Serum zinc status of patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

{"title":"Serum zinc status of patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtemin.2024.100185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Among the increasing number of cancer cases, colorectal cancer (CRC) cases are rising globally. The association of zinc in the neoplastic process of CRC is a major research avenue, yet the published reports have not provided any definitive conclusion.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We examined the association between serum zinc levels and CRC to test the potential of zinc dysregulation as a CRC susceptibility factor.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this systemic review and meta-analysis, we extensively searched EBSCOhost, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science as well as manual screening by subject experts for studies reporting serum/plasma/blood zinc levels in CRC patients and control subjects till 27th August 2023. Based on a random effect model, we estimated the mean difference in serum/plasma/blood zinc levels between CRC cases and control subjects. Subgroup differences and publication bias were also investigated, along with a critical appraisal of included studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighteen studies with 8330 participants were included. The difference in serum zinc between CRC patients and control subjects was –5.01 µg/dl [95 % CI: −21.76 to 11.74; <em>p</em> = 0.56]. Omitting a highly influential outlier study, made this difference statistically significant at –13.28 µg/dl [95 % CI: −20.66 to -5.90, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01]. The difference between study effects could not be explained by the difference in analytical methods for zinc assessment, or type of blood samples.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CRC patients had lower serum zinc levels. Some factors, such as different tumor grades of CRC, adenomas, and colonic polyps need to be further considered for a more conclusive association between serum zinc levels and risk for CRC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of trace elements and minerals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773050624000703/pdfft?md5=e6608dee92e8b769fb2eb94c1d85689b&pid=1-s2.0-S2773050624000703-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of trace elements and minerals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773050624000703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Among the increasing number of cancer cases, colorectal cancer (CRC) cases are rising globally. The association of zinc in the neoplastic process of CRC is a major research avenue, yet the published reports have not provided any definitive conclusion.

Objectives

We examined the association between serum zinc levels and CRC to test the potential of zinc dysregulation as a CRC susceptibility factor.

Methods

In this systemic review and meta-analysis, we extensively searched EBSCOhost, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science as well as manual screening by subject experts for studies reporting serum/plasma/blood zinc levels in CRC patients and control subjects till 27th August 2023. Based on a random effect model, we estimated the mean difference in serum/plasma/blood zinc levels between CRC cases and control subjects. Subgroup differences and publication bias were also investigated, along with a critical appraisal of included studies.

Results

Eighteen studies with 8330 participants were included. The difference in serum zinc between CRC patients and control subjects was –5.01 µg/dl [95 % CI: −21.76 to 11.74; p = 0.56]. Omitting a highly influential outlier study, made this difference statistically significant at –13.28 µg/dl [95 % CI: −20.66 to -5.90, p < 0.01]. The difference between study effects could not be explained by the difference in analytical methods for zinc assessment, or type of blood samples.

Conclusion

CRC patients had lower serum zinc levels. Some factors, such as different tumor grades of CRC, adenomas, and colonic polyps need to be further considered for a more conclusive association between serum zinc levels and risk for CRC.

结直肠癌患者的血清锌状况:系统回顾和荟萃分析
导言在癌症病例不断增加的过程中,结直肠癌(CRC)病例在全球范围内呈上升趋势。我们研究了血清锌水平与 CRC 之间的关系,以检验锌失调作为 CRC 易感因素的可能性。方法在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们广泛检索了 EBSCOhost、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、ProQuest、PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Web of Science,并由主题专家人工筛选了截至 2023 年 8 月 27 日报告 CRC 患者和对照组血清/血浆/血液锌水平的研究。基于随机效应模型,我们估算了 CRC 病例与对照组之间血清/血浆/血液锌水平的平均差异。我们还调查了亚组差异和发表偏倚,并对纳入的研究进行了批判性评估。CRC患者与对照组之间的血清锌差异为-5.01 µg/dl [95 % CI: -21.76 to 11.74; p = 0.56]。剔除一项影响较大的离群研究后,这一差异达到了统计学意义上的-13.28 µg/dl [95 % CI: -20.66 to -5.90, p < 0.01]。研究效果之间的差异无法用锌评估分析方法或血样类型的不同来解释。需要进一步考虑一些因素,如不同肿瘤等级的 CRC、腺瘤和结肠息肉,以确定血清锌水平与 CRC 风险之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of trace elements and minerals
Journal of trace elements and minerals Medicine and Dentistry (General), Analytical Chemistry, Environmental Science (General), Toxicology, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (General), Nutrition, Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信