A pilot study of perfusion balloon predilatation in conjunction with intracoronary nicorandil administration for acute coronary syndrome.

IF 3.1 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Masataka Yoshinaga, Takashi Muramatsu, Masato Ishikawa, Takuo Toriya, Takashi Uwatoko, Yuji Matsuwaki, Yuko Ukai, Yohei Kobayashi, Katsuyoshi Ito, Hideaki Ota, Hideo Izawa
{"title":"A pilot study of perfusion balloon predilatation in conjunction with intracoronary nicorandil administration for acute coronary syndrome.","authors":"Masataka Yoshinaga, Takashi Muramatsu, Masato Ishikawa, Takuo Toriya, Takashi Uwatoko, Yuji Matsuwaki, Yuko Ukai, Yohei Kobayashi, Katsuyoshi Ito, Hideaki Ota, Hideo Izawa","doi":"10.1007/s12928-024-01034-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Slow-flow or no-reflow phenomenon is a common procedural complication during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Given the presence of fragile plaque or thrombotic materials, we hypothesized that long-time predilatation using a perfusion balloon in conjunction with intracoronary nicorandil administration reduces the risk of slow-flow or no-reflow in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Subjects were patients presenting with ACS who underwent PCI between April 2020 and April 2022. We retrospectively investigated the incidence of slow-flow or no-reflow during the procedure as well as in-hospital outcomes in comparison between the cases undergoing 3-min predilatation using a perfusion balloon in conjunction with intracoronary nicorandil administration followed by DES implantation (PB group) and those with direct stenting (DS group). Among 439 ACS patients, 36 patients in the PB group and 51 patients in the DS group were examined. Mean age was 70 years and 78.2% was male. Distal protection devices were more frequently used in the DS group than in the PB group (31.3% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.02). The incidence rate of slow-flow or no-reflow was significantly lower in the PB group than in the DS group (2.8% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.01). Six cases (11.7%) in the DS group required intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP), while none in the PB group required (p < 0.01). In-hospital clinical outcomes did not differ between the two groups. Prolonged perfusion balloon predilatation in conjunction with intracoronary nicorandil administration was safe and feasible. This novel strategy could be an attractive alternative to conventional direct stenting for ACS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-024-01034-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Slow-flow or no-reflow phenomenon is a common procedural complication during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Given the presence of fragile plaque or thrombotic materials, we hypothesized that long-time predilatation using a perfusion balloon in conjunction with intracoronary nicorandil administration reduces the risk of slow-flow or no-reflow in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Subjects were patients presenting with ACS who underwent PCI between April 2020 and April 2022. We retrospectively investigated the incidence of slow-flow or no-reflow during the procedure as well as in-hospital outcomes in comparison between the cases undergoing 3-min predilatation using a perfusion balloon in conjunction with intracoronary nicorandil administration followed by DES implantation (PB group) and those with direct stenting (DS group). Among 439 ACS patients, 36 patients in the PB group and 51 patients in the DS group were examined. Mean age was 70 years and 78.2% was male. Distal protection devices were more frequently used in the DS group than in the PB group (31.3% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.02). The incidence rate of slow-flow or no-reflow was significantly lower in the PB group than in the DS group (2.8% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.01). Six cases (11.7%) in the DS group required intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP), while none in the PB group required (p < 0.01). In-hospital clinical outcomes did not differ between the two groups. Prolonged perfusion balloon predilatation in conjunction with intracoronary nicorandil administration was safe and feasible. This novel strategy could be an attractive alternative to conventional direct stenting for ACS patients.

灌注球囊预扩张术联合冠状动脉内尼可地尔给药治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的试验研究。
慢流或无回流现象是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)过程中常见的并发症。鉴于存在脆弱斑块或血栓物质,我们假设使用灌注球囊进行长时间预扩张,同时在冠状动脉内给予尼可地尔(nicorandil),可降低急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者出现慢流或无回流的风险。研究对象为2020年4月至2022年4月期间接受PCI治疗的ACS患者。我们回顾性研究了使用灌注球囊进行3分钟预扩张,同时在冠状动脉内给予尼可地尔,然后植入DES(PB组)和直接植入支架(DS组)的病例在手术过程中慢流或无复流的发生率以及院内预后的比较。在 439 例 ACS 患者中,PB 组有 36 例,DS 组有 51 例。平均年龄为 70 岁,78.2% 为男性。DS 组比 PB 组更常使用远端保护装置(31.3% 对 11.1%,P = 0.02)。PB 组的慢流或无回流发生率明显低于 DS 组(2.8% 对 23.5%;P = 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) is an international journal covering the field of cardiovascular disease and includes cardiac (coronary and noncoronary) and peripheral interventions and therapeutics. Articles are subject to peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability. CVIT is an official journal of The Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信