Taking a break from social media: Media ideologies of (not) sharing in celebrity culture

IF 1.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Tereza Spilioti , Korina Giaxoglou
{"title":"Taking a break from social media: Media ideologies of (not) sharing in celebrity culture","authors":"Tereza Spilioti ,&nbsp;Korina Giaxoglou","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the continued drive for sharing the self online, social media users have been increasingly orienting to practices of ‘not sharing’ in the context of wider debates about digital wellbeing. In this article, we investigate how celebrities manage and navigate online sharing. We focus on media ideologies in social media posts that announce the celebrities' decision to ‘take a break’, i.e. to stop posting and/or engaging with social media content. Our analysis of these announcements as rich examples of <em>metapragmatic awareness</em> points to three main discourses that justify celebrities' decision to take a break: (a) mental health and wellbeing, (b) public-private boundaries, and (c) social justice and protest. These justifications of ‘not sharing’ are associated with <em>metapragmatic typifications</em> of celebrities who position themselves as <em>vulnerable</em>, but also as <em>agentive</em>, <em>professional</em> and <em>role models</em> for their fans. The article offers empirical insights into how power players of the social mediascape, such as celebrities, understand and orient to meanings and practices of digital sharing. In terms of practical implications, the study of celebrities' metapragmatic discourse reveals how fans, as ordinary users, are presented with opportunities and models of managing social media activity, owning mental health issues and acting on them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"231 ","pages":"Pages 35-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216624001413/pdfft?md5=b311a5983ea24ea850841fac9a5d3205&pid=1-s2.0-S0378216624001413-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216624001413","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the continued drive for sharing the self online, social media users have been increasingly orienting to practices of ‘not sharing’ in the context of wider debates about digital wellbeing. In this article, we investigate how celebrities manage and navigate online sharing. We focus on media ideologies in social media posts that announce the celebrities' decision to ‘take a break’, i.e. to stop posting and/or engaging with social media content. Our analysis of these announcements as rich examples of metapragmatic awareness points to three main discourses that justify celebrities' decision to take a break: (a) mental health and wellbeing, (b) public-private boundaries, and (c) social justice and protest. These justifications of ‘not sharing’ are associated with metapragmatic typifications of celebrities who position themselves as vulnerable, but also as agentive, professional and role models for their fans. The article offers empirical insights into how power players of the social mediascape, such as celebrities, understand and orient to meanings and practices of digital sharing. In terms of practical implications, the study of celebrities' metapragmatic discourse reveals how fans, as ordinary users, are presented with opportunities and models of managing social media activity, owning mental health issues and acting on them.

远离社交媒体:名人文化中(不)分享的媒体意识形态
尽管网上分享自我的热潮仍在继续,但在有关数字福祉的广泛讨论中,社交媒体用户越来越倾向于 "不分享 "的做法。在本文中,我们将研究名人是如何管理和引导网络分享的。我们关注社交媒体帖子中的媒体意识形态,这些帖子宣布名人决定 "休息",即停止发布和/或参与社交媒体内容。我们将这些公告作为元意识的丰富实例进行分析,指出了名人决定休息的三个主要理由:(a) 精神健康和福祉,(b) 公私界限,以及 (c) 社会正义和抗议。这些 "不分享 "的理由与名人的形而上学类型有关,名人将自己定位为弱势群体,同时也是粉丝的代理人、专业人士和榜样。文章通过实证研究,深入探讨了名人等社交媒体领域的实权人物是如何理解和定位数字分享的意义和实践的。就实际意义而言,对名人元话语的研究揭示了作为普通用户的粉丝如何获得管理社交媒体活动的机会和模式,如何拥有心理健康问题并采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信