction, distress, and patient-clinician communication domains up to 1 year after the low-dose CT (LDCT) imaging for LCS. For longitudinal analyses, we applied a series of generalized estimating equations to measure the association of the patient as person communication domain, screening knowledge, and decision concordance with decision regret and distress.

Results: When assessed 2 to 4 weeks after the LDCT imaging, 202 respondents (58.9%) and eight respondents (2.3%) of 343 total respondents reported mild and moderate or severe decision regret, respectively, whereas 29 respondents (9.2%) of 315 total respondents reported mild distress and 19 respondents (6.0%) reported moderate or greater distress. The mean ± SD decision satisfaction scores (scale, 0-10) were 9.82 ± 0.89, 9.08 ± 1.54, and 6.13 ± 3.40 among those with no, mild, and moderate or severe regret, respectively. Distress scores remained low after the LDCT imaging, even among those with nodules. Patient-centered communication domains were not associated with decision regret or distress.

Interpretation: Our findings show that patients undergoing LCS rarely experience moderate or greater decision regret and distress. Although many participants reported mild decision regret, most were very satisfied over the 1 year after LDCT imaging for LCS. Communication processes were not associated with regret and distress, suggesting that it may be challenging for communication interventions to reduce the harms of LCS.

肺癌筛查期间与患者报告结果沟通的纵向评估。
背景:许多机构建议临床医生使用结构化的沟通流程,即 "共同决策",以改善考虑进行肺癌筛查(LCS)的患者的患者报告结果:研究设计和方法:我们对三个不同医疗系统中接受肺癌筛查的患者进行了一项前瞻性、纵向、重复测量、队列研究。我们在患者接受低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)治疗一年后,使用经过验证的决策后悔度、决策满意度、痛苦度和患者与医生沟通度等指标对其进行了调查。在纵向分析中,我们应用了一系列广义估计方程来测量 "患者即个人 "沟通域、筛查知识和决策一致性与决策遗憾和痛苦的关联:在 LDCT 结束 2-4 周后进行评估时,343 名受访者中分别有 202 人(58.9%)和 8 人(2.3%)报告了轻度和中度/重度决策遗憾,315 名受访者中分别有 29 人(9.2%)报告了轻度痛苦,19 人(6.0%)报告了中度或更严重的痛苦。在没有、轻度和中度/严重后悔的参与者中,决策满意度得分(0 至 10 分)的平均值(± SD)分别为 9.82 ± 0.89、9.08 ± 1.54 和 6.13 ± 3.40。在 LDCT 之后,即使在有结节的患者中,窘迫感得分也保持在较低水平。以患者为中心的沟通领域与决定后悔或痛苦无关:接受 LCS 治疗的患者很少出现中度或更严重的决策遗憾和痛苦。虽然许多参与者报告了轻微的决策遗憾,但大多数人在接受 LCS LDCT 一年后都非常满意。沟通过程与遗憾和痛苦无关,这表明沟通干预可能难以减少LCS的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信