Dosimetric benefits of customised mouth-bite for head neck cancer patients undergoing modern proton therapy – An audit

Q1 Nursing
{"title":"Dosimetric benefits of customised mouth-bite for head neck cancer patients undergoing modern proton therapy – An audit","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>Proton therapy (PRT) for Head Neck Cancer (HNC), in view of the Bragg peak, spares critical structures like oral mucosa better than IMRT. In PRT, mouth-bites, besides immobilising and separating mucosal surfaces, may also negate the end-of-range effect. We retrospectively analysed the details and dosimetric impact of mouth-bites in PRT for HNC.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The data of consecutive HNC patients treated with IMPT from May 2020 to August 2022 were studied retrospectively. Details of the mouth-bite used, compliance and resultant mucosal separation were noted. Further analysis, restricted to previously unirradiated patients, comprised volumetric dosimetric data pertaining to the mouth-bite and distal mucosal surfaces. High LET zones, corresponding to 6–12 keV/micron, for mouth-bite doses above 30 Gy, were recalculated from existing plans.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A mouth-bite was used in 69 of 80 consecutively treated patients, ranging from 8 to 42 mm in thickness, and 12 to 52 mm in the resultant mucosal sparing. In 42 patients in whom the mouth-bite V 32 Gy was &gt; 0, median Dmean, absolute V32, V39, V50 and V60 GyE (Gray Equivalent) of the mouth bite was 35.65 GyE (Range: 2.65 – 60 GyE), 10 cc (Range: 0.1 – 32 cc), 7.6 cc (Range: 0.1 – 30.8 cc), 5.7 cc (Range: 0.2 – 29.2 cc) and 1.45 cc (Range: 0.2 – 18.1 cc) respectively, all significantly more than the spared adjacent mucosal surface. In absence of a mouth-bite, the spared mucosa would have at least partially received the high dose received by the mouth-bite. High LET zones were noted in 12 of 48 mouth-bites.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In PRT for HNC, mouth-bites play a vital role in improving the sparing of mucosa outside the target.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000325/pdfft?md5=3aad4e4e06f6e715af6d9e5cf81d75aa&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632424000325-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Proton therapy (PRT) for Head Neck Cancer (HNC), in view of the Bragg peak, spares critical structures like oral mucosa better than IMRT. In PRT, mouth-bites, besides immobilising and separating mucosal surfaces, may also negate the end-of-range effect. We retrospectively analysed the details and dosimetric impact of mouth-bites in PRT for HNC.

Materials and methods

The data of consecutive HNC patients treated with IMPT from May 2020 to August 2022 were studied retrospectively. Details of the mouth-bite used, compliance and resultant mucosal separation were noted. Further analysis, restricted to previously unirradiated patients, comprised volumetric dosimetric data pertaining to the mouth-bite and distal mucosal surfaces. High LET zones, corresponding to 6–12 keV/micron, for mouth-bite doses above 30 Gy, were recalculated from existing plans.

Results

A mouth-bite was used in 69 of 80 consecutively treated patients, ranging from 8 to 42 mm in thickness, and 12 to 52 mm in the resultant mucosal sparing. In 42 patients in whom the mouth-bite V 32 Gy was > 0, median Dmean, absolute V32, V39, V50 and V60 GyE (Gray Equivalent) of the mouth bite was 35.65 GyE (Range: 2.65 – 60 GyE), 10 cc (Range: 0.1 – 32 cc), 7.6 cc (Range: 0.1 – 30.8 cc), 5.7 cc (Range: 0.2 – 29.2 cc) and 1.45 cc (Range: 0.2 – 18.1 cc) respectively, all significantly more than the spared adjacent mucosal surface. In absence of a mouth-bite, the spared mucosa would have at least partially received the high dose received by the mouth-bite. High LET zones were noted in 12 of 48 mouth-bites.

Conclusion

In PRT for HNC, mouth-bites play a vital role in improving the sparing of mucosa outside the target.

为接受现代质子治疗的头颈部癌症患者量身定制咬合口的剂量学优势 - 审计
背景和目的鉴于布拉格峰,头颈癌(HNC)的质子治疗(PRT)比 IMRT 更能保护口腔粘膜等关键结构。在 PRT 中,口腔咬合除了固定和分离粘膜表面外,还可能会抵消射程末端效应。材料与方法回顾性研究了 2020 年 5 月至 2022 年 8 月期间接受 IMPT 治疗的连续 HNC 患者的数据。详细记录了使用的口腔咬合、顺应性和导致的粘膜分离。进一步的分析仅限于之前未接受过辐照的患者,包括与咬合口和远端粘膜表面有关的容积剂量学数据。根据现有计划重新计算了咬合口剂量超过 30 Gy 时的高 LET 区(相当于 6-12 keV/微米)。结果 在 80 位连续接受治疗的患者中,有 69 位患者使用了咬合口,咬合口厚度从 8 毫米到 42 毫米不等,粘膜分离度从 12 毫米到 52 毫米不等。在 42 例口腔咬合 V 32 Gy 为 0 的患者中,口腔咬合的中位 Dmean、绝对 V32、V39、V50 和 V60 GyE(格雷当量)分别为 35.65 GyE(范围:2.65 - 60 GyE)、10 cc(范围:0.分别为 35.65 GyE(范围:2.65 - 60 GyE)、10 毫升(范围:0.2 - 18.1 毫升)、7.6 毫升(范围:0.1 - 30.8 毫升)、5.7 毫升(范围:0.2 - 29.2 毫升)和 1.45 毫升(范围:0.2 - 18.1 毫升),均明显高于幸免的邻近粘膜表面。在没有口腔咬合的情况下,幸免于难的粘膜至少会部分接收到口腔咬合所产生的高剂量。结论:在针对 HNC 的 PRT 中,咬合口在改善目标外粘膜的保护方面起着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信