Research in Psychiatry Medical Education through “MUST Enrich Grant”: A Scoping Review

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Nitisha Verma, Snehil Gupta, Pooja Shatadal
{"title":"Research in Psychiatry Medical Education through “MUST Enrich Grant”: A Scoping Review","authors":"Nitisha Verma, Snehil Gupta, Pooja Shatadal","doi":"10.1177/02537176241265742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:The Indian Teachers of Psychiatry (IToP) forum introduced a unique research grant scheme- IToP-MUST (Minds United Scholarship for Teachers) Enrich Research Grant- for conducting research in psychiatry education. This scoping review’s objectives are to (a) assess the research areas and methodologies of MUST Enrich grant-supported research, (b) identify strengths and limitations of these research works, and (c) inform the researchers and funding agency concerning robust methodologies and study areas that can be considered in the future.Methods:We included all MUST-funded original educational research projects from their inception (2020) to the present, which were either published or, although unpublished, available in the public domain.Results:Eleven research projects were identified. Most awardees were junior academic faculty members (n = 9, 82%). Eight (73%) studies were related to Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) and were based on teaching-learning (TL) or related methods under the CBME framework, focusing on newer TL methods. Seven of eight (88%) were based on undergraduate TL. Most (n = 8, 73%) of the studies had an observational cross-sectional design, whereas the rest were interventional studies. Almost all were quantitative studies (n = 10, 91%). The prime themes of the research were students’ and teachers’ perspectives on the study topic, innovations in psychiatry TL, and their educational impact.Conclusion:This review’s findings will inform funders and researchers about future research areas and help formulate robust methodologies. Other funders must earmark their funding for educational research to grow this field.","PeriodicalId":13476,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176241265742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:The Indian Teachers of Psychiatry (IToP) forum introduced a unique research grant scheme- IToP-MUST (Minds United Scholarship for Teachers) Enrich Research Grant- for conducting research in psychiatry education. This scoping review’s objectives are to (a) assess the research areas and methodologies of MUST Enrich grant-supported research, (b) identify strengths and limitations of these research works, and (c) inform the researchers and funding agency concerning robust methodologies and study areas that can be considered in the future.Methods:We included all MUST-funded original educational research projects from their inception (2020) to the present, which were either published or, although unpublished, available in the public domain.Results:Eleven research projects were identified. Most awardees were junior academic faculty members (n = 9, 82%). Eight (73%) studies were related to Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) and were based on teaching-learning (TL) or related methods under the CBME framework, focusing on newer TL methods. Seven of eight (88%) were based on undergraduate TL. Most (n = 8, 73%) of the studies had an observational cross-sectional design, whereas the rest were interventional studies. Almost all were quantitative studies (n = 10, 91%). The prime themes of the research were students’ and teachers’ perspectives on the study topic, innovations in psychiatry TL, and their educational impact.Conclusion:This review’s findings will inform funders and researchers about future research areas and help formulate robust methodologies. Other funders must earmark their funding for educational research to grow this field.
通过 "MUST Enrich Grant "开展精神病学医学教育研究:范围审查
背景:印度精神病学教师(IToP)论坛推出了一项独特的研究补助金计划--IToP-MUST(Minds United Scholarship for Teachers)丰富研究补助金--用于开展精神病学教育研究。本范围审查的目的是:(a)评估 MUST Enrich 研究补助金支持的研究领域和方法;(b)确定这些研究工作的优势和局限性;以及(c)向研究人员和资助机构提供有关未来可考虑的稳健方法和研究领域的信息。方法:我们纳入了 MUST 资助的所有原创教育研究项目,这些项目从开始(2020 年)至今,要么已发表,要么虽未发表但可在公共领域获得。大多数获奖者为初级学术教师(9 人,占 82%)。八项研究(73%)与能力本位医学教育(CBME)有关,基于能力本位医学教育框架下的教与学(TL)或相关方法,侧重于较新的教与学方法。八项研究中有七项(88%)基于本科生教学法。大多数研究(8 项,占 73%)采用观察性横断面设计,其余则为干预性研究。几乎所有研究都是定量研究(10 项,91%)。研究的首要主题是学生和教师对研究课题的看法、精神病学 TL 的创新及其对教育的影响。其他资助者必须为教育研究提供专项资金,以促进这一领域的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (ISSN 0253-7176) was started in 1978 as the official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society South Zonal Branch. The journal allows free access (Open Access) and is published Bimonthly. The Journal includes but is not limited to review articles, original research, opinions, and letters. The Editor and publisher accept no legal responsibility for any opinions, omissions or errors by the authors, nor do they approve of any product advertised within the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信