The evolution of selection bias in the recent epidemiologic literature-a selective overview.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Haidong Lu, Chanelle J Howe, Paul N Zivich, Gregg S Gonsalves, Daniel Westreich
{"title":"The evolution of selection bias in the recent epidemiologic literature-a selective overview.","authors":"Haidong Lu, Chanelle J Howe, Paul N Zivich, Gregg S Gonsalves, Daniel Westreich","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Selection bias has long been central in methodological discussions across epidemiology and other fields. In epidemiology, the concept of selection bias has been continually evolving over time. In this issue of American Journal of Epidemiology, Mathur and Shpitser (Am J Epidemiol. 2025;194(1):267-277) present simple graphical rules for assessing the presence of selection bias when estimating causal effects by using a single-world intervention graph (SWIG). Their work is particularly insightful as it addresses the scenarios where treatment affects sample selection-a topic that has been underexplored in previous literature on selection bias. To contextualize the work by Mathur and Shpitser, we trace the evolution of the concept of selection bias in epidemiology, focusing primarily on the developments in the last 20-30 years following the adoption of causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) in epidemiologic research.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"580-584"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11879605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae282","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Selection bias has long been central in methodological discussions across epidemiology and other fields. In epidemiology, the concept of selection bias has been continually evolving over time. In this issue of American Journal of Epidemiology, Mathur and Shpitser (Am J Epidemiol. 2025;194(1):267-277) present simple graphical rules for assessing the presence of selection bias when estimating causal effects by using a single-world intervention graph (SWIG). Their work is particularly insightful as it addresses the scenarios where treatment affects sample selection-a topic that has been underexplored in previous literature on selection bias. To contextualize the work by Mathur and Shpitser, we trace the evolution of the concept of selection bias in epidemiology, focusing primarily on the developments in the last 20-30 years following the adoption of causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) in epidemiologic research.

近期流行病学文献中选择偏差的演变--选择性概述》(The Evolution of Selection Bias in the Recent Epidemiologic Literature-A Selective Overview.
长期以来,选择偏倚一直是流行病学和其他领域方法论讨论的核心问题。在流行病学中,选择偏倚的概念随着时间的推移不断演变。在本期期刊中,Mathur 和 Shpitser(Am J Epidemiol.XXXX;XXX(XX):XXXX-XXXX)介绍了使用单一世界干预图(SWIG)的简单图形规则,以评估在估计一般人群和选定样本的治疗效果时是否存在选择偏倚。值得注意的是,作者研究了治疗影响选择的环境,而这一问题在有关选择偏差的现有文献中并没有得到很好的论述。为了将 Mathur 和 Shpitser 的研究置于上下文中,我们回顾了流行病学中选择偏倚概念的演变,主要重点是自因果有向无环图(DAG)引入流行病学研究以来的 20-30 年间的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信