What is the prevalence of anabolic-androgenic steroid use among women? A systematic review.

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Addiction Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1111/add.16643
Timothy Piatkowski, Bianca Whiteside, Jonathan Robertson, April Henning, Eric H Y Lau, Matthew Dunn
{"title":"What is the prevalence of anabolic-androgenic steroid use among women? A systematic review.","authors":"Timothy Piatkowski, Bianca Whiteside, Jonathan Robertson, April Henning, Eric H Y Lau, Matthew Dunn","doi":"10.1111/add.16643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Evidence suggests there has been an increase in anabolic-androgenic steroid (AAS) use among women, driven by the evolving landscape of women's participation in sport. However, the extent of use is unknown. This systematic review aimed to estimate the prevalence of women's AAS use.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed articles in English, focusing on AAS use among women aged 18 and above. We excluded grey literature and studies that measured doping through some form of analysis (e.g. urine or hair). Searched databases were MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, SPORTDiscus, Embase and Cochrane Library. Titles and abstracts for all articles were screened, followed by full-text assessment and data extraction of included articles by multiple authors for accuracy. The pooled prevalence of lifetime use was determined using a random effects model and the risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on 18 studies, participant numbers averaged 669 per study (median = 189; range = 16 to 7051). The overall pooled AAS use prevalence was 4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2-9%) with high heterogeneity overall (I<sup>2</sup> = 95%). In the subgroup analysis, AAS use prevalence was 16.8% (95% CI = 11.0-24.9%, I<sup>2</sup> = 44%) in the bodybuilder subgroup, 4.4% (95% CI = 1.2-15.1%, I<sup>2</sup> = 93%) in athletes/recreational gym user subgroup, and 1.4% (95% CI = 0.4-4.7%, I<sup>2</sup> = 96%) in the general population/other subgroup. Meta-regression demonstrated significantly higher AAS use in bodybuilders compared with the other subgroup (P = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anabolic-androgenic steroid use among women appears to be substantially higher among bodybuilders and athletes/recreational gym users than the general female population.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":"2088-2100"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16643","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Evidence suggests there has been an increase in anabolic-androgenic steroid (AAS) use among women, driven by the evolving landscape of women's participation in sport. However, the extent of use is unknown. This systematic review aimed to estimate the prevalence of women's AAS use.

Method: We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed articles in English, focusing on AAS use among women aged 18 and above. We excluded grey literature and studies that measured doping through some form of analysis (e.g. urine or hair). Searched databases were MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, SPORTDiscus, Embase and Cochrane Library. Titles and abstracts for all articles were screened, followed by full-text assessment and data extraction of included articles by multiple authors for accuracy. The pooled prevalence of lifetime use was determined using a random effects model and the risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool.

Results: Based on 18 studies, participant numbers averaged 669 per study (median = 189; range = 16 to 7051). The overall pooled AAS use prevalence was 4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2-9%) with high heterogeneity overall (I2 = 95%). In the subgroup analysis, AAS use prevalence was 16.8% (95% CI = 11.0-24.9%, I2 = 44%) in the bodybuilder subgroup, 4.4% (95% CI = 1.2-15.1%, I2 = 93%) in athletes/recreational gym user subgroup, and 1.4% (95% CI = 0.4-4.7%, I2 = 96%) in the general population/other subgroup. Meta-regression demonstrated significantly higher AAS use in bodybuilders compared with the other subgroup (P = 0.011).

Conclusion: Anabolic-androgenic steroid use among women appears to be substantially higher among bodybuilders and athletes/recreational gym users than the general female population.

女性使用合成代谢雄性类固醇的普遍程度如何?系统综述。
背景和目的:有证据表明,由于女性参与体育运动的情况不断变化,女性使用合成代谢雄性类固醇(AAS)的情况有所增加。然而,其使用程度尚不清楚。本系统综述旨在估算女性使用合成代谢类固醇的普遍程度:我们对经同行评审的英文文章进行了系统综述,重点关注 18 岁及以上女性使用 AAS 的情况。我们排除了灰色文献和通过某种形式的分析(如尿液或毛发)来测量兴奋剂的研究。检索的数据库包括 MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、SocINDEX、SPORTDiscus、Embase 和 Cochrane Library。对所有文章的标题和摘要进行筛选,然后由多位作者对纳入文章进行全文评估和数据提取,以确保准确性。使用随机效应模型确定了终生使用的汇总流行率,并使用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所流行率关键评估工具评估了偏倚风险:基于 18 项研究,平均每项研究的参与者人数为 669 人(中位数 = 189;范围 = 16 至 7051)。总体汇总的AAS使用率为4%(95%置信区间[CI] = 2-9%),总体异质性较高(I2 = 95%)。在亚组分析中,健美运动员亚组的AAS使用率为16.8%(95% CI = 11.0-24.9%,I2 = 44%),运动员/休闲健身房使用者亚组的AAS使用率为4.4%(95% CI = 1.2-15.1%,I2 = 93%),普通人群/其他亚组的AAS使用率为1.4%(95% CI = 0.4-4.7%,I2 = 96%)。元回归结果表明,健美运动员使用合成代谢类固醇的比例明显高于其他亚组(P = 0.011):女性中合成代谢雄激素类固醇的使用率在健美运动员和运动员/休闲健身房使用者中似乎远远高于普通女性人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信