Does Helping Others Always Benefit Health? Longitudinal Evidence on the Relationship between Helping Behavior and Depression: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction and the Moderating Effect of IADL

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Yan Cheng, Yue Wei, Shao-Liang Tang
{"title":"Does Helping Others Always Benefit Health? Longitudinal Evidence on the Relationship between Helping Behavior and Depression: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction and the Moderating Effect of IADL","authors":"Yan Cheng,&nbsp;Yue Wei,&nbsp;Shao-Liang Tang","doi":"10.1155/2024/2304723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. This study aims to explore whether helping behavior is always beneficial for alleviating depression or if there is a “moderation is the key” effect. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. This study focused on a sample of 7,436 participants from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). The 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10) was used to identify the presence of depression. Linear mixed model and Quasi-Bayesian estimation methods were used to explore the mediating role of life satisfaction in the relationship between helping behavior and depression, as well as the moderating effects of the instrumental activity of daily living (IADL). Additionally, we employed the Johnson–Neyman technique to visualize the moderating effect of IADL. <i>Results</i>. Helping behavior shows a negative correlation with depression (<i>B</i> = −0.170, <i>p</i> = 0.020), where life satisfaction fully mediates this relationship (effect = −0.055, 95% confidence interval = −0.088 to −0.022). Moreover, the association between helping behavior and life satisfaction is moderated by IADL (<i>B</i> = −0.047, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Specifically, when IADL is below 0.56, helping behavior positively impacts life satisfaction. In contrast, when IADL exceeds 1.99, helping behavior has a detrimental effect on life satisfaction. <i>Conclusions</i>. This study highlights the significant positive impact of helping behavior on depression alleviation, which is achieved by increasing life satisfaction. Notably, although helping behavior has positive effects on individuals, not everyone can benefit directly from it. Only those without functional limitations are more likely to experience the benefits of such behavior. Therefore, when policymakers and researchers develop strategies to encourage individuals in helping behavior to combat depression, they should consider two key approaches. First, life satisfaction should be used as an important indicator in the treatment of depression, allowing for timely adjustments to ensure the effectiveness and individualization of treatment plans. Second, the principle of “moderation is the key” should be prioritized, ensuring that helping behavior can maximize its benefits and help individuals emerge from the shadows of depression.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2304723","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/2304723","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. This study aims to explore whether helping behavior is always beneficial for alleviating depression or if there is a “moderation is the key” effect. Materials and Methods. This study focused on a sample of 7,436 participants from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). The 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10) was used to identify the presence of depression. Linear mixed model and Quasi-Bayesian estimation methods were used to explore the mediating role of life satisfaction in the relationship between helping behavior and depression, as well as the moderating effects of the instrumental activity of daily living (IADL). Additionally, we employed the Johnson–Neyman technique to visualize the moderating effect of IADL. Results. Helping behavior shows a negative correlation with depression (B = −0.170, p = 0.020), where life satisfaction fully mediates this relationship (effect = −0.055, 95% confidence interval = −0.088 to −0.022). Moreover, the association between helping behavior and life satisfaction is moderated by IADL (B = −0.047, p < 0.001). Specifically, when IADL is below 0.56, helping behavior positively impacts life satisfaction. In contrast, when IADL exceeds 1.99, helping behavior has a detrimental effect on life satisfaction. Conclusions. This study highlights the significant positive impact of helping behavior on depression alleviation, which is achieved by increasing life satisfaction. Notably, although helping behavior has positive effects on individuals, not everyone can benefit directly from it. Only those without functional limitations are more likely to experience the benefits of such behavior. Therefore, when policymakers and researchers develop strategies to encourage individuals in helping behavior to combat depression, they should consider two key approaches. First, life satisfaction should be used as an important indicator in the treatment of depression, allowing for timely adjustments to ensure the effectiveness and individualization of treatment plans. Second, the principle of “moderation is the key” should be prioritized, ensuring that helping behavior can maximize its benefits and help individuals emerge from the shadows of depression.

Abstract Image

帮助他人一定有益健康吗?助人行为与抑郁症之间关系的纵向证据:生活满意度的中介作用和 IADL 的调节作用
研究背景本研究旨在探讨帮助行为是否总是有利于缓解抑郁,或者是否存在 "适度是关键 "的效应。材料与方法。本研究以中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)的 7436 名参与者为样本。采用 10 项流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CESD-10)来确定是否患有抑郁症。我们采用线性混合模型和准贝叶斯估计方法来探讨生活满意度在帮助行为与抑郁之间关系中的中介作用,以及日常生活工具性活动(IADL)的调节作用。此外,我们还采用了约翰逊-奈曼(Johnson-Neyman)技术来直观显示 IADL 的调节作用。研究结果帮助行为与抑郁呈负相关(B = -0.170,P = 0.020),而生活满意度完全调节了这种关系(效应 = -0.055,95% 置信区间 = -0.088 至 -0.022)。此外,帮助行为与生活满意度之间的关系受到 IADL 的调节(B = -0.047,p < 0.001)。具体来说,当 IADL 低于 0.56 时,帮助行为会对生活满意度产生积极影响。相反,当 IADL 超过 1.99 时,帮助行为会对生活满意度产生不利影响。结论本研究强调了帮助行为对缓解抑郁的重大积极影响,而这是通过提高生活满意度来实现的。值得注意的是,尽管助人行为对个人有积极影响,但并非每个人都能从中直接受益。只有那些没有功能限制的人才更有可能体验到这种行为的益处。因此,政策制定者和研究人员在制定鼓励个人帮助行为以对抗抑郁症的策略时,应考虑两个关键方法。首先,应将生活满意度作为治疗抑郁症的重要指标,以便及时调整,确保治疗方案的有效性和个性化。其次,应优先考虑 "适度是关键 "的原则,确保助人行为能够发挥最大效益,帮助个人走出抑郁症的阴影。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信