Global prevalence of staphylococcal enterotoxins in food contaminated by Staphylococcus spp.—Systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Juliana Karla Garcia Ribeiro Freitas, Cristiane Fernandes de Assis, Thailla Raquel Moura de Oliveira, Bruno Jonatan de Sousa, Cláudio Márcio de Medeiros Maia, Annemberg Salvino Pereira, Gidyenne Christine Bandeira Silva de Medeiros, Larissa Mont'Alverne Jucá Seabra, Karla Suzanne Florentino da Silva Chaves Damasceno
{"title":"Global prevalence of staphylococcal enterotoxins in food contaminated by Staphylococcus spp.—Systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Juliana Karla Garcia Ribeiro Freitas,&nbsp;Cristiane Fernandes de Assis,&nbsp;Thailla Raquel Moura de Oliveira,&nbsp;Bruno Jonatan de Sousa,&nbsp;Cláudio Márcio de Medeiros Maia,&nbsp;Annemberg Salvino Pereira,&nbsp;Gidyenne Christine Bandeira Silva de Medeiros,&nbsp;Larissa Mont'Alverne Jucá Seabra,&nbsp;Karla Suzanne Florentino da Silva Chaves Damasceno","doi":"10.1111/jfs.13154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis integrates the results of studies on the occurrence of staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE), the knowledge related to the profile of the foods most often involved, and the types of SE found. The study followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for SR and Meta-Analyses, and its protocol was registered on the PROSPERO platform (CRD42021258223). Primary cross-sectional studies that report the analysis of SEs in food contaminated by <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. were selected. All stages of study selection and data extraction were performed by two researchers independently, and in cases of conflicts, a third researcher was consulted. To assess the risk of bias, we used the critical appraisal checklist of the Joanna Briggs Institute. A total of 3012 reports were listed initially and 217 after the search update. After removing the duplicates, 2535 studies were found combining all databases and manual searches. Thus, 38 studies were included in this SR. In the meta-analysis, group 1 (dairy products) showed a prevalence of positive samples for SE of 15.38%, group 2 (meat products) 1.78% and group 3 (other foods) 27.11%. The results showed a considerable prevalence of SE in food contaminated by <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp., especially in group 3, which included mixed and ready-to-eat foods. This SR contributes to the study of the epidemiological profile and highlights the importance of adopting more effective prevention measures and policies aimed at improving public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":15814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Safety","volume":"44 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfs.13154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis integrates the results of studies on the occurrence of staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE), the knowledge related to the profile of the foods most often involved, and the types of SE found. The study followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for SR and Meta-Analyses, and its protocol was registered on the PROSPERO platform (CRD42021258223). Primary cross-sectional studies that report the analysis of SEs in food contaminated by Staphylococcus spp. were selected. All stages of study selection and data extraction were performed by two researchers independently, and in cases of conflicts, a third researcher was consulted. To assess the risk of bias, we used the critical appraisal checklist of the Joanna Briggs Institute. A total of 3012 reports were listed initially and 217 after the search update. After removing the duplicates, 2535 studies were found combining all databases and manual searches. Thus, 38 studies were included in this SR. In the meta-analysis, group 1 (dairy products) showed a prevalence of positive samples for SE of 15.38%, group 2 (meat products) 1.78% and group 3 (other foods) 27.11%. The results showed a considerable prevalence of SE in food contaminated by Staphylococcus spp., especially in group 3, which included mixed and ready-to-eat foods. This SR contributes to the study of the epidemiological profile and highlights the importance of adopting more effective prevention measures and policies aimed at improving public health.

受葡萄球菌污染的食品中葡萄球菌肠毒素的全球流行率--系统回顾和荟萃分析
本系统综述(SR)和荟萃分析综合了有关葡萄球菌肠毒素(SE)发生率的研究结果、与最常涉及的食品特征相关的知识以及发现的 SE 类型。该研究遵循《SR 和 Meta 分析首选报告项目》的指导原则,其方案已在 PROSPERO 平台上注册(CRD42021258223)。研究选取了报告受葡萄球菌污染的食物中 SEs 分析的主要横断面研究。研究筛选和数据提取的所有阶段均由两名研究人员独立完成,如有冲突,则咨询第三名研究人员。为了评估偏倚风险,我们使用了乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的关键评估清单。最初共列出了 3012 篇报告,搜索更新后列出了 217 篇。去除重复内容后,综合所有数据库和人工检索,共找到 2535 项研究。因此,本研究纳入了 38 项研究。在荟萃分析中,第 1 组(乳制品)显示 SE 阳性样本的流行率为 15.38%,第 2 组(肉制品)为 1.78%,第 3 组(其他食品)为 27.11%。结果表明,在受葡萄球菌污染的食品中,特别是在第 3 组(包括混合食品和即食食品)中,SE 的流行率相当高。本研究有助于对流行病学概况的研究,并强调了采取更有效的预防措施和政策以改善公共卫生的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Safety
Journal of Food Safety 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Safety emphasizes mechanistic studies involving inhibition, injury, and metabolism of food poisoning microorganisms, as well as the regulation of growth and toxin production in both model systems and complex food substrates. It also focuses on pathogens which cause food-borne illness, helping readers understand the factors affecting the initial detection of parasites, their development, transmission, and methods of control and destruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信