Commercially available wearable health monitors in dogs only had a very strong correlation during longer durations of time: a pilot study.

Abstract

Objective: To compare a commercially available accelerometer, FitBark 2 (FitBark 2nd Generation; FitBark) with a previously validated accelerometer, Actical (Actical; Respironics Inc) during periods of activity and rest. We hypothesized that the FitBark 2 would correlate strongly with the Actical during periods of activity and rest.

Methods: 20 dogs between the ages of 1 and 9 years of variable sex, breed, and body weight were enrolled from April through August 2022 in a 1-week pilot trial. Dogs were fitted with a neck collar with both devices mounted on it and wore it continuously for 1 week. Six time points were established to evaluate varying degrees of activity and periods of rest, which included the week, a 1-mile walk, the day of the walk, the hour the walk occurred in, 6 am to 7 am on the morning of the walk, and 11 pm to 12 am on the evening of the walk. Actical and FitBark 2 were compared using linear regression and correlation analysis.

Results: Correlation analysis revealed a very strong correlation between the Actical and FitBark 2 during the entire week of the study, with a moderate correlation at other time points. Linear regression revealed the strength of the relationship by the r2 = 0.85, F1,13 = 76.08.

Conclusions: FitBark 2 can be used to evaluate the activity and rest of dogs with varying degrees of correlation when compared to the Actical.

Clinical relevance: The time period assessed impacts the correlation of the FitBark 2 and Actical. This should be considered when using the FitBark 2 for data collection.