Interactive effects of fire and grazing on vegetation structure and plant species composition in subtropical grasslands

IF 2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Fernando Forster Furquim, John Derek Scasta, Gerhard Ernst Overbeck
{"title":"Interactive effects of fire and grazing on vegetation structure and plant species composition in subtropical grasslands","authors":"Fernando Forster Furquim,&nbsp;John Derek Scasta,&nbsp;Gerhard Ernst Overbeck","doi":"10.1111/avsc.12800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Question</h3>\n \n <p>Fire and grazing, and their interaction, are the main drivers of vegetation structure and plant species composition in many grasslands globally. However, for subtropical grasslands in southern Brazil, the interactive effects of fire and grazing on plant community composition characteristics remain relatively understudied, even though this ecosystem is recognized as fire-dependent with critical importance for livestock grazing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Subtropical grassland in southern Brazil (Santiago, Rio Grande do Sul state).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Beginning in 2017, we established an experiment with three treatments: fire only (F), grazing only (G), and fire and grazing (F + G). Grazing was continuous with ca 1.1 animal unit per hectare annually and prescribed fires were applied annually in winter. We assessed vegetation structure (via percentage of bare soil, height of canopy, and available forage) and plant species composition during spring (November) and summer (March) of 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 (only summer season).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Differences in vegetation structure were found among treatments, wherein bare soil, height of canopy and available forage were higher in F, and lower but similar in F + G and G. Plant species richness was equal among treatments, but cover of C3 grasses was higher in F than in other treatments, and shrub cover was lower in F and F + G in comparison to G. In F + G treatment, available biomass for subsequent burning was limited, resulting in lower amounts of fuel, reduced fire spread, and ultimately less total area burned in the subsequent years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that interaction of fire and grazing can be a useful vegetation management tool for conserving native plant species, increasing availability of more desirable forage plants, and decreasing shrubs (including toxic <i>Senecio</i> species which contain hepatotoxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids). The singular and interactive effects of fire and grazing suggest the subhumid Río de la Plata grasslands are a fire-adapted ecosystem with variable plant functional trait responses facilitating differential dominance. There is a need for future work to address spatio-temporal variability and vegetation heterogeneity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55494,"journal":{"name":"Applied Vegetation Science","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.12800","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Question

Fire and grazing, and their interaction, are the main drivers of vegetation structure and plant species composition in many grasslands globally. However, for subtropical grasslands in southern Brazil, the interactive effects of fire and grazing on plant community composition characteristics remain relatively understudied, even though this ecosystem is recognized as fire-dependent with critical importance for livestock grazing.

Location

Subtropical grassland in southern Brazil (Santiago, Rio Grande do Sul state).

Methods

Beginning in 2017, we established an experiment with three treatments: fire only (F), grazing only (G), and fire and grazing (F + G). Grazing was continuous with ca 1.1 animal unit per hectare annually and prescribed fires were applied annually in winter. We assessed vegetation structure (via percentage of bare soil, height of canopy, and available forage) and plant species composition during spring (November) and summer (March) of 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 (only summer season).

Results

Differences in vegetation structure were found among treatments, wherein bare soil, height of canopy and available forage were higher in F, and lower but similar in F + G and G. Plant species richness was equal among treatments, but cover of C3 grasses was higher in F than in other treatments, and shrub cover was lower in F and F + G in comparison to G. In F + G treatment, available biomass for subsequent burning was limited, resulting in lower amounts of fuel, reduced fire spread, and ultimately less total area burned in the subsequent years.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that interaction of fire and grazing can be a useful vegetation management tool for conserving native plant species, increasing availability of more desirable forage plants, and decreasing shrubs (including toxic Senecio species which contain hepatotoxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids). The singular and interactive effects of fire and grazing suggest the subhumid Río de la Plata grasslands are a fire-adapted ecosystem with variable plant functional trait responses facilitating differential dominance. There is a need for future work to address spatio-temporal variability and vegetation heterogeneity.

Abstract Image

火灾和放牧对亚热带草原植被结构和植物物种组成的交互影响
问题 火和放牧及其相互作用是全球许多草原植被结构和植物物种组成的主要驱动因素。然而,对于巴西南部的亚热带草原来说,尽管该生态系统被认为依赖于火,对牲畜放牧至关重要,但对火和放牧对植物群落组成特征的交互影响的研究仍然相对不足。 地点 巴西南部的亚热带草原(南里奥格兰德州圣地亚哥)。 方法 从 2017 年开始,我们开展了一项实验,其中包括三种处理方法:仅火烧(F)、仅放牧(G)和火烧加放牧(F + G)。放牧是持续性的,每年每公顷放牧约 1.1 头牲畜,每年冬季使用火烧。我们在 2017 年、2018 年、2019 年和 2020 年(仅夏季)的春季(11 月)和夏季(3 月)评估了植被结构(通过裸露土壤的百分比、冠层高度和可用饲料)和植物物种组成。 结果 发现不同处理的植被结构存在差异,其中 F 处理的裸露土壤、树冠高度和可利用饲料较高,F + G 和 G 处理的裸露土壤、树冠高度和可利用饲料较低但相似。 结论 我们的研究结果表明,火与放牧的交互作用是一种有用的植被管理工具,可以保护本地植物物种,增加更多理想饲料植物的供应,减少灌木(包括含有肝毒性吡咯烷生物碱的有毒箭毒草物种)。火灾和放牧的单一效应和交互效应表明,亚湿润的里奥德拉普拉塔草原是一个与火灾相适应的生态系统,其植物功能性状反应各异,有利于形成不同的优势。今后的工作需要解决时空变异性和植被异质性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Vegetation Science
Applied Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Vegetation Science focuses on community-level topics relevant to human interaction with vegetation, including global change, nature conservation, nature management, restoration of plant communities and of natural habitats, and the planning of semi-natural and urban landscapes. Vegetation survey, modelling and remote-sensing applications are welcome. Papers on vegetation science which do not fit to this scope (do not have an applied aspect and are not vegetation survey) should be directed to our associate journal, the Journal of Vegetation Science. Both journals publish papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信